Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatının Lojistik üzerindeki Etkilerini CIMO-Logic ile Analizi

Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı (AYM), Avrupa'yı 2050 yılına kadar karbon-nötr haline gelen ilk kıta haline getirmeyi amaçlayan bir dizi mevzuat ve politika kılavuzudur. AYM’ye göre, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefine ulaşmak için çeşitli alanlarda değişiklik ve dönüşümler öngörülmektedir. Lojistik sektörünün de odak noktası, bu mutabakata uygun olarak eko-lojistik olarak da bilinen yeşil lojistiğe kaymıştır. Söz konusu kavram, depolama, nakliye ve diğer lojistik faaliyetlerin çevresel etkisini en aza indirmek için lojistik endüstrisi tarafından uygulanan sürdürülebilir yaklaşımları tanımlamaktadır. AYM'nin lojistik üzerindeki etkileri incelenmeli ve daha iyi sonuçlar verebilecek uygulamalar geliştirilmelidir. Bu çalışmada, süreçlerin incelenmesini ve bilimsel kanıt sunulmasını sağlayan tasarım bilimi araştırma yaklaşımlarından biri olan CIMO-Logic'ten yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularının, mutabakatın lojistik uygulamaları üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaya yardımcı olması amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı (AYM), Lojistik, Eko-lojistik, CIMO-Logic

Analysing the Impacts of European Green Deal on Logistics through CIMO-Logic

The European Green Deal (EGD) is a set of legislation and policy guidelines aimed at making Europe the first continent to become carbon neutral by 2050. According to this agreement, changes and transformations are foreseen in various fields in order to achieve the sustainable development goal. The focus of the logistics industry has shifted to green logistics, also known as eco-logistics, in compliance with this deal. This concept describes the sustainable approaches implemented by the wider logistics industry on the continent to minimize the environmental impact of warehousing and transporting goods as well as other logistical activities. The effects of EGD on logistics should be examined and practices that can give better results should be developed. In this study, CIMO-Logic, which is one of the design science research approaches that enable the evaluation of processes and the presentation of scientific evidence, is promoted. The findings of the study are intended to help reveal the effects of this deal on logistics practices.

Keywords:

European Green Deal (EGD), Logistics, Eco-logistics, CIMO-Logic,

PDF

___

Bălan, C. (2018). The disruptive impact of future advanced ICTs on maritime transport: a systematic review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0133
Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
Borowy, I. (2013). Defining sustainable development for our common future: A history of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383797
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson Uk.
Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & Sousa, J. P. D. (2018, September). Exploring the CIMO-logic in the design of collaborative networks mediated by digital platforms. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 266-277). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99127-6_23
Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & de Sousa, J. P. (2020). Industrial business associations improving the internationalisation of SMEs with digital platforms: A design science research approach. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102070
de Sousa Junior, W. T., Montevechi, J. A. B., de Carvalho Miranda, R., & Campos, A. T. (2019). Discrete simulation-based optimization methods for industrial engineering problems: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.073
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization studies, 29(3), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020
Eckert, E., & Kovalevska, O. (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: analyzing the discourse of the European green deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020080
Eskelinen, T., Rajahonka, M., Villman, K., & Santti, U. (2017). Improving internal communication management in SMEs: Two case studies in service design. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(6), 16-24.
European Commission. (2013). Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t_en
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
Hafner, M., & Raimondi, P. P. (2020). Priorities and challenges of the EU energy transition: From the European Green Package to the new Green Deal. Russian Journal of Economics, 6, 374. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.6.55375
Hainsch, K., Brauers, H., Burandt, T., Goeke, L., von Hirschhausen, C. R., Kemfert, C., ... & Wealer, B. (2020). Make the European Green Deal real: Combining climate neutrality and economic recovery (No. 153). DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt.
Halminen, O., Chen, A., Tenhunen, H., & Lillrank, P. (2021). Demonstrating the value of digital health: Guidance on contextual evidence gathering for companies in different stages of maturity. Health Services Management Research, 34(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484820971447
Jäger-Waldau, A., Kougias, I., Taylor, N., & Thiel, C. (2020). How photovoltaics can contribute to GHG emission reductions of 55% in the EU by 2030. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109836
Kajanus, M., Leban, V., Glavonjić, P., Krč, J., Nedeljković, J., Nonić, D., ... & Eskelinen, T. (2019). What can we learn from business models in the European forest sector: Exploring the key elements of new business model designs. Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.005
Kochan, C. G., & Nowicki, D. R. (2018). Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(8), 842-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099
La Notte, A., Tonin, S., & Lucaroni, G. (2018). Assessing direct and indirect emissions of greenhouse gases in road transportation, taking into account the role of uncertainty in the emissions inventory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 69, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.008
Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., & Bobbitt, L. M. (2004). Toward a unified theory of logistics. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, (34)8, 606-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410557758
Nurmala, N., de Leeuw, S., & Dullaert, W. (2017). Humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2016-0262
Öberg, M., Nilsson, K. L., & Johansson, C. M. (2018). Complementary governance for sustainable development in transport: The European TEN-T Core network corridors. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.08.006
Panagakos, G. (2016). Green corridors and network design. In Green transportation logistics (pp. 123-160). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17175-3_4
Pucher, J., Korattyswaropam, N., Mittal, N., & Ittyerah, N. (2005). Urban transport crisis in India. Transport Policy, 12(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.02.008
Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development, 47(3), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 11(4), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.
Sneddon, C., Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard, R. B. (2006). Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world. Ecological economics, 57(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013
Stoilova, S., Munier, N., Kendra, M., & Skrúcaný, T. (2020). Multi-criteria evaluation of railway network performance in countries of the TEN-T orient–east med corridor. Sustainability, 12(4), 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041482
Thiell, M., Zuluaga, J. P. S., Montañez, J. P. M., & van Hoof, B. (2011). Green logistics: Global practices and their implementation in emerging markets. In Green finance and sustainability: Environmentally-aware business models and technologies (pp. 334-357). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-531-5.ch018
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2019). Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2021). Routes to Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation Future. https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/routes-lower-greenhouse-gas-emissions-transportation-future
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird’s eye view. Sustainability, 3(10), 1637-1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637
Walton, S. V., Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. International journal of purchasing and materials management, 34(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00042.x
Wolf, S., Teitge, J., Mielke, J., Schütze, F., & Jaeger, C. (2021). The European Green Deal—more than climate neutrality. Intereconomics, 56(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-0963-z
Yu, W., Jacobs, M. A., Salisbury, W. D., & Enns, H. (2013). The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.023