Sefa Giray BATIBAY, İsmail TÜRKMEN, Yavuz SAĞLAM, Ali Erkan YENİGÜL

What is the reason for out-toeing gait on the injured side after surgical treatment of distal tibia physeal fractures?

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the cause of out-toeing gait pattern in children who underwent anatomic reduction and internal fixation for distal tibial physeal injury. Material and Methods: This IRB-approved, Level IV review study included traumatic distal tibia epiphyseal injury treated surgically at a single institution between 2010 and 2015. Patients were called back to return for additional follow-up. All clinical (foot progression angle-FPA, hip rotations, thigh foot angle-TFA) and radiological (distal tibial measurements) evaluations were done by 2 independent observers to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: There were 38 patients with an average age of 11.4±3.8. There was a non-significant trend noted towards externally in FPA on the injured side. TFA was similar in both extremities (p: 0.56). Hip external rotation was significantly high in injured side, whereas hip internal rotation was similar. Hip external rotation was significantly high.Conclusion: Anatomic joint reduction is mandatory to prevent growth arrest and to maintain lower extremity alignment. Considering that there is no pathology of the hip and no radiologic signs of mal-alignment of the ankle, we think that hip external rotators may shortened due to post-operative resting position, which was ended up with out-toeing gait pattern on the injured side.

PDF

___

1. Mann, DC and Rajmaira S. Distribution of physeal and nonphyseal fractures in 2,650 long-bone fractures in children aged 0-16 years. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10: 713-6.
2. Mizuta T, Benson WM, Foster BK, et al.Statistical analysis of the incidence of physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7:518-23.
3. Peterson HA, Madhok R, Benson JT, et al.Physeal fractures: Part 1. Epidemiology in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979-1988. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14: 423-30.
4. Nenopoulos SP, Papavasiliou VA, Papavasiliou AV. Outcome of physeal and epiphyseal injuries of the distal tibia with intra-articular involvement. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:518-22.
5. Peterson CA and Peterson HA. Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. J Trauma 1972;12:275-81.
6. Leary JT, Mandling M, Talerico M, et al. Physeal fractures of the distal tibia: predictive factors of premature physeal closure and growth arrest. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:356-61.
7. Rohmiller MT, Gaynor TP, Pawelek J, et al. Salter-Harris I and II fractures of the distal tibia: does mechanism of injury relate to premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:322-8.
8. Salter RB. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1963;45:587-622.
9. Seel EH, Noble S, Clarke NM, et al. Outcome of distal tibial physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop B 2011;20: 242-8.
10. Petratos DV, Kokkinakis M, Ballas EG, et al. Prognostic factors for premature growth plate arrest as a complication of the surgical treatment of fractures of the medial malleolus in children. Bone Joint J 2013; 95:419-23.
11. Denning JR. Complications of Pediatric Foot and Ankle Fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2017;48:59-70.
12. Spiegel PG, Cooperman DR, Laros GS. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. A retrospective study of two hundred and thirty-seven cases in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60: 1046-50.
13. Cottalorda J, Béranger V, Louahem D, et al. Salter- Harris Type III and IV medial malleolar fractures: growth arrest: is it a fate? A retrospective study of 48 cases with open reduction. J Pediatr Orthop 2008; 28:652-5.
14. Olgun ZD, Maestre S. Management of Pediatric Ankle Fractures.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2018;1:475- 84.
15. Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss C, et al. Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67: 39-47.
16. Goutallier D, De Ladoucette A, Bernageaue J. The incidence of femoral and tibial torsion in the development of compertmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:37-46.
17. Moussa M. Rotational malalignment and femoral torsion in osteoarthritic knees with patellofemoral joint involvement. A CT scan study. Clin Orthop 1994; 304:176-83.
18. Petratos DV, Kokkinakis M, Ballas EG, et al. Prognostic factors for premature growth plate arrest as a complication of the surgical treatment of fractures of the medial malleolus in children. Bone Joint J 2013; 95:419-23.
19. Nathan SS, Athanasian E, Boland PJ, et al. Valgus ankle deformity after vascularized fibular reconstruction for oncologic disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1938-45.
20. Seber, S, Hazer B, Kose N, et al. Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle: computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120:255-8.
21. Craig CL and Goldberg MJ.Foot and leg problems. Pediatr Rev 1993;14:395-400.
22. Fabry G, Cheng LX and Molenaers G.Normal and abnormal torsional development in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;302:22-6.
23. Svenningsen S, Terjesen T, Auflem M, et al. Hip rotation and in-toeing gait. A study of normal subjects from four years until adult age. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;251:177-82.
24. Radler C, Kranzl A, Manner HM, et al. Torsional profile versus gait analysis: consistency between the anatomic torsion and the resulting gait pattern in patients with rotational malalignment of the lower extremity. Gait Posture 2010;32:405-10.
25. Staheli LT. and Engel GM. Tibial torsion: a method of assessment and a survey of normal children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972;86:183-6.
26. Stuberg W, Temme J, Kaplan P, et al. Measurement of tibial torsion and thigh-foot angle using goniometry and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;272:208-12.