The Effect of Elemantel Sulfur Fertilization on Green Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Calcareous Soil

The Effect of Elemantel Sulfur Fertilization on Green Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Calcareous Soil

In our country, most of the bean cultivation areas, are in the Central Anatolia Region. This study was carried out to determine the sulphureous fertilizer demand of beans grown in the calcareous soils of the region under field conditions in Konya. Early "seat bean" variety was used as a plant material. In the experiment, elemental - sulphur (S) was applied to the parcels at the doses of “0-20-40-80 kg S/da. At the end of the experiment, leaf chlorophyll SPAD values showed a significant increase in the plots where the highest sulfur dose was applied. Parcel yield and leaf surface area increased significantly with increasing sulfur doses (P

___

  • Abd-Elfattah AA, Hilal MH. 1985. Effect of S application on some properties of Egyptian desert soils. In Proc. Arab Reg. Conf. on Sulphur and Its Usages in the Arab Countries. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, pp. 2-5.
  • Akay A, Seker C, Negis H. 2019. Effect of enhanced elemental sulphur doses on pH value of a calcareous soil. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Tarım Bil Derg, 29: 34-40.
  • Anonymous. 2021. URL: https://pratiktarim.com/taze-fasulye-cesitleri/ (access date: March 11, 2022).
  • Anonymous. 2022a. Tarimsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü (TEPGE) Enstitümüz tarım, gıda, çevre ve kırsal kalkınma konularında ekonomik araştırma. Kuru Fasulye - Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. URL: https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr (access date: March 11, 2022).
  • Anonymous. 2022b. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/439012/potential-supply-of-sulfur-fertilizer-worldwide/ (access date: March 11, 2022).
  • Anonymous. 2022c. URL: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/newsrelease/2021/11/05/2328565/28124/en/Global-Sulfur-Fertilizers-Market-Research-Report-2021-to-2026-by-Type-Formulation Crop-Type-Application-and Region.html/ (access date: March 11, 2022).
  • Barton CJ. 1948. Photometric analysis of phosphate rock. Anal Chem, 20(11): 1068-1073.
  • Bayraklı F. 1987. Toprak ve bitki analizleri (Çeviri ve Derleme) OMÜ, Zir Fak, Yay No: 17, Samsun, Türkiye, pp. 194.
  • Bremler JM. 1965. Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI, US.
  • Bouyoucos GJ. 1951. A Recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils 1. Agronomy J, 43(9): 434-438.
  • Burns GR. 1967. Oxidation of sulfur in soils. Technical Bul Number 13. The Sulphur Institute, Washington, DC, US.
  • Cassel DK, Nielsen DR. 1986. Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Klute, A., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, US, pp. 901-926.
  • Düzgüneş O. 1963. İstatistik - prensip ve metotlari. Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası, İzmir, Türkiye, pp. 375.
  • Erdal İ, Gülser F, Tüfenkçi Ş, Sağlam M, Karaca S. 2002. Kükürtlü gübrelemenin kireçli bir toprakta mısır bitkisi (Zea mays L.) gelişimi ve bitki fosfor alımına etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv Fen Bil Enst Derg, 7(1): 37-42.
  • Eyuboglu F. 1999. Fertility of Turkish Soils. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications.
  • Fageria NK, Santos AB. 2008. Yield physiology of dry bean. J Plant Nutr, 31: 983-1004.
  • Fox RL, Olson RA, Rhoades HF. 1964. Evaluating the Sulfur Status of Soils by Plant and Soil Tests. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800020034xCitations: 133.
  • Ganie MA, Akhter F, Bhat MA, Najar GR. 2014. Growth yield and quality of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as influenced by sulphur and boron application on inceptisols of Kashmir. The Bioscan, 9(2): 513-518.
  • Gupta VK, Mehla DS. 1980. Influence of sulphur on the yield and concentration of copper, manganese, iron and molybdenum in berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) grown on two different soils. Plant and Soil, 56(2): 229-234.
  • Hussain K, Islam M, Siddique MT, Hayat R, Mohsan S. 2011. Soybean growth and nitrogen fixation as affected by sulfur fertilization and inoculation under rainfed conditions in Pakistan. Int J Agri Biol, 13(6): 951-955.
  • Jackson ML. 1969. Soil chemical analysis-advanced course. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course. Edition 2, US, pp. 1790.
  • Jones JB. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC press, Wales, UK, pp. 384.
  • Kacar B, Katkat V. 2021. Bitki besleme. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Türkiye, pp. 678.
  • Kaya M, Küçükyumuk Z, Erdal I. 2009. Effects of elemental sulfur and sulfur-containing waste on nutrient concentrations and growth of bean and corn plants grown on a calcareous soil. African J Biotechnol, 8(18): 4481-4489.
  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper 1. Soil Sci Soc America J, 42(3): 421-428.
  • Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Rosolem CA, Fageria NK, Guimarães PTG. 1987. Sulfur responses of Brazilian crops. J Plant Nutri, 10: 2153-2158.
  • Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press, the Netherlands, pp. 889.
  • Mascagni HJJr, Harrison SA, Padgett GB. 2008. Influence of sulfur fertility on wheat yield performance on alluvial and upland soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 39: 2133-2145.
  • Neilsen D, Hogue EJ, Hoyt PB, Drought BG. 1993. Oxidation of elemental sulfur and acidification of calcareous orchard soils in southern British Columbia. Can J Soil Sci, 73:103-114.
  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Anal Cheml Methods, SSSA Book Series, New York, US, pp. 961-1010.
  • Olsen LE, Sommers SR. 1982. Phosphorus, In: Page, A.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, US, pp. 403-430.
  • Orman Ş, Kaplan M. 2017. Agronomic biofortification of green bean (Phaselous vulgaris L.) with elemental sulphur and farmyard manure. App Ecol Environ Res, 15(4): 2061-2069.
  • Pandurangan S, Marsolais F. 2015. Determining sulfur-limiting conditions for studies of seed composition in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In Molecular Physiology and Ecophysiology of Sulfur. Springer, Cham, US, pp. 207-213.
  • Procopıou J, Wallace A, Alexander GV. 1976. Microelement composition of plants grown with low to high levels of sulfur applied to calcareous soil in a glasshouse. Plant and Soil, 44: 359-365.
  • Soliman MF, Kostandi SF, Van Beusichem ML. 1992. Influence of sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer on the uptake of iron, manganese, and zinc by corn plants grown in calcareous soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 23(11-12): 1289-1300.
  • Staff US Salinity Lab. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agri Handbook, 60: 83-100.
  • Stewart BA, Porter LK. 1969. Nitrogen‐sulfur relationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), corn (Zea mays), and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) 1. Agronomy J, 61(2): 267-271.
  • Teame G, Mengistu DK, Araya T. 2020. Effects of combined application of phosphorus and sulfur fertilizers on agronomic traits and protein content of supplementary irrigated haricot bean (Phaseolus Vulgarıs) varieties in Raya Valley Northern Ethiopia. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev, 20(1): 15383-15401.
  • Togay Y, Togay N, Erman M, Dogan Y. 2008. Performance of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as influenced by phosphorus and sulphur fertilization. Indian J Agri Sci, 78(4): 299.
  • Yıldız N. 2008. Bitki beslemenin esasları ve bitkilerde beslenme bozukluğu belirtileri. Eser Ofset Matbaacılık, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp. 304.
  • Yurtsever N. 1984. Deneysel İstatistik Metodları. T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No:121, Teknik Yayın No:56, Ankara, Tukey.
Black Sea Journal of Agriculture-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Hasan ÖNDER