Symptoms and Awareness of Latex Allergy Among Healthcare Workers

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge levels, sensitivity status, familial latex sensitivity, and attitudes towards the prevention and treatment of latex allergies of healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out cross-sectionally between December 2012 and March 2013. A total of 566 HCWs at a tertiary hospital were included in the study. Results: The data of a total of 566 [333 (58.8%) female and 233 (41.2%) male] HCWs were analyzed. They consisted of 179 (31.6%) physicians, 48 (8.5%) technicians, 238 (42%) nurses, 48 (8.5%) laboratory technicians and 53 (9.4%) patient care workers. The family history of atopy was significantly higher in female HCWs (24.3%) compared to males (17.2%) (p= 0.041). A significant difference was identified between the occupational groups in terms of the rate of allergic symptoms after coming into contact with medical latex products (nurses 59.7%, doctors 17.6%, technicians 5.7%, laboratory technicians 6.9 %, patient care workers 10.1%; p= 0.001). Latexrelated symptoms were significantly more common in atopic HCWs (52.3%) compared to non-atopic ones (19.4%) (p= 0.001). The rate of latex-food syndrome was significantly more frequent in female HCWs (16%) compared to males (8.9%) (p= 0.038). Symptoms that developed after contact with medical and non-medical latex products were significantly more common in female HCWs (79.9% and 80.5%) compared to the male HCWs (21.1% and 19.5%) (p= 0.001). The rate of non-HCW(s) who shared the same house/room with the HCWs after work and who had allergic symptoms while in the same environment with the HCWs was 18%. The rate of these individuals was reported to be highest among the nurses at 53% and there was a statistically significant difference in terms of occupational groups (physicians 25.5%, technicians 9.8%, laboratory technicians 2.9%, patient care workers 7.8%; p= 0.030). Multivariate regression analysis showed that personal history of atopy (OR= 28.657, 95% CI= 6.548-125.411, p= 0.001) and the type of gloves used (latex gloves) (OR= 8.730, 95% CI= 3.490-21.834, p= 0.001) were independent predictors for latex allergy. Conclusion: In conclusion, latex is not only a cause of occupational allergy but is also an allergen that has the potential to cause allergic symptoms in people who share the same environment with HCWs. Questionnaires questioning the symptoms associated with past latex allergy may be an important tool for demonstrating latex sensitization in HCWs and managing latex-related reactions.


1. Jacob JL, d’Auzac J, Prevot JC. The composition of natural latex from Hevea brasiliensis. Clin Rev Allergy 1993;11(3):325-37.

2. Liss GM, Sussman GL. Latex sensitization: Occupational versus general population prevalence rates. Am J Ind Med 1999;35(2):196-200.

3. Sicherer SH. Clinical implications of cross-reactive food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108(6):881-90.

4. Lagier F, Vervloet D, Lhermet I, Poyen D, Charpin D. Prevalence of latex allergy in operating room nurses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;90(3 Pt 1):319-22.

5. Wagner S, Breiteneder H. The latex-fruit syndrome. Biochem Soc Trans 2002;30(Pt 6):935-40.

6. Kartal Ö, Sarı O, Güleç M, Aydoğan U, Musabak U, Sener O. Latex allergy symptoms and awareness of health care students. Gulhane Medical Journal 2015;57(4):352-6.

7. Dieguez MC, Pulido Z, de la Hoz B, Blanco R, Cerecedo I, Fernandez-Caldas E, et al. Latex allergy in healthcare workers: An epidemiological study in a Spanish hospital. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007;28(5):564-70.

8. Kose S, Mandiracioglu A, Tatar B, Gul S, Erdem M. Prevalence of latex allergy among healthcare workers in Izmir (Turkey). Cent Eur J Public Health 2014;22(4):262-5.

9. Buss ZS, Frode TS. Latex allergen sensitization and risk factors due to glove use by health care workers at public health units in Florianopolis, Brazil. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2007;17(1):27-33.

10. Filon FL, Radman G. Latex allergy: A follow up study of 1040 healthcare workers. Occup Environ Med 2006;63(2):121-5.

11. Watts DN, Jacobs RR, Forrester B, Bartolucci A. An evaluation of the prevalence of latex sensitivity among atopic and nonatopic intensive care workers. Am J Ind Med 1998;34(4):359-63.

12. Palczynski C, Walusiak J, Hanke W, Gorski P. Latex allergy in Polish nurses. Am J Ind Med 1999;35(4):413-9.

13. Wu M, McIntosh J, Liu J. Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem? J Occup Health. 2016;58(2):138-44.

14. Holter G, Irgens A, Nyfors A, Aasen TB, Florvaag E, Overa KB, et al. Self-reported skin and respiratory symptoms related to latex exposure among 5,087 hospital employees in Norway. Dermatology. 2002;205(1):28-31.

15. Garcia Ortiz JC, Moyano JC, Alvarez M, Bellido J. Latex allergy in fruit-allergic patients. Allergy. 1998;53(5):532-6.

16. Buss ZS, Kupek E, Frode TS. Screening for latex sensitization by questionnaire: Diagnostic performance in health care workers. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008;18(1):12-6.

17. Blanco C, Sanchez-Garcia F, Torres-Galvan MJ, Dumpierrez AG, Almeida L, Figueroa J, et al. Genetic basis of the latex-fruit syndrome: Association with HLA class II alleles in a Spanish population. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114(5):1070-6.

18. Amarasekera M, Rathnamalala N, Samaraweera S, Jinadasa M. Prevalence of latex allergy among healthcare workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2010;23(4):391-6.

19. Williams PB, Buhr MP, Weber RW, Volz MA, Koepke JW, Selner JC. Latex allergen in respirable particulate air pollution. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;95(1 Pt 1):88-95.

20. Al-Niaimi F, Chiang YZ, Chiang YN, Williams J. Latex allergy: Assessment of knowledge, appropriate use of gloves and prevention practice among hospital healthcare workers. Clin Exp DermatoL 2013;38(1):77-80.

21. Haktanir Abul M, Dereci S, Hacisalihoglu S, Orhan F. Is kiwifruit allergy a matter in kiwifruit-cultivating regions? A populationbased study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2017;28(1):38-43.

22. Erkekol FO, Celik GE, Hayran M, Dursun BA, Goksel OK, Misirligil MS, et al. The prevalence of latex allergy in sixth-year medical students: Assessment of knowledge, risk, and attitudes about future specialty direction. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(6):576-82.

23. Douglas R, Morton J, Czarny D, O’Hehir RE. Prevalence of IgEmediated allergy to latex in hospital nursing staff. Aust N Z J Med 1997;27(2):165-9.

Kaynak Göster