Glioblastoma Multiforme’de Konkomitant ve Adjuvant Temozolomid’in Prognoz ve Sağkalıma Etkisi

Amaç: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) erişkinde en sık görülen malign primer beyin tümörüdür. GBM tedavi sonrası izlemde en sık karşılaşılan problem lokal kontrolün sağlanamamasıdır. Bu çalışmada amaç, GBM'de cerrahi sonrası radyoterapi ve Temozolomid (TMZ) tedavisi alan olguların, cerrahi sonrası sadece radyoterapi tedavisi alan olgunlara göre TMZ 'in etkinlik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve yöntemler: GBM teşhisi almış olgular iki gruba ayrıldı. Birinci grup cerrahi sonrası sadece radyoterapi tedavisi gören olgular, ikinci grup ise (kombine tedavi grubu) cerrahi sonrası radyoterapi ve TMZ tedavisi gören olgular olarak ayırıldı. Cerrahi sonrası radyoterapi ve TMZ tedavisi alan 28 olgu ve cerrahi sonrası sadece radyoterapi verdiğimiz 26 olgu çalışmaya alınmıştır. Tüm olgulara lokal fraksiyone radyoterapi (60 Gy toplam doz: 2 Gyx5 gün/hafta, 6 hafta boyunca) uygulandı. Sadece ikinci gruba konkomitan olarak oral yoldan 75 mg/m2/gün 7gün/hafta, 6 hafta boyunca monoterapi olarak 200 mg/m2/gün 5gün, altı siklus her 28 günde bir TMZ uygulandı. TMZ prognoz ve sağkalım üzerine etkisine ilave olarak yaş, cinsiyet ve rezeksiyon boyutunun her iki grupta progresyonsuz sağkalım süresi (PSS) ve genel sağkalım süresi (GSS) üzerine etkisi değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Her iki gruptada önemli prognostik faktörlerden, yaş ve cinsiyet için hem PSS, hem de GSS bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan yarar saptanırken, rezeksiyon boyutu (total-subtotal) için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yarar saptandı. Çalışma sonucunda PSS, kombine tedavi grubunda 14 ay, tek başına radyoterapi grubunda ise 6 ay idi (P<0.0001). GSS, kombine tedavi grubunda 16 ay, tek başına radyoterapi gurubunda ise 12.5 ay idi (P=0,0354). Sonuç: Total cerrahi tedavi sonrası kombine (RT + TMZ) tedavi, tek başına radyoterapiye göre prognoz ve sağkalım üzerinde daha etkili olduğu saptanmıştır.

Effect of Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide on Prognosis and Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Objective: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. The most common problem in the follow-up after GBM treatment is the lack of local control. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Temozolomide (TMZ) in cases who received post-surgical radiotherapy and TMZ treatment in GBM compared to cases who received only radiotherapy treatment after surgery. Materials and Methods: The cases diagnosed with GBM were divided into two groups. The first group was divided into cases that received only radiotherapy after surgery, and the second group (combined treatment group) was divided into cases that received post-surgical radiotherapy and TMZ treatment. 28 cases who received radiotherapy and TMZ treatment after surgery and 26 cases who received only radiotherapy after surgery were included in the study. Local fractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy total dose: 2 Gyx5 days/week for 6 weeks) was applied to all cases. Only in the second group, 75 mg/m2/day 7 days/week orally, 200 mg/m2/day 5 days as monotherapy for 6 weeks, and six cycles of TMZ every 28 days were administered concomitantly. In addition to the effect of TMZ on prognosis and survival, the effects of age, gender, and resection size on progression-free survival (PSS) and overall survival (GSS) were evaluated in both groups. Results: There was no statistically significant benefit in terms of both PFS and OS in both groups for age and gender, a statistically significant benefit was found for resection size (total-subtotal). At the end of the study, PFS was 14 months in the combined treatment group and 6 months in the radiotherapy alone group (P<0.0001). OS was 16 months in the combined treatment group and 12.5 months in the radiotherapy alone group (P=0.0354). Conclusion: Combined (RT + TMZ) treatment after total surgical treatment was found to be more effective on prognosis and survival than radiotherapy alone.

___

  • 1.Grochans S, Cybulska AM, Simińska D, et al. Epidemiology of Glioblastoma Multiforme–Literature Review. Cancers. 2022; 14(10): 2412-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102412
  • 2.Perry A, Wesseling P. Histologic classification of gliomas. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 134: 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802997-8.00005-0.
  • 3.Batash R, Asna N, Schaffer P, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme, diagnosis and treatment; recent literature review. Current medicinal chemistry. 2017; 24(27): 3002-09. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170516123206
  • 4.Makowska M, Smolarz B, Romanowicz H. microRNAs (miRNAs) in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)—Recent Literature Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4): 3521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043521
  • 5.Ozawa T, Faddegon AB, Hu JL. Response of ıntracerebral human glioblastoma xenografts to multifraction radiation exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:263-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.010
  • 6.Iturrioz-Rodríguez N, Sampron N, Matheu A. Current advances in temozolomide encapsulation for the enhancement of glioblastoma treatment. Theranostics. 2023; 13(9): 2734-56. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.82005
  • 7.Janjua TI, Cao Y, Ahmed-Cox A, et al. Efficient delivery of Temozolomide using ultrasmall large-pore silica nanoparticles for glioblastoma. J Control Release. 2023; 357: 161-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.040
  • 8.Mason WP, Cairncross JG. Drug Insight: temozolomide as a treatment for malignant gliomaimpact of a recent trial. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2005; 1: 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0045
  • 9.Major N, Patel NA, Bennett J, et al. The Current State of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors: An Overview of Post-Radiotherapy Neurocognitive Decline and Outcomes. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(7): 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071050
  • 10.Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987-96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330
  • 11.Woo PYM, Law THP, Lee KKY, et al. Repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma in the temozolomide era: a real-world multi-centre study. Br J Neurosurg. 2023; 18: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2167931
  • 12.Di L, Shah AH, Mahavadi A, et al. Radical supramaximal resection for newly diagnosed left-sided eloquent glioblastoma: safety and improved survival over gross-total resection. J Neurosurg. 2022; 138(1): 62-9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.3.JNS212399
  • 13.Rykkje AM, Larsen VA, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, et al. Timing of Early Postoperative MRI following Primary Glioblastoma Surgery-A Retrospective Study of Contrast Enhancements in 311 Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4): 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040795
  • 14.Stupp R, Dietrich PY, Ostermann Kraljevic S, et al. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(5): 1375-82. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1375
  • 15.Reardon DA, Egorin MJ, Quinn JA, et al. Phase II study of imatinib mesylate plus hydroxyurea in adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 36: 9359-68. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2185
  • 16.Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E, et al. Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 10:2372-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.00.331
  • 17.Huang B, Yu Z, Liang R. Effect of long-term adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy on primary glioblastoma patient survival. BMC Neurol. 2021; 21(1): 424. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02461-9
  • 18.Revilla-Pacheco F, Rodríguez-Salgado P, Barrera-Ramírez M, et al. Extent of resection and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(25): e26432. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026432
  • 19.Fariña Nuñez MT, Franco P, Cipriani D, et al. Resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme in elderly patients: a pseudo-randomized analysis revealed clinical benefit. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2020; 146: 381-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03393-z
  • 20.Leal-Noval SR, Casado M, Palomares C, et al. Prospective assessment of platelet function in patients undergoing elective resection of glioblastoma multiforme. Platelets. 2023; 34(1): 2216802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2023.2216802
Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Merthan Tunay
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sistinozis Hastalarının Değerlendirilmesi ve Kronik Böbrek Hastalığı İlişkili Faktörler

Begüm AVCI, Gönül PARMAKSIZ

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Anesthesia Management and Clinical Outcomes in Cesarean Section Surgery

İlsev BABAOĞLAN, Demet LAFLI TUNAY, Murat Türkeün ILGINEL, Nazlı TOTİK DOĞAN

Malign plevral efüzyonlarda küçük çaplı plevral drenaj kateteri (Easydren®) ile minimal invaziv yaklaşım

Hıdır ESME, Yunus Emre ERDİRİL

The Postoperative Analgesic Effect Of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Undergoing inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study

Selda ÇELİK İLHAN, Zeliha TUNCEL, Mehtap ÖZDEMİR, Özlem DELİGÖZ

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and p16/p53 protein status in different subtypes of endometrial carcinoma: with emphasis on tumor aggressiveness

Aysun FİRAT

LOMBER MİKRODİSKEKTOMİ AMELİYATINDA AMELİYAT SONRASI HIZLANDIRILMIŞ İYİLEŞME (ERAS) PROTOKOLLERİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ

Murat Türkeün ILGINEL, Kadir OKTAY, Özge ÖZDEN, Demet LAFLI TUNAY, Ebru BİRİCİK, Feride KARACAER, Mazhar ÖZSOY, Nuri Eralp ÇETİNALP, Yasemin GÜNEŞ

Zor Hava Yoluna Neden Olabilen Pediyatrik Sendromlar

Ebru BİRİCİK

Erken Evre Relapsing-Remitting Multipl Skleroz Hastalarında Talamus Alanı ile Bilişsel İşlevler Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi

Selahattin AYAS, Sibel CANBAZ KABAY

Robust Detection of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Support Vector Machines and Flow Cytometry

Barış BORAL

Vazovagal Senkopun Yapısal Bir Temeli Var mı? Vazovagal Senkoplu Hastalarda Kardiyak Fonksiyonlar

Erkan ALPASLAN, Ümmü TAŞ, Sedat TAŞ, Ebru OZPELIT