The changing customs of architectural design: The effects of building information modeling in a local context

The tools used in architectural design processes have always been effective in design activities. BIM methods, which are used as new technological tools and design modes by an increasing number of architectural firms today, have the potential to make a similar impact because they introduce a new logic Therefore, it is a critical issue to examine the change created by BIM in the design processes. In this context, this study examines the potential transformations that BIM can create in architectural design processes with a theoretical approach; It also explores the practical validity of theoretical assumptions. In line with these objectives, a three-pronged methodology was adopted in the study. First, the transformation created by BIM was conceptualized as a holistic digitalization in the field of architecture. Secondly, previous studies on BIM were examined, according to this, the possible effects of BIM on architectural design processes were gathered under three headings and the possible direction of the effects in these three areas was explained theoretically. Finally, the theoretical assumptions were reassessed through interviews with people actively working in the practical field. The inferences obtained at the end of these three stages are evaluated in the discussion section. In consequence, the paper attempts to reveal the transforming mechanism of architectural design practice under the influence of BIM as a new form of knowledge that enables the storage and management of design data. In this context, it aims to be a source for future studies on the orientations of architectural design practice and education.

PDF

___

Andia, A. (2012). Topological future: generative BIM thinking. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) Annual Meeting 2012, 728–734. ACSA Boston.
Atkins, J. B., & Mendelson, A. D. (2016). BIM Me Up, Scotty: Navigating Risk in Digital Practice. Https:// Www.Theaiatrust.Com. Retrieved from https://www.theaiatrust.com/whitepaper- bim-me-up-scotty-navigatingrisk- in-digital-practice/
Azhar, S., Khalfan, M., & Maqsood, T. (2012). Building information modeling (BIM): Now and beyond. Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 12, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb. v12i4.3032
Bernal, M., Haymaker, J. R., & Eastman, C. (2015). On the role of computational support for designers in action. Design Studies, 41, 163–182. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.de-stud.2015.08.001
BIMGenius. (2020). BIMGenius Turkey BIM Report. Retrieved from https://www.bimgenius.org/uploads/ 6/3/9/9/63997129/bImgenius_ p0002_turkiye_bIm_raporu_2019_ rev_0.pdf
Bozdoğan, S., & Nalbantoğlu, G. (2002). Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle: University of Washington Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/ S0896634600003733
Briscoe, D. (2015). Beyond BIM: architecture information modeling. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9781315768991
Cardoso Llach, D. (2012). Builders of the Vision: Technology and the Imagination of Design (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Retrieved from http:// hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77775
Carpo, M. (2001). Architecture in The Age of Printing: Orality, Writing, Typography, and Printed Images in The History of Architectural Theory. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Carpo, M. (2011). The Alphabet and the Algorithm. MIT Press.
Carpo, M. (2013). The Art of Drawing. Architectural Design, 83(5), 128– 133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1646
Carpo, M. (2014). Foreword. In R. Garber (Ed.), BIM Design: Realising the Creative Potential of Building Information Modelling. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118914694
Clayton, M. J. (2015). Modeling architectural meaning. In Building Information Modeling: BIM in Current and Future Practice (pp. 29–41). https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119174752.ch3
Eastman, C. M. (1976). General purpose building description systems. Computer-Aided Design, 8(1), 17–26.
Eastman, C. M. (1999). Building product models: computer environments, supporting design and construction. CRC press. Eastman, C. M., & Henrion, M.
(1977). Glide: a language for design information systems. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 11(2), 24–33.
Eastman, C. M., Lividini, J., & Stoker, D. (1975). A database for designing large physical systems. Proceedings of the May 19-22, 1975, National Computer Conference and Exposition, 603–611.
Eastman, C. M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenman, P. (1976). Post-functionalism. Oppositions, 6 (Fall).
Evans, R. (2000). The projective cast: architecture and its three geometries. MIT press.
Gandelsonas, M. (1976). Neo-Functionalism. Oppositions, 5 (Summer).
Garber, R. (2014). BIM design: realising the creative potential of building information modelling. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118914694
Idi, D. B., & Khaidzir, K. A. M. (2018). Critical perspective of design collaboration: A review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(4), 544–560. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.10.002
Johnston, G. B. (2008). Drafting culture: A social history of “Architectural Graphic Standards.” MIT Press.
Kafescioğlu, R. (2019). Yüksek Mühendis Mektebi’nden İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi’ne, Bir Dönüşümün Öyküsü ve Anılar. YEM Yayınları.
Kalay, Y. E. (2006). The impact ofinformation technology on design methods, products and practices. Design Studies, 27(3), 357–380. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud. 2005.11.001
Kang, T. (2020). Rule-based LEED evaluation method considering BIM linkage and variability. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 24, 110–121.
Luce, K. M. (2009). Revolutions in Parallel: The Rise and Fall of Drawing in Architectural Design. The University of Michigan.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. In Poetics Today (Vol. 5). Manchester University Press.
Ma, L., & Sacks, R. (2016). A cloudbased BIM platform for information collaboration. ISARC 2016-33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 33, 581– 589. IAARC (The International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction)
Na, S., Hong, S.W., Jung, S., & Lee, J. (2020). Performance evaluation of building designs with BIM-based spatial patterns. Autom. Constr. 118, 103290.
Ottchen, C. (2009). The future of information modelling and the end of theory: Less is limited, more is different. Architectural Design, 79(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.845
Oxman, R. (2006). Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, 27(3), 229–265. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.de-stud.2005.11.002
Oxman, R. (2008). Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium. Design Studies, 29(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud. 2007.12.003
Pelletier, L., & Pérez-Gómez, A. (2000). Architectural representation and the perspective hinge. MIT Press.
Pérez-Gómez, A. (2005). The revelation of order: perspective and architectural representation. In This Is Not Architecture (pp. 25–47). https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203994122
Scheer, D. R. (2014). The Death of Drawing: Architecture in the Age of Simulation. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315813950
Tan, F., & Paker-Kahvecioğlu N. (2019). Mimarlıkta simülatif notasyon: Yapı Enformasyon Modelleme = Simulative notation in architecture: Building Information Modeling.
Tschumi, B. (1994). The Manhattan Transcripts. Wiley.
Woods, M. N. (1999). From craft to profession: The practice of architecture in nineteenth-century America. University of California Press.