Alterations in Corneal Biomechanical and Topographic Features After Accelerated Crosslinking: 1-Year Results

Objectives: To determine the biomechanical and topographic alterations within the first year after accelerated crosslink-ing (CXL) treatment in patients with keratoconus. Methods: In this prospective study, 52 eyes of 52 patients with progressive keratoconus underwent accelerated CXL were included. All patients had a detailed preoperative ophthalmologic examination, including slit-lamp evaluation, Gold-mann tonometry, fundoscopy, topography by Scheimpflug imaging (Sirius), and corneal biomechanical evaluation with a biomechanical waveform analysis device (ORA). Alterations in visual acuity and topographic findings were evaluated before the treatment and at 12 months follow-up. Corneal biomechanical features were obtained before the treatment, and at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months. Results: Uncorrected-visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity both statistically significantly improved at 12th month (p=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in keratometry values, whereas maximum K (AKfront) and symmetry index front (SIfront) decreased significantly (p=0.015 and p=0.009, respectively). Corneal thinnest point and volume also decreased significantly at 12th month (p=0.001 for both). Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) values transiently increased in the first three months, while corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) transiently decreased, with the difference not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, central corneal thickness significantly decreased at the end of the 12th month (p=0.001). Conclusion: Accelerated CXL seems to be effective in stopping the progression of keratoconus. Our findings showed transient alterations in biomechanical features, which will end with the preoperative values at the end of the 12th month. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the changes in corneal biomechanics in vivo.

Kaynakça

Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Ker-atoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:157–66.

Farjadnia M, Naderan M. Corneal cross-linking treatment of keratoconus. Oman J Ophthalmol 2015;8:86–91.

Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620–7.

Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in kerato-conus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:796– 801.

Wittig-Silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, Wu T, Whiting M, Snibson GR. A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-year results. Ophthal-mology 2014;121:812–21.

Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T. Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Oph-thalmol 2010;149:585–93.

Brindley GS. The Bunsen-Roscoe law for the human eye at very short durations. J Physiol 1952;118:135–9.

Wernli J, Schumacher S, Spoerl E, Mrochen M. The efficacy of corneal cross-linking shows a sudden decrease with very high intensity UV light and short treatment time. Invest OphthalmolVis Sci 2013;54:1176–80.

Schumacher S, Oeftiger L, Mrochen M. Equivalence of biome-chanical changes induced by rapid and standard cornealcross-linking, using riboflavin and ultraviolet radiation. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:9048–52.

Bouheraoua N, Jouve L, Borderie V, Laroche L. Three Differ-ent Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Kerato-conus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis. J Vis Exp 2015;105.

Kurt T, Ozgurhan EB, Yildirim Y, Akcay BI, Cosar MG, Bozkurt E, et al. Accelerated (18 mW/cm(2)) Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: 18-Month Results. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2016;32:186–91.

Ting DSJ, Rana-Rahman R, Chen Y, Bell D, Danjoux JP, Morgan SJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm2) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up. Eye (Lond) 2019;33:812–8.

Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-in-duced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1780–5.

Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156–62.

Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, Hartstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study. Cornea 2009;28:498–502.

Sedaghat M, Naderi M, Zarei-Ghanavati M. Biomechanical pa-rameters of the cornea after collagen crosslinking measured by waveform analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:1728–31.

Goldich Y, Marcovich AL, Barkana Y, Mandel Y, Hirsh A, Morad Y, et al. Clinical and corneal biomechanical changes after colla-gen cross-linking with riboflavin and UV irradiation in patients with progressive keratoconus: results after 2 years of follow-up. Cornea 2012;31:609–14.

Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cornea 2012;31:21–5.

Sedaghat M, Bagheri M, Ghavami S, Bamdad S. Changes in corneal topography and biomechanical properties after colla-gen cross linking for keratoconus: 1-year results. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2015;22:212–9.

Beckman Rehnman J, Behndig A, Hallberg P, Lindén C. Increased corneal hysteresis after corneal collagen crosslinking: a study based on applanation resonance technology. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:1426–32.

Küçümen RB, Şahan B, Yıldırım CA, Çiftçi F. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Collagen Crosslinking in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus by Ocular Response Analyzer. Turk J Ophthalmol 2018;48:160–5. Uzel MM, Koc M, Can C, Polat S, Yılmazbaş P, Ileri D. Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on ocular response analyzer waveform-derived parameters in progressive keratoconus. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2019;82:18–24.

Sorkin N, Varssano D. Corneal collagen crosslinking: a system-atic review. Ophthalmologica 2014;232:10–27.

Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Identifi-cation of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:553–62.

Çağıl N, Saraç Ö, Akçay E, Aksoy B, Uğurlu N, Ayan M. Kera-tokonus hastalarında korneal kollajen çapraz bağlama tedavisinin kısa dönemde kornea biyomekaniği üzerine etkileri. MN Oftal-moloji 2014;21:152–6.

Elbaz U, Shen C, Lichtinger A, Zauberman NA, Goldich Y, Chan CC, et al. Accelerated (9-mW/cm2) corneal collagen crosslink-ing for keratoconus-A 1-year follow-up. Cornea 2014;33:769– 73.

Mita M, Waring GO 4th, Tomita M. High-irradiance acceler-ated collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1032–40.

Chow VW, Chan TC, Yu M, Wong VW, Jhanji V. One-year out-comes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Sci Rep 2015;5:14425.

Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Miraftab M, Bahrmandy H, Seyedian MA, Amanzadeh K, et al. Short-term comparison of acceler-ated and standard methods of corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:533–40.

Tomita M, Mita M, Huseynova T. Accelerated versus conven-tional corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:1013–20.

Viswanathan D, Kumar NL, Males JJ, Graham SL. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes. Cornea 2015;34:791–6.

Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progres-sive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:41–6.

Kaynak Göster

286 136

Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Alterations in Corneal Biomechanical and Topographic Features After Accelerated Crosslinking: 1-Year Results

Ahmet KIRGIZ, Sevil KARAMAN ERDUR, Kübra Şerefoğlu ÇABUK, Kürşat ATALAY, Şenay AŞIK NACAROĞLU

Intraobserver Repeatability of Corneal and Anterior Segment Parameters Obtained Using a Scheimpflug Camera-Placido Corneal Topography System

Elif ERTAN, MUSTAFA DOĞAN

Evaluation of Retinol Palmitate Treatment of Photokeratitis in Rat Eyes Exposed to Ultraviolet B Radiation

Mehmet Caner FİLİZAY, NESRİN BÜYÜKTORTOP GÖKÇINAR, VAROL ŞAHİNTÜRK, KEVSER SETENAY ÖNER, SEDAT KAÇAR, ZAFER ONARAN, MEHMET ERHAN YUMUŞAK

Anterior Segment Optic Coherence Tomography Changes Before and After Phacoemulsification in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Sibel ZIRTILOĞLU, Özen AYRANCI OSMANBASOĞLU, Tülay ALPAR AKÇETİN, Yeliz ACAR, Mustafa Suat ALIKMA, Erkan ÜNSAL, Kadir ELTUTAR

Ciliary Sulcus Implantation of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Patients with Corneal Decompensation Risk

Serhat İMAMOĞLU, Nimet Yeşim ERÇALIK, Buse GÜNERİ BEŞER, Nimet Burcu ÇELİK

The Effects of Silicone Oil Endotamponade on Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Selim BÖLÜKBAŞI, Burak ERDEN, Akın ÇAKIR

Evaluation of Factors Affecting Epiretinal Membrane Surgery Outcomes

Burak ERDEN, Ziya KAPRAN

Acute Bilateral External Ophthalmoplegia in Miller Fisher Syndrome

Feyza ÇALIŞ KARANFİL, Huban ATİLLA

Macular Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Ocular Hypertension as Assessed Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography

Pınar TOPÇU YILMAZ, Özlem GÜRBÜZ KÖZ, AHMET ALPER YARANGÜMELİ, MEHMET NUMAN ALP

An Analysis of Scheimpflug Holladay-Equivalent Keratometry Readings Following Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking

AYHAN SAĞLIK, HAKİM ÇELİK, MUSTAFA AKSOY