An investigation of effect of different nuclear potentials on CDCC calculations: 11Be + 120Sn reaction

Aim of this study is to examine the effect of various potentials on continuum discretizedcoupled channel (CDCC) calculations. For this, the elastic scattering cross section of 11Beprojectile from 120Sn target is calculated by using ten different potentials. The results arecompared with experimental data.

PDF

___

[1] Gharaei R., Zanganeh V., Wang N., Systematic study of proximity potentials for heavy-ion fusion cross sections, Nucl. Phys. A, 979 (2018) 237-250.
[2] Bass R., Nucleus-Nucleus potential deduced from experimental fusion cross sections, Phys. Rev. lett., 39 (1977) 265.
[3] Reisdorf W., Heavy-ion reactions close to the Coulomb barrier, J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys., 20 (1994) 1297.
[4] Winther A., Dissipation, polarization and fluctuation in grazing heavy-ion collisions and the boundary to the chaotic regime, Nucl. Phys. A, 594 (1995) 203.
[5] Aygün M., Comparative analysis of proximity potentials to describe scattering of 13C projectile off 12C, 16O, 28Si and 208Pb nuclei, Revista Mex. De fisica. E, 64 (2018) 149-153.
[6] Aygun M., Alternative Potentials Analyzing the Scattering Cross Sections of 7,9,10,11,12,14Be Isotopes from a 12C target: Proximity Potentials, J. Korean Phy. Soc., 73 (2018) 1-8.
[7] Aygun M., The application of some nuclear potentials for quasielastic scattering data of the 11Li + 28Si reaction and its consequences, Turk. J. Phys., 42 (2018) 302-311.
[8] Aygün M., A comparison of proximity potentials in the analysis of heavy-ion elastic cross sections, Ukr. J. Phys., 63 (2018) 10.
[9] Takashina, M., Sakuragi, Y., Iseri, Y., Effect of halo structure on 11Be + 12C elastic scattering, Eur. Phys. J. A, 25 (2005) 273.
[10] Rusek K., Martel I., Sánchez-Benítez A.M., Acosta L.,10Be yıeld from 11Be + 120Sn interaction at the Coulomb barrier, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 43 (2012) 2.
[11] Deltuva A., Moro A. M., Cravo E., Nunes F. M., A. C. Fonseca, Three-body description of direct nuclear reactions: Comparison with the continuum discretized coupled channels method, Phys. Rev. C., 76 (2007) 064602.
[12] Di Pietro, A., Randisi, G., Scuderi, V., Acosta, L., Amorini, F., Borge, M. J. G., Figuera, P., Fisichella, M., Fraile, L. M., Gomes-Camacho, J. et al., Elastic scattering and reaction mechanisms of the halo nucleus 11Be around the coulomb barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 022701.
[13] Summers N. C. and Numes F.M., Core excitation in the elastic scattering and breakup of 11Be on protons, Phys. Rev. C, 76 (2007) 014611.
[14] Sparenberg J.M., Baye D., Imanishi B., Coupledreaction-channel calculations of the 16O+17O and 16O+17F charge-symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. C, 61 (2000) 054610.
[15] Becchetti F.D., Greenlees G.W., NucleonNucleus optical-model parameters,A>40,E<50MeV, Phys. Rev., 182 (1969) 1190-1209.
[16] Zhang G.L., Yao Y.J., Guo M.F., Pan M., Zhang G. X., Liu X.X., Comparative studies for different proximity potentials applied to large cluster radioactivity of nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A, 951 (2016) 86–96.
[17] Dutt I. and Puri R. K., Comparison of different proximity potentials for asymmetric colliding nuclei, Phys. Rev. C, 81 (2010) 064609.
[18] Blocki J., Randrup J, J., Swi¸atecki W.J., Tsang C.F., Proximity forces, Ann. Phys., 105( 2) (1977).
[19] Christensen P.R. and Winther A., The evidence of the ion-ion potentials from heavy ion elastic scattering, Phys.Lett. B, 65 (1976) 19.
[20] Ibraheem A. A., Analysis of deuteron-nucleus scattering using sao paulo potential, Braz. J. Phys., 46 (2016) 746–753.
[21] Ficenec J. R., Fajardo L. A., Trowe W. P. R, and Sick I., Elastic electron-tin scattering, Phys. Lett. B, 42 (1972) 213.
[22] Acosta L., Alvarez M.A.G., Andres M.V., Borge M.J.G., . Cortes M, J.M. Espino, Galaviz D., . Gomez-Camacho J, . Maira A, . Martel I, Moro A.M., Mukha I., Perez-Bernal F., Reillo E., Rodrıguez D., Rusek K. , Sanchez-Benıtez A.M., and Tengblad O., Signature of a strong coupling with the continuum in 11Be + 120Sn scattering at the Coulomb barrier, Eur. Phys. J. A, 42 (2009) 461–464.