___

• Farman AG, Farman TT.A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99: 485-489.
• Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2637-2655.
• Wakoh M, Kuroyanagi K. Digital imaging modalities for dental practice. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2001; 42: 1-14.
• van der Stelt PF. Principles of digital imaging. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 237-248.
• Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter JP. Presentation RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 238-242. evaluation of
• Sanderink GC, Miles DA. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 249-255.
• Wenzel A, Mİystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010; 68: 106-14.
• Parks ET. Digital radiographic imaging: is the dental practice ready? J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 477-481.
• Paurazas SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, Hoen MM, Steiman HR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E- speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 356-362.
• Kitagawa H, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 408–411.
• Farman AG, Levato CM, Gane D, Scarfe WC. In practice: how going digital will affect the dental office. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 Suppl: 14S-19S.
• van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging. The uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1379-87.
• Tsuchida R, Araki K, Endo A, Funahashi I, Okano T. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 603–8.
• http://www.gendex- dental.com/Default.aspx?navid=562214&oid=201& lid=En
• Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital radiography: an overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002; 3: 23-39.
• Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Gröndahl HG. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 70-75.
• http://airforcemedicine.afms.mil/idc/groups/public/ documents/afms/ctb_109171.pdf
• http://www.soredex.com/products/intraoral- imaging/classic-digora-optime.aspx
• Miles DA. Imaging using solid-state detectors. Dent Clin North Am 1993; 37: 531-540.
• Lim KF, Loh EE-M,Hong HY. Quantitative assessment of a new intra-oral digital imaging system. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (Abstract): 463.
• http://www.soredex.com/pdf/Digora_optime_tech. pdf
• van der Stelt PF. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography.J Am Dent Assoc2008; 139; 7S-13S.
• Koch S, Wagner IV, Schneider W. Effective and quality- controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice. Int J Comput Dent 2000; 3(2): 107–118.
• Bhaskaran V, Qualtrough AJ, Rushton VE, Worthington HV, Horner K. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 645–52.
• Berkhout WE, Beuger DA, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 1–5.
• http://www.cliniciansreport.org/additional_study/2 005/05-02/comparison-chart.pdf
• http://www.cliniciansreport.org/additional_study/2 005/05-02/resolution.htm
• http://www.aadmrt.com/static.aspx?content=curre nts/farman_spring_04
• Berkhout E, Sanderink G, van der Stelt P. Digital intra-oral radiography in dentistry. Diagnostic efficacy and dose considerations. Oral Radiology 2003; 19: 1-13.