___

• Kitty MY, Stephen HY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997; 128: 1088-96.
• Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 2004;20:3–11.
• Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2007,Bas mda
• Kahler B, Kotousov A, Borkowski K. On fracture resistance of restored teeth. Key Engineering Materials Vol. 2005;245-51.
• Y lmaz EÖ, Ulusoy N. Farkl yöntemlerle haz rlanan s n f mikros z nt s n n de8erlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32;171-80. 6- Nalçac A, Ulusoy N. Farkl
• polimerizasyon zamanlar n n
• rezinlerin yüzey sertli8i üzerine etkileri. A.Ü. Di
• Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84 ,
• Manhart W, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitable of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132: 639-45.
• Altun C, Kabalay U, Güven G, Ba ak F, Akbulut E, pediatrik di yöntemlerinin restoratif materyalin polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerine etkileri. Gülhane T p Derg 2005; 47: 127-31.
• Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25–32.
• Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88–99.
• Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388– 95.
• Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147–53.
• Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10: 17- 22.
• Pyk N, Méjare I, Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate, Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57: 195– 200.
• Almqusit TC, Cowan RD, Lambert RL. Conservative amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:524-8.
• Nordbo H, Leirskar J, van der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
• Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factor for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26: 150-2
• Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.J Prosthet Dent 1980;43: 419-22.
• Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman E. Direct bonded Class I Quintessence Int 1994;25:155-9.
• Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.1: J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:155-9.
• Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30: 87-92.
• Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999;49:165–72.
• Sundberg H, Mejare I, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Swedish dentists’ decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:135–41
• Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated teeth. Pathways of the Pulp 8th ed. Mosby Inc. St Louis, USA, 2002: 765-795.
• Reeh ES, Douglass WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
• Gutmann JL The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic coniderations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-67.
• Potashnick SR, Weine FS, Strauss S. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Endodontic Therapy 4th ed. Mosby Inc, St Louis, USA, 1989: 653-98.
• Hernandez R, Bader S, Boston D, Trope M. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 281-4.
• Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Farkl restorasyon materyalleri ile restore edilmi endodontik tedavili di lerin k r lma dirençlerinin in vitro incelenmesi. A. Ü. Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14: 41-9.
• Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto- mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:576–85.
• Svaördström G. Mini preparationer for dagens kariessituation och material utbud. Odontologi 91. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1991.p. 67-79.
• Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004;17:253-6.
• Horsted-Bindslev P, Heyde-Petersen B, Simonsen P, Baelum V. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:233-8.
• Ercan E, Dülgergil ÇT, Y ld r m I, Dall M. Tünel restorasyonlar n daimi di lerdeki ba ar s : 3 y ll k takip çal mas . ADO Klinik Bilimleri Derg. Bas mda
• Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:171–5.
• Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int 1992;23:421-5.
• Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:42-7. Yaz?@ma Adresi: Ertu8rul ERCAN
• K r kkale Üniversitesi
• Di Hekimli8i Fakültesi
• Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi AD 71200, K r kkale.
• Tel: 0 3182244927 Faks: 0 3182243618
• e-mail: ertugrulercan@hotmail.com