On the relationship between students’ politeness and respect and teachers’ scoring in the classrooms

On the relationship between students’ politeness and respect and teachers’ scoring in the classrooms

Abstract. Politeness and respect can have serious effects on student-student as well as student-teacher relationships. In spite of undeniable importance of the relationship between students’ politeness and respect with teachers’ scoring, this relationship has been taken for granted in the previous research. Therefore, the presents study intended to investigate the relationship between students’ respect and politeness and the scores they receive from teachers. Findings revealed that there was significant relationship among students of three different educational levels (BA, MA and Ph.D.) and teachers’ scoring in terms of students’ politeness and respect. Also, it was further revealed that there was significant relationship between male and female students and teachers’ scoring in terms of students’ politeness and respect.

___

  • Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
  • Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Interaction ritual 5–45. New York Pantheon Books.
  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
  • Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (1981). Responsible classroom discipline: Creating positive learning environments and solving problems. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Lo, A., & Howard, K. M. (2009). Mobilizing respect and politeness in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 20(3), 211-216. [8] McDermott, R. P., & Gospodinoff, K. (1979). Social contexts for ethnic borders and school failure. In
  • A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 175–196). New York: Academic Press.
  • Rose, Mike, (2000). “Lives on the Boundary.” The Presence of Others. Ed. Marilyn Moller. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, p.106-115. [11] Scollon, R. ans S. W. Scollon (2001). Intercultural communication: a discourse approach. 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell
  • Thomas, David, (2000). “Lives on the Boundary.” The Presence of Others. Ed. Marilyn Moller. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, p.122.
  • Varenne, H., & McDermott, R. (1998). Successful failure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics (p.291). John Wiley & Sons. Sixth edition