Predisposing factors for failure of conservative treatment in umbilical pilonidal sinus: A clinical experience

Predisposing factors for failure of conservative treatment in umbilical pilonidal sinus: A clinical experience

Aim: Pilonidal sinus is a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs in the sacrococcygeal region; but also occurs in theumbilical region. Conservative and surgical treatment methods have been used for management of umbilical pilonidalsinus. Aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for failure of conservative treatment.Materials and Methods: Between June 2016 and March 2018, 16 patients diagnosed with umbilical pilonidal sinus in ourclinic were evaluated retrospectively. The demographical and clinical data, interventions, complications and follow-upresults of the patients were recorded.Results:All of 16 patients initially treated conservatively. After conservative treatment, pilonidal sinus excision wasperformed to 7 (43.75%) patients; five (31.25%) of that patients had no regression of symptoms and two (12.5%) of themhad recurrence. Personal history of umbilical pilonidal sinus, dark skin color, deep navel, and poor personal hygiene werefound as predisposing factors for failure of conservative treatment.Conclusion: Although there is no consensus in the treatment of umbilical pilonidal sinus; the first treatment approachshould be conservative. It should be kept in mind response to conservative management could be poor in patients withthe predisposing factors.

___

  • 1. Hodges RM. Pilonidal sinus. Boston Med Surg 1880;103:485- 6.
  • 2. Patey D, Williams ES. Pilonidal sinus of the umbilicus. Lancet 1956;271:281-2.
  • 3. Eryılmaz R, Sahin M, Okan I, et al. Umbilical pilonidal sinüs disease: predisposing factors and treatment. World J Surg 2005;29:1158-60.
  • 4. Tocchi A, Liotta G, Agostini N. The umbilical pilonidal cyst: A case report-comments on its pathogenesis and treatment. G Chir 1994;15:33-6.
  • 5. Dixit SP. Pilonidal sinus of umbilicus. Can J Surg 1976;19:422-6.
  • 6. Kareem T. Outcomes of conservative treatment of 134 cases of umbilical pilonidal sinus. World J Surg 2013;37:313-7.
  • 7. Fazeli MS, Lebaschi AH, Adel MG, et al. Evaluation of the outcomes of complete sinus excision with reconstruction of the umbilicus in patients with umbilical pilonidal sinus. World J Surg 2008;32:2305-8.
  • 8. Gupta S, Sikora S, Singh M, et al. Pilonidal disease of the umbilicus- a report of two cases. Jpn J Surg 1990;20:590-2.
  • 9. Heller DS. Lesions of the umbilicus: what the minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon needs to know about the belly button. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:680-3.
  • 10. Kaplan M, Ozcan O, Kaplan FC, et al. Conservative vs. surgical interventions for umbilical pilonidal sinus:A multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2016;222:878-89
  • 11. Patey DH. A reappraisal of the acquired theory of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus and assesment of its influence on surgical practice. Br J Surg 1969;56:463-6.
  • 12. Bascom J. Long term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:800-7.
  • 13. Karidakis GE. Easy and successfull treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust NZJ Surg 1992;62:385-9.
  • 14. Sarmast MH, Javaherizadeh H, Shahvari MR. Non-surgical treatment of umblical pilonidal sinus in adolescent and adult cases. Pol Przegl Chir 2011;83:652-3.
  • 15. Al-KadiAS. Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus. International Journal of Health Sciences 2014;8:308-10.
  • 16. McClenathan JH. Umbilical pilonidal sinus. Can J Surg 2000;43:225.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Drug-drug interactions in intensive care units and potential clinical consequences of these interactions

Celaleddin SOYALP, Gokhan OTO, Erol KARAASLAN, İlhami BERBER, Muhammet Serdar BUĞDAY, Ersoy ÖKSÜZ, Rezzan TEMELLİ GÖÇEROĞLU

Risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A retrospective analysis of 284 patients

Serra AKAR, Çetin ÇETİN

Evaluation of periostin levels in gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant sulcus fluid in patients with periodontal and peri-implanter disease: A cross-sectional study

Meral UZUNKAYA

Hesperidin related apoptosis on brain glioblastoma

Elif Sinem İPLİK, Tolga ÇATMAKAŞ, Can ENGİN, Bedia ÇAKMAKOĞLU

Lactose intolerance in the differential diagnosis of uneasy infants

Münevver Tuğba TEMEL, Levent TEMEL, Mehmet Enes COŞKUN, Abdullah Tuncay DEMİRYÜREK

Assessment of behavioral feeding difficulties in young children

Fatma İlknur VAROL, Meltem KIVILCIM, Derya Gümüş DOĞAN, Sinem KORTAY CANALOĞLU, Mukadder Ayşe SELİMOĞLU

Comparison of results of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques in adrenal masses larger than 6 cm

Gürhan SAKMAN, Orçun YALAV, Kubilay DALCI, Uğur TOPAL, İsmail Cem ERAY, Ayşe Gizem ÜNAL

USG Guided triple peripheral nerve blocks in an arthrodesis patient who has implanted cardioverter defibrillators

Yunus DOĞRAMACI, Senem URFALI, Onur KOYUNCU, Sedat HAKİMOĞLU

Medico-legal examination of patients with developmental dysplasia of hip treated surgically due to late diagnosis

Mustafa KARAKAPLAN

Diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and mean thrombocyte volume in irritable bowel syndrome-constipation according to Rome IV criteria

Çagrı AKALIN, Ebru ÇANAKCI