The Prevalence of Paranasal Sinus Anatomic Variations on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan Images of Turkish Populationanatomical
The Prevalence of Paranasal Sinus Anatomic Variations on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan Images of Turkish Populationanatomical
Objectives: The paranasal sinuses include anatomic structures at the maxillofacial region that matters great importance for the surgeons working in the maxillofacial area. The imaging of anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses is fundamental to evaluate the predisposing factors for the pathologic changes of paranasal sinuses. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses by retrospective assessment of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
___
- [1] de Oliveira AG, dos Santos Silveira O, Francio LA, de Andrade
Marigo Grandinetti H, Manzi FR. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2013; 35:
535-8.
- [2] Mendiratta V, Baisakhiya N, Singh D, Datta G, Mittal A,
Mendiratta P. Sinonasal Anatomical Variants: CT and
Endoscopy Study and Its Correlation with Extent of Disease.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 68: 352-8.
- [3] Huang BY, Lloyd KM, DelGaudio JM, Jablonowski E, Hudgins
PA. Failed endoscopic sinus surgery: spectrum of CT findings in
the frontal recess. Radiographics 2009; 29: 177-195.
- [4] Musy PY, Kountakis SE. Anatomic findings in patients
undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Am. J.
Otolaryngo. 2004; 25: 418-422.
- [5] Khalil HS, Eweiss AZ, Clifton N. Radiological findings in patients
undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective
case series study. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2011;7:11:4.
[6] Wani AA, Kanotra S, Lateef M, Ahmad R, Qazi SM, Ahmad S. CT
scan evaluation of the anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal
complex. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 61: 163-
8.
[7] Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ,
Stammberger H. Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements
for endoscopic surgery. Radiology. 1987; 163: 769-75.
- [8] Namdar Pekiner F. Anatomic Variations of Paranasal Sinus
on Multidetector Computed Tomography Examinations for
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. MÜSBED 2013; 3: 102-
106.
- [9] Leunig A, Sommer B, Betz CS, Sommer F. Surgical anatomy
of the frontal recess—is there a benefit in multiplanar CTreconstruction?
Rhinology 2008; 46: 188-194.
- [10] Sillers MJ, Kuhn FA, Vickery CL. Radiation exposure in paranasal
sinus imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 112:248-
251.
- [11] Bent JP, Cuilty-Siller C, Kuhn FA. The frontal cell as a cause of
frontal sinus obstruction. Am. J. Rhinol. 1994; 8: 185-191.
- [12] Kew J, Rees G, Close D, Sdralis T, Sebben, R, Wormald PJ.
Multiplanar reconstructed CT images improves depiction and
understanding of the anatomy of the frontal sinus and recess.
Am. J. Rhinol. 2002; 16:119-123.
- [13] Lee WT, Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ. 3D computed tomographic
analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal
sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131:164-173.
- [14] Donizeth-Rodrigues C, Fonseca-Da Silveira M, Gonçalves-De
Alencar AH, Garcia-Santos-Silva MA, Francisco-De-Mendonça
E, Estrela C. Three-dimensional images contribute to the
diagnosis of mucous retention cyst in maxillary sinus. Med.
Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2013; 18:e151-157.
- [15] Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonça EF. Occurrence of
maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in
asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health 2012; 10; 12:30.
- [16] Park SS, Yoon BN, Cho KS, Roh HJ. Pneumatization pattern of
the frontal recess: relationship of the anterior-to-posterior
length of frontal isthmus and/or frontal recess with the volume
of agger nasi cell. Clin. Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3:76-83.
- [17] Arslan H, Aydinlioğlu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E. Anatomic variations
of the paranasal sinuses: CT examination for endoscopic sinus
surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999; 26: 39-48.
- [18] Kantarci M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbas O, Okur A, Karaman
A. Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region
and their clinical importance. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 50: 296-302.
- [19] Pekiner FM, Borahan MO, Dumlu A, Özbayrak S. Infraorbital
ethmoid (Haller) cells: A Cone-beam computed tomographic
study. Oral Radiol. 2014; 30: 219-225.
- [20] Basic N, Basic V, Jukic T, Basic M, Jelic M, Hat J. Computed
tomographic imaging to determine the frequency of
anatomical variations in pneumatization of the ethmoid bone.
Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 1999; 256: 69–71.
- [21] Luxenberger W, Anderhuber W, Stammberger H. Mucocele in
an orbitoethmoidal (Haller’s) cell (accidentally combined with
acute contralateral dacryocystitis). Rhinology. 1999; 37: 37–9.
- [22] Chmielik LP, Chmielik A. The prevalence of the onodi cell –
Most suitable method of CT evaluation in its detection. Int J
Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 97: 202-205.
- [23] Kandukuri R, Phatak S. Evaluation of sinonasal diseases by
computed tomography. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:TC09-TC12.
- [24] Kew J, Rees G, Close D, Sdralis T, Sebben, R, Wormald PJ.
Multiplanar reconstructed CT images improves depiction and
understanding of the anatomy of the frontal sinus and recess.
Am J Rhinol. 2002; 16: 119-23.
- [25] Coates MH, Whyte AM, Earwaker JW. Frontal recess air cells:
spectrum of CT appearances. Australas Radiol. 2003; 47: 4-10.
- [26] Al Abduwani J, ZilinSkiene L, Colley S, Ahmed S. Cone beam CT
paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose
multidetector CT studies. Am J Otolaryngol. 2016; 37: 59-64.
- [27] Rafferty MA, Siewerdsen JH, Chan Y, Moseley DJ, Daly MJ,
Jaffray DA et al. Investigation of C-Arm Cone-Beam CT-guided
surgery of the frontal recess. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:2138-
43.
- [28] Zoumalan RA, Lebowitz RA, Wang E, Yung K, Babb JS, Jacobs JB.
Flat panel cone beam computed tomography of the sinuses.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140: 841-4.
- [29] Güldner C, Ningo A, Voigt J, Diogo I, Heinrichs J, Weber R et
al. Potential of dosage reduction in cone-beam-computed
tomography (CBCT) for radiological diagnostics of the paranasal
sinuses.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 270: 1307-15.
- [30] Wormald PJ, Chan SZX. Surgical techniques for the removal of
frontal recess cells obstructing the frontal ostium. Am J Rhinol
2003; 17: 221-226.
- [31] Sagar GR, Jha BC, Meghanadh KR. A study of anatomy of frontal
recess in patients suffering from ‘chronic frontal sinus disease’.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 65: 435-439.
- [32] Han D, Zhang L, Ge W, Tao J, Xian J, Zhou B. Multiplanar
computed tomographic analysis of the frontal recess region in
Chinese subjects without frontal sinus disease symptoms. ORL
J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008; 70: 104-12.
- [33] Talaiepour AR, Sazgar AA, Bagheri A. Anatomic variations of
the paranasal sinuses on CT scan Images. J Dent of Tehran Unv
MS. 2005; 2: 142-46.
- [34] Chaiyasate S, Baron I, Clement P. Analysis of paranasal sinus
development and anatomical variations: a CT genetic study in
twins. Clin Otolaryngol. 2007; 32: 93-7.
- [35] Kayalioglu G, Oyar O, Govsa F. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus
bony variations: a computed tomographic study. Rhinology.
2000; 38: 108-13.
- [36] Badia L, Lund VJ, Wei W, Ho WK. Ethnic variation in sinonasal
anatomy on CT-scanning. Rhinology. 2005; 43: 210-4.
- [37] Angélico Jr FV, Rapoport PB. Analysis of the Agger nasi cell and
frontal sinus ostium sizes using computed tomography of the
paranasal sinuses. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 79: 285-92.
- [38] Horner K, Jacobs R, Schulze R. Dental CBCT equipment and
performance issues. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013; 153: 212-
218.
- [39] Turna, Ö, Aybar MD, Karagöz, Y, Tuzcu, G. Anatomic variations
of the paranasal sinus region: Evaluation with multidetector
CT. İstanbul Med J. 2014; 15: 104-9.
- [40] Aramani A, Karadi RN, Kumar S. A. Study of anatomical
variations of osteomeatal complex in chronic rhinosinusitis
patients-CT findings. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: KC01-4.
- [41] Caversaccio M., Boschung U., Mudry A. Historical review of
Hallers cells. Ann. Anat. 2011; 193: 185–190.
- [42] Fadda GLRosso, S, Aversa S, Petrelli A, Ondolo C, Succo G.
Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal
sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta
Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012; 32: 244-25.
- [43] Göçmen G, Borahan MO, Aktop S, Dumlu A, Pekiner FN, Göker
K. Effect of septal deviation, concha bullosa and Haller’s cell
on maxillary sinus’s inferior pneumatization; a retrospective
study. Open Dent J. 2015; 31: 282-6.
- [44] Turkdogan FT, Turkdogan KA, Dogan M, Atalar MH. Assessment
of sphenoid sinus related anatomic variations with computed
tomography. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 13;27: 109.
- [45] Meybodi AT, Vigo V, Benet A. The Onodi Cell: An Anatomic
illustration. World Neurosurg. 2017;103: 950.e5-950.e6.
- [46] Senturk M, Guler I, Azgin I, Sakarya EU, Ovet G, Alatas N,
Tolu I, Erdur O. The role of Onodi cells in sphenoiditis: results
of multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography
scanning. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 83: 88-93.