Risk factors for leakage after total gastrectomy

Risk factors for leakage after total gastrectomy

Aim: Although many studies report risk factors for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC), there are conflictingresults in the literature. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy.Material and Methods: Patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a single center between September 2015and September 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The relationship between anastomotic leakage and clinical variables, tumorcharacteristics and intraoperative characteristics of 18 parameters were analyzed. The relationship between anastomotic leakageand survival was evaluated.Results: A total of 102 patients were included in the study. Anastomotic leakage rate was 9.81% (10/102). A significantrelationship was not determined between anastomotic leakage and age >60 (p:0.232), diabetes mellitus (p:0.334),ASA score >3 (p:0.587), albumin 300 (p:0.582), and operationduration >300 min (p:0.176). Multivariate regression analysis, showed female sex (p: 0.05), body mass index (BMI) >30(p:0.024) and tumor localization (p:0.005) are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. There was a significantdifference in mean survival between patients with and without anastomotic leakage (13.9 vs 34.9 months, p: 0.006).Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage was associated with female sex, obesity, and tumor location. We also found that anastomoticleakage adversely affects long-term survival. Detecting risk factors after gastrectomy guides us in the management of patients atthe risk for anastomotic leakage.

___

  • 1. de Martel C, Forman D, Plummer M. Gastric cancer: epi¬demiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013;42:219-40.
  • 2. Türkiye’de Kanser İstatistikleri. Available at: https:// hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/ istatistik/Turkiye_Kanser_Istatistikleri_2015.pdf access date 21.11.2019
  • 3. Russell MC, Mansfield PF. Surgical approaches to gastric can¬cer. J Surg Oncol 2013;107:250-8
  • 4. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, et al. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2011;104:734-40.
  • 5. Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, et al. Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery today 2019;49:187-96.
  • 6. Tu R H, Lin J X, Zheng C H, et al. Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 2017; 43:485-92.
  • 7. Gong W, Li J. Combat with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A critical review of the literature. Int Journal Surg 2017;47:18-24.
  • 8. Schietroma M, Cecilia EM, Carlei F et al. Prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with perioperative supplemental oxygen administration: a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1584-90.
  • 9. Kanaji S, Ohyama M, Yasuda T. et al. Can the intraoperative leak test prevent postoperativeleakage of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total gastrectomy?Surg Today 2016;46:815-2.
  • 10. Deguchi Y, Fukagawa T, Morita S, et al. Identification of risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomoticleakage after gastric surgery. World J Surg 2012;36:1617-22.
  • 11. Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:253-62.
  • 12. Kikuchi H, Miyata H, Konno H et al. Development and external validation of preoperative risk models for operative morbidities after total gastrectomy using a Japanese web-based nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:987-97.
  • 13. Kim S. H, Son S. Y, Park Y S, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage: a retrospective cohort study in a single gastric surgical unit. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:167-75.
  • 14. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2692-700.
  • 15. Çetin D A, Gündeş E, Çiyiltepe H,et al. Risk factors and laboratory markers used to predict leakage in esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy. Turkish J Surgery 2019;35:6-12.
  • 16. Takeuchi M, Ishii K, Seki H et al. Excessive visceral fat area as a risk factor for early postoperative complications of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2016;16:54.
  • 17. Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, et al. Effect of individual fat areas on early surgical outcomes after open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:496-500.
  • 18. Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:253-62.
  • 19. Ancona E, Cagol M, Epifani M. et al. Surgical complications do not affect longterm survival after esophagectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus and cardia. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203: 661-9.
  • 20. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:42-50.
  • 21. Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. mpact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. British J Surg 2010;97:1035-42.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Does dutasteride have any cardioprotective effect in elderly men? A prospective randomised controled study

Ercan ÖĞREDEN, Bengi BAŞER, Emel KARAGÖZ, Ural OĞUZ, Ahmet KARAGÖZ, Alptekin TOSUN, Erhan DEMİRELLİ, Murat USTA, Mehmet KARADAYI, Mehmet Hicri KÖSEOĞLU, Orhan YALÇIN

Anterior stafne defect of the mandible

Dilara Nil TOMRUKÇU, Taha Emre KÖSE

Clinicopathological analysis of seven breast hamartomas and review of the literature

Meryem İlkay EREN KARANİS, İlknur KÜÇÜKKOSMANOĞLU, Ayşegül ALTUNKESER, Hande KÖKSAL

A practical method to improve preoxygenation: Using the APL valve

Mahmut ARSLAN, Cengizhan YAVUZ

The investigation of related factors for vancomycin resistant enterococcus colonization of inpatients at internal medicine service

İsmail DAVARCI, Pınar Zehra DAVARCI, Funda Müşerref TÜRKMEN, Derya ÖZTÜRK ENGİN

Health literacy and Helicobacter Pylori in patients who underwent endoscopic examination for dyspepsia

Hakan DEMİR, Mustafa AKAR, Umut Eren ERDOĞDU, Taşkın ERKİNURESİN, Haci Murat ÇAYCI, Ufuk ARSLAN, Ali TARDU

Severity of coronary artery disease is associated with contrast induced nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function

Serhat SIĞIRCI, Ahmet GÜRDAL, Kadriye Orta KILIÇKESMEZ

The effect of amniotic membrane wrapping on colorectal anastomosis in rats undergoing pelvic radiotherapy

Şadiye Mehtat ÜNLÜ, Baha ASLAN, Süleyman Özkan AKSOY, Ali İbrahim SEVİNÇ, Mustafa Cem TERZİ, Hatice ŞİMŞEK KESKİN, Hilmi Feyzi ALANYALI

Effects of bilateral knee arthroplasty on sagittal spinopelvic balance in patients with primer degenerative osteoarthritis

Sefa Giray BATIBAY, Serkan BAYRAM, Turgut AKGÜL, Hüseyin KOCA, Savaş ÇAMUR, Özcan KAYA, Necdet SAĞLAM

Evaluation of mean platelet volume and distribution width in childhood infectious mononucleosis

Münevver Tuğba TEMEL, Mehmet Enes ÇOŞKUN