Çiğdem Gamze ÖZKAN, Yeter KURT, Şule BIYIK BAYRAM, Betül BAYRAK, Kadriye ÖZKOL KILINÇ

THE EFFECT OF GROUP FOCUSED CASE STUDY ON NANDA-I NURSING DIAGNOSIS IDENTIFICATION AND PERCEPTION IN NURSING STUDENTS

Objective: To identify the impact of group case studies on the accurate nursing diagnosis of the students and their perception of NANDA International nursing diagnoses. Method: The sample comprised 164 nursing students from a Department of Nursing in a university. Data was collected with the descriptive characteristics form, Perception of Nursing Diagnoses Scale, students’ opinion about nursing diagnoses form and care plan assessment form. A researcher offered four hours of theoretical training about the nursing process and NANDA International nursing diagnoses. Training was conducted by a researcher after training, the students filled out descriptive characteristics form and the Perception of Nursing Diagnoses Scale. Thereafter, the students were randomly divided into five groups. Each group made two case studies with a researcher every week. After the completion of case studies, the students filled out the forms again. Results: It was determined that the majority (89.6%) of the students were able to make accurate NANDA International diagnoses after case studies. The total score of the students in perception of nursing diagnoses was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Statistically significant difference was obtained in the negative way in the clear representation of patient situation subscale and in the positive way in the ease of use subscale of the scale (p<0.05). Conclusion: Almost of the students were able to determine the accurate NANDA International nursing diagnosis and it didn’t have an effect on the students' perception of nursing diagnoses, but the scale's ease of use subscale had a positive impact.

Keywords:

Group study, nursing diagnosis, nursing students, case study,

PDF

___

[1]. Karadakovan, A. and Ö.U. Yeşilbakan, Öğrencilerin Nörolojik hastalarda saptadiklari NANDA hemşirelik tanilarinin incelenmesi. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 2004. 7(3).
[2]. Avşar, G., et al., Hemşirelerin hasta bakiminda kullandiklari hemşirelik sürecİ uygulamalarinin değerlendirilmesİ. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 2014. 17(4).
[3]. Müller‐Staub, M., et al., Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 2007. 18(1): p. 5-17.
[4]. Müller‐Staub, M., et al., Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: The Q‐DIO. J Clin Nurs, 2009. 18(7): p. 1027-1037.
[5]. Akın-Korhan, E., et al., Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Hemşirelik Tanılarının Belirlenmesi ve Nanda Tanılarına Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2015. 5(1): p. 16-21.
[6]. Herdman, T.H. and S. Kamitsuru, eds. NANDA Interbational Nursing Diagnoses 2015-17: Definitions and Classification. 2014, Wiley Blackwell: Oxford. 3-10.
[7]. Tambağ, H. and R. Can, Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin psikiyatri hemşireliği dersi uygulamalarında NANDA hemşirelik tanılarını belirleme düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Hemşirelik E‐Dergisi, 2014. 2(3): p. 12-20.
[8]. Halverson, E.L., et al., Minnesota nurses' perceptions of nursing diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 2011. 22(3): p. 123-132.
[9]. Akin-Korhan, E., et al., Hemşirelik tanılarını algılama ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Turkish Journal of Research & Development in Nursing, 2013. 15(3).
[10]. Frisch, N.C. and J.H. Kelley, Nursing diagnosis and nursing theory: exploration of factors inhibiting and supporting simultaneous use. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 2002. 13(2): p. 53-61.
[11]. Simpson, E. and M.D. Courtney, Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. Int J Nurs Pract, 2002. 8(April): p. 89-98.
[12]. Rhodes, M.L. and C. Curran, Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. Comput Inform Nurs, 2005. 23(5): p. 256-262.
[13]. Popil, I., Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Educ Today, 2011. 31(2): p. 204-207.
[14]. Kunselman, J.C. and K.A. Johnson, Using the case method to facilitate learning. College Teaching, 2004. 52(3): p. 87-92.
[15]. Terzioğlu, F., et al., Travmalı Hasta Vakalarında Öğrenci Hemşirelerin Hemşirelik Tanılarını Ve Girişimlerini Belirleyebilme Durumları. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 2012. 15(2).
[16]. Bekmezci, B. and M. Ünlü, Coğrafya öğretiminde grupla çalışma metodunun öğrenci başarısına etkisi. 2007.
[17]. Bushell, G., Moderation of peer assessment in group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2006. 31(1): p. 91-108.
[18]. Erdamar, G. and H. Demirel, Öğretmen adaylarının grup çalışmalarına ilişkin algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2010. 11(3): p. 205-223.
[19]. Karaca, T. and S. Aslan, Effect of ‘nursing terminologies and classifications’ course on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnosis. Nurse Educ Today, 2018.
[20]. Andsoy, I.I., et al., Hemşirelerin bakım planını kullanırken yaşadıkları güçlükler. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 2013. 3(2): p. 1-7.
[21]. Ogunfowokan, A.A., et al., Student Nurses' Perceived Use of NANDA‐I Nursing Diagnoses in the Community Setting. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2013. 24(1): p. 37-43.
[22]. Olsen, G., M. Frost, and K. Orth, Nurses' Perception of Nursing Diagnosis. 1991.
[23]. Yilmaz, F.T., S. Sabanciogullari, and K. Aldemir, The opinions of nursing students regarding the nursing process and their levels of proficiency in Turkey. Scand J Caring Sci, 2015. 4(4): p. 265.
[24]. Keski, Ç. and A. Karadağ, Hemşirelik Son Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Hemşirelik Süreci Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Research & Development in Nursing, 2010. 12(1).
[25]. Uysal, N., et al., Hemşirelik İkinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bakım Planlarındaki Hemşirelik Tanıları Ve Verilerin Analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2016. 3(1): p. 139-143.
[26]. Karadag, M., N. Calıskan, and O. Iseri, Effects of Case Studies and Simulated Patients on Students' Nursing Care Plan. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2016. 27(2): p. 87-94.
[27]. Farren, A.T., An educational strategy for teaching standardized nursing languages. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 2010. 21(1): p. 3-13.
[28]. Abed El‐Rahman, M., M.T. Al Kalaldeh, and M.Z. Malak, Perceptions and Attitudes Toward NANDA‐I Nursing Diagnoses: A Cross‐Sectional Study of J ordanian Nursing Students. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2017. 28(1): p. 13-18.
[29]. Lee, T.T., Nursing diagnoses: factors affecting their use in charting standardized care plans. J Clin Nurs, 2005. 14(5): p. 640-647.
[30]. Türk, G., E. Tuğrul, and M. Şahbaz, Determination of nursing diagnoses used by students in the first clinical practice. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2013. 24(3): p. 129-133.
[31]. Taşdemir, G. and M. Kızılkaya, Evaluation of NANDA nursing diagnoses of healthcare college final year students during the clinical application of the mental health and disease nursing course Sağlık yüksekokulu son sınıf öğrencilerin ruh sağlığı ve hastalıkları hemşireliği dersi klinik uygulamasında NANDA hemşirelik tanılarının incelenmesi. 2013, 2013. 10(1): p. 12.
[32]. Hakverdioğlu Yönt, G., L. Khorshid, and İ. Eşer, Examination of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students and their opinions about nursing diagnoses. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif, 2009. 20(4): p. 162-168.
[33]. Gök Özer, F. and N. Kuzu, The status of students’ use of nursing process and NANDA diagnoses in their care plans. Ege University Journal of Nursing, 2006. 22: p. 68-80.