Long-term effects of phacoemulsification surgery on intraocular pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Long-term effects of phacoemulsification surgery on intraocular pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

Aim: To compare the long-term effects of phacoemulsification surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open-angle glaucoma(POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) patients.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective-comparative study. The data of the patients who underwent phacoemulsificationsurgery by the same surgeon between 2010 and 2016 and followed up more than 24 months postoperatively were collected. Whilegroup 1 consisted of 24 patients with POAG group 2 consisted of 16 patients with PXG. Preoperative, postoperative 1st day, 1st, 12th,18th, 24th, 36th and 48th months IOP and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were enrolled.Results: The mean follow-up time of group 1 was 44.17 ± 17.8 months and 43.13 ± 19.4 months for group 2 (p= 0.86). There wasno statistically significant difference between the groups in the preoperative, postoperative 1st day, 1st, 12th, 18th, 36th and 48thmonths IOP (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference for the IOP value measured postoperative 24th month betweenthe groups (p= 0.005). There was a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative 1st, 12nd months IOPmeasurements in group 1 (p= 0.02; p= 0.009, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between preoperative andpostoperative 24th months IOP measurements in group 2 (p=0.01).Conclusion: Although phacoemulsification surgery may cause an increase (14-19 %) in IOP early postoperative period in eyes withPOAG and PXG, may provide a modest level decreases (19-18 %) in the long term.

___

  • 1. Iancu R, Corbu C. Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in patients with uncontrolled primary open angle glaucoma. J Med Life 2014;7:11- 6.
  • 2. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, et al. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1779-86.
  • 3. Shrivastava A, Singh K. The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010;21:118-22.
  • 4. Kronberg BP, Rhee DJ. Anterior segment imaging and the intraocular pressure lowering effect of cataract surgery for open and narrow angle glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol 2012;27:149-54.
  • 5. Chen PP, Lin SC, Junk AK, et al. The Effect of Phacoemulsification on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Patients: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1294- 307.
  • 6. Shingleton BJ, Pasternack JJ, Hung JW, et al. Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. J Glaucoma 2006;15:494-8.
  • 7. Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:887-8.
  • 8. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081-90.
  • 9. Prum BE Jr, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern(®) Guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016;123:41-111.
  • 10. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43:293-320.
  • 11. Merkur A, Damji KF, Mintsioulis G, et al. Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:528-32.
  • 12. Ritch R, Schlotzer Schrehardt U. Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:265-315.
  • 13. Kuchle M, Amberg A, Martus P, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:862-6.
  • 14. Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO. Ocular and systemic pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:921-37.
  • 15. Tarkkanen AH, Kivela TT. Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliation glaucoma at diagnosis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015;25:137-9.
  • 16. Elgin U, Sen E, Simsek T, et al. Early Postoperative Effects of Cataract Surgery on Anterior Segment Parameters in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Turk J Ophthalmol 2016;46:95-8.
  • 17. McKellar MJ, Elder MJ. The early complications of cataract surgery: is routine review of patients 1 week after cataract extraction necessary? Ophthalmology 2001;108:930-5.
  • 18. Ahmed II, Kranemann C, Chipman M, et al. Revisiting early postoperative follow-up after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:100-8.
  • 19. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation following cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2019;30:56-62.
  • 20. Slabaugh MA, Bojikian KD, Moore DB, et al. Risk factors for acute postoperative intraocular pressure elevation after phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:538-44.
  • 21. Jimenez RJ, Lazcano GG, Martinez BK, et al. Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10:1374-8.
  • 22. Mierzejewski A, Eliks I, Kaluzny B, et al. Cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. Klin Oczna 2008;110:11-7.
  • 23. Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S, et al. Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:479-83.
  • 24. Damji KF, Konstas AG, Liebmann JM, et al. Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome: a 2 year prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1014-8.
  • 25. Meyer MA, Savitt ML, Kopitas E. The effect of phacoemulsification on aqueous outflow facility. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1221-7.
  • 26. Epstein DL, Hashimoto JM, Grant WM. Serum obstruction of aqueous outflow in enucleated eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:101-5.
  • 27. Perasalo R. Phaco-emulsification of cataract in eyes with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:299- 300.
  • 28. Slabaugh MA, Bojikian KD, Moore DB, et al. The effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in medically controlled open-angle glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:26-31.
  • 29. Altan YR, Canan H, Pelit A, et al. Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in eyes with pseudoexfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:952-4.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of pericardiotomy on left ventricular muscle mass and hemodynamic parameters

Mehmet KIZILAY, Şenol YAVUZ

Conservative management of cicatrix after circumcision: Retraction and steroid

Mirzaman HÜSEYNOV, Ali Ekber HAKALMAZ

Relationship between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and fractional flow reserve in left anterior descending artery with intermediate stenosis

Ramazan ASOĞLU, Abdulmecit AFŞİN, Adem ATICI, Emin ASOĞLU

Management of penile zipper injury: A case report

Alper URAL, Dilan ALTINTAŞ URAL

A rare cause of acute abdominal pain: Torsion of wandering spleen

Uğur TOPAL, Kubilay DALCI

The high rate of Candida parapsilosis candidemia among non-burn patients with polytrauma in the surgical intensive care units of a university hospital

Tayibe BAL, Mehmet ÇABALAK, Burçin ÖZER, Mehmet Selim ÇÖMEZ, Yusuf ÖNLEN

Head table may provide nonslippery additional working space during abdominal surgery

Mehmet Eren YÜKSEL

An investigation of the use of SCUBE1 protein as an early prognostic marker in predicting prognosis after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients

Ahmet MENTEŞE, Ali AYGÜN, Gürkan ALTUNTAŞ, Faruk ÖZŞAHİN, Özgür TATLI, Süleyman TÜREDİ, Selim DEMİR, Ahmet Ali TOP, Şenol ARDIÇ, Betül ABANOZ

The place of total testosterone in the etiology of pilonidal sinus disease

Murat KANLIÖZ, Uğur EKİCİ, Faik TATLI, Turgay KARATAŞ

Dynamic thiol / disulfide homeostasis in metabolically healthy obese adolescents

Özcan EREL, Özge YÜCE