Analysis of the secondary housing settlements based on user assessments

Türkiye'de 1980'li yıllarda baartan hızla devam etmektedir. Bu yerleşmeler her ne kadar altyapı olanaklarından yoksun, inşa kaliteleri düşük, yapısal yerleşme ve yakın çevre özellikleri olumsuz olsa da kullanıcılar tarafından talep görmektedirler. Bu noktadan hareketle olumsuz niteliklerine rağmen ikincil konutların talep görme nedenlerinin araştırılmasına ihtiyaç duyulmuştur. Bu amaçla; ikincil konut alanlarındaki kullanıcıların yerleşmeye ilişkin de ğerlendirmelerinin tespit edilmesine yönelik bir alan çalışması kurgulanmıştır. Çalışma; halen ikincil konut alanı olarak yüksek talep gören Mersin-Silifke sahilinde Atakent Beldesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. 350 deneğin katıldığı çalışmada denekler tabakalı örneklem teknikonut ve yerleolmayı etkileyen faktörler belirlenmiş ve kullanıcıların ikincil konut alanlarına ilişkin beklenti ve tercihleri değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada ulaşılan sonuçların daha nitelikli ikincil konut alanlarının ve yerlebulunacağı düşünülmektedir.

İkincil konut yerleşmelerinin kullanıcı değerlendirmesine dayalı analizi

Construction of secondary housing settlements in Turkey began at the beginning of the 1980s, and it remains to increase rapidly. These settlements are being demanded by users despite inadequate infrastructure facilities, negative characteristics of the settlements and low construction qualities of the houses. From this viewpoint, the buoyant demand for the settlements, although it's negative characteristics, was determined as a subject that needs questioning. For this purpose, a case study was structured to obtain the user's assessments concerning with the characteristics of the secondary housing settlements. It has been conducted in Atakent town located on the Mersin-Silifke coastline in the East Mediterranean region of Turkey. The case study was realized with 350 subjects who are in the area for touristic activities, and the subjects were chosen by stratified sampling technique.In the context of the case study; users' assessments about settlements and houses had obtained, factors that affect owning a secondary house had determined, and users' expectations and preferences about secondary housing settlements had conceived. The results of the study will be able to contribute to the process of realizing the qualified secondary housing settlements and near surroundings through the obtained knowledge about user expectations and preferences.

PDF

___

Tuan, Y. F., Space and place: The perspective of experience, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, (1977).
Stedman, R. C., understanding place attachment among second home owners, American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 187-205, (2006).
Clout, H. D., Social aspects of second-home occupation in the Auvergne, Planning Outlook, 9, 1-2, 33-49, (1970).
Hall, C. M. and Muller, D. K., Second homes, curse or blessing? revisited, in Hall, C. M. and Muller, D. K., Aspects of Tourism, 15: Tourism, Mobility, and Second Homes: Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, 3-14, Channel View Publications, Bristol, (2004).
Goodall, B., Dictionary of human geography, Penguin Books, Harmondworth, (1987).
Coppock, J., Second Homes: Curse or blessing?, Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1977). Visser, G., Second homes and local development: Issues arising from Cape
Town's De Waterkant, GeoJournal, 60, 259-271, (2004).
Burak, S., Doğan, E. and Gazioğlu, C., Impact of urbanization and tourism on coastal environment, Ocean and Coastal Management, 47, 9-10, 515-527, (2004).
Gürçınar, Y. ve Yüceer, S., Mersin-Silifke kıyı çevreye etkileri, Ekoloji Dergisi, 9, 36, 18-24, (2000).
Ongan, S. E., Ulusal çevre eylem planı, arazi kullanımı ve kıyı alanlarının yönetimi, İller Bankası Yayını, Ankara, (1997).
Bulmer, M., Gibbs, J. and Hyman, L., Social measurement through social surveys: an applied approach. Ashgate Publishing Group, Farnham Surrey, (2010).
Erman, O. K., The analysis of symbolic performance in mass housing settlements. Building and Environment, 39, 449-457, (2004).