Cultural Context: A Comparative Study of Raymond Carver's Cathedral and Ebrahim Golestan's the Stream and the Wall and the Thirst

Abstract. Both Raymond Carver and Ebrahim Golestan are widely acknowledged as writers who pay special attention to the form and language of their writings. This study starts with these two general characteristics of Carver's and Golestan's writings in order to search for the overt and covert features of prose in Raymond Carver's Cathedral and Ebrahim Golestan's The Stream and the Wall and the Thirst. The paper necessarily does its best to perform some kind of comparison between the two works of Carver and Golestan. Following a formal linguistic approach, the research traces one aspect of macro-level, cultural context, and tries to show some major manifestations of it in the stories of the two selected fictions. The research undertakes to find out whether these short story collections might act as architectures with similar cultural contexts. Reading Carver (1981) and Golestan (1351/1972) for the issue of cultural context, it can be concluded that although they both give a considerable attention to the structure of their stories as if they are building solid architectures out of carefully chosen linguistic units, they reflect different cultural believes and customs.

___

  • Bethea, Arthur F. (2006, Spring). Now this is Affirmation of Life: Raymond Carver's posthumously published stories. Journal of the Short Story in English, 46, 1-6. Retrieved March 17, 2013, from http://jsse.revues.org/index495.html
  • Bressler, Charles E. (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Bussmann, Hadumod. (1996). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. (Trans. & Eds. Gregory P. Trauth & Kerstin Kazzazi). London: Routledge.
  • Carver, Raymond. (1989a). Cathedral. New York: Vintage Contemporaries.
  • Carson, Phillip. (2000). Carver's Vision. Retrieved March 17, 2013, from http://cai.ucdavis.edu/enl3/carver%27svision.htm
  • Fowler, Roger. (1996). Linguistic Criticism (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, Keith, & LeBihan, Jill. (1996). Critical Theory and Practice: A Coursebook. London: Routledge.
  • Johnson, Keith, & Johnson, Helen. (1999). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied
  • Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching. Massachusetts: Blackwell. Kennedy, Gerald J. (Ed.). (1995). Modern American Short Story Sequences: Composite
  • Fictions and Fictive Communities. New York: Cambridge University Press. Nesset, Kirk. (1991). Reading Raymond Carver by Randolph Runyon. American Literature, 65, No.2, 384-385.
  • Ogden, Jane. (2002). Health and Construction of the Individual. New York: Routledge.
  • Renkema, Jan. (2004). Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, & Hamilton, Heidi E. (Eds). (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Massachusetts: Blackwell.
  • Selden, Raman, Widdowson, Peter, & Brooker, Peter. (2005). A Reader's Guide to
  • Contemporary Literary Theory (5th ed.). London: Pearson Longman Shuman, R. Baird. (Ed.). (2002). Great American Writers: Twentieth-Century (Vol.1). New
  • York: Marshal Cavendish Corporation. Wirag, Andreas. (2006). 'Bud' and 'The Baker': the Design of Raymond Carver's
  • Disconnected (Seminar paper). Munich: GRIN Publishing GmbH. Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.