The Investigation of Patterns of Iranian EFL learners’ Request Speech Act in Three Different Levels

Abstract. The present study is an investigation of Iranian EFL learners’ request speech act among learners with different English proficiency. This study attempts to find out the request strategies and also the degree of familiarity among three levels of participants according to Lakoff (1973) taxonomy. In order for the Iranian EFL learners’ language proficiency in the use of request speech act to be argued, the discourse completion test (DCT) was used. The DCT included six authentic request situations. The total number of students who took part in this study were 231 at three levels of MA (master of art), BA (bachelor of art), and UI (upper intermediate of institute). Based on the Z ratio test, the degree of formality and also the participants’ request strategies were analyzed. The results revealed that there are significant differences in the use of patterns among three levels of participants and also the degree of familiarity according to the levels of student changed but significantly most of learners tend to used deference taxonomy which showed medium degree of familiarity.

Keywords:

pragmatics, politeness, request speech act degree of familiarity, Iranian EFL learners,

PDF

___

Allami, H., & Nekouzadeh, M. (2011, novomber). Congratulation and Positive Politeness
Strategies in Iranian Contex. 10.4304/tpls.1.11.1607-1613, pp. 1607-1613.
Al-Zumor, A. W. (2010). Apologies in Arabic and English. Language and Translation, 19
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.
Bloomfield, L. (1956). Language. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Bottan, G. (n.d.). The oprationality of Grice's test for implicature. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions on politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56- 289). Cambridge: Cambridge.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Delen, B., & Tavil, Z. M. (2010). Evaluation of four courebooks in terms of three speech act:Request, Refusals, Complaints. Science Direct, 692-697.
Eslamirasekh, Z. (1993). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Request speech Act
Realization Patterns in Persian and American English. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 85- Fraser, B. (1990, April). Perspective on Politeness. 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N, pp. 219-2
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts (pp. 41-58). NY: Academic Press
Gruyter, M. d. (1992). Politeness in Language. Die Deutsche Biblothek.
GU, Y. (1990). Politness Phenomena in modern Chinese. Jornal of Pragmatics, 237-257.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
Kasper, G. (1997).Can pragmatic competence be taught? University of Hawaii: Second
Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on inter language pragmatics. In K. Rose &G.
Kasper (Eds.), pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, R. T. (2004). Language and Woman's Place. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. j. (2005, July 7). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. 1515/JPLR.2005.1.19, pp. 9-33.
Pariera, K. (2006). the use pf Politness strategies in email discussions about taboo topics.
PSU McNair Scholar Online Jornal, 9-23. Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (n.d.). Speech act therory and Pragmatics. D.Reidel publishing company. Tabatabaei, O., & Samiee, Z. (2013). Transfer of Requestive Speech Act from L1 to L2 in
Iranian EFL learners. Sciverse Science Direct, 239-244. w.Lafi, A. (n.d.). Direct and indirect speech act. Al Arabiye, 270-281. Watts, R. j. (2003). politeness. London: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Significant difference at 5% level - **Significant difference at 1% level

ISSN: 2587-2680
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2002
Yayıncı: SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ > FEN FAKÜLTESİ

Arşiv