Handan ANKARALI, Tugce PASİN, Sinan BAKİRCİ, Safinaz ATAOĞLU

The importance of torg ratio in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Aim: Ankylosing spondylitis is a disease of unknown etiology. It is an inflammatory, rheumatic disease basically influencing peripheral articulations and extra-articular structures. It is chronic and it leads to deformities in vertebra. Deformities in vertebras may lead to cervical spinal stenosis in long term that may result in cervical myelopathy which is a serious health disorder. One of the methods to evaluate the diameter of cervical canal is Torg ratio.Materail and Methods: In this study, patients with ankylosing spondylitis for more than 10 years have been examined through lateral cervical radiograms. The patients were both male and female whose ages range from 40-50 to 50-60. Morphometric measurements of cervical vertebras were made digitally and the differences between groups were revealed.Results: Considering the percentages of the narrowest cervical spinal canal diameter (CSCD) from anterior to posterior, it wasseen that females have the highest vertebra levels in C4 and C6 whereas males have the highest vertebra levels in C3 and C7. The difference between males and females was found statistically significant (P=0.021). Minimum Torg ratio vertebra levels for females was in C6 for the age group 40-50 while it was C7 for the age group 50-60. As for the males, both age groups’ Torg ratio vertebra levels was minimum in C7.Conclusions: In this sense, it was concluded that patients with ankylosing spondylitis for more than 10 years should be monitored more carefully for neurological deficits that stem from cervical myelopathy.

PDF

___

Weinstein PR, Karpman RR, Gall EP, Pitt M. Spinal cord injury, spinal fracture, and spinal stenosis in ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg 1982;57(5):609-16.
Tugcu İ, Yılmaz B, Tezel K, Yazıcıoglu K, Mohur H. Latrogenic Cervical Fracture in a Case with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Rehabilitation Practices. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2010;56:(2)88-90.
Torg JS, Pavlov H, Genuario SE, Sennett B, Wisneski RJ, Robie BH, et al. Neurapraxia of the cervical spinal cord with transient quadriplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68(9):1354-70.
Torg JS, Naranja RJ Jr, Pavlov H, Galinat BJ, Warren R, Stine RA. The relationship of developmental narrowing of the cervical spinal canal to reversible and irreversible injury of the cervical spinal cord in football players. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(9):1308-14.
Sherman JL, Nassaux PY, Citrin CM. Measurements of the normal cervical spinal cord on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11(2):369-72.
Olivieri I, Fiandra E, Muscat C, Barozzi L, Tomassini C, Gerli R. Cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39(12):2074-7.
Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K, et al. Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine 1983;8(1):1-5.
Murone I. The importance of the sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal in relation to spondylosis and myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974;56(1):30-6.
Lim JK, Wong HK. Variation of the cervical spinal Torg ratio with gender and ethnicity. Spine J 2004;(4):396-401.
Karabulut Ö, Karabulut Z. The variations of torg ratiowith genderin patients with neck pain. Dicle Medical Journal 2007;34:(4):272-4.
Ko HY, Park JH, Shin YB, Baek SY. Gross quantitative measurements of spinal cord segments in human. Spinal Cord 2004;42(1):35-40.
Hayashi H, Okada K, Hamada M, Tada K, Ueno R. Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:200-9.
Hashimoto I, Tak YK. The true sagittal diameter of the cervicaL spinal canal and its diagnostic significance in cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg 1977;47(6):912-6.
Feldtkeller E, Vosse D, Geusens P, van der Linden S. Prevalence and annual incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2006;26(3):234-9.
Eismont FJ, Clifford S, Goldberg M, Green B. Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury. Spine 1984;9(7):663-6.
Burrows EH. The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin Radiol 1963;14:77-86.
Gupta SK, Roy RC, Srivastava A. Sagittal diameter of the cervical canal in normal Indian adults. Clin Radiol 1982;33(6): 681-5.