Evaluation of the results of pulse oximetry screening for detection congenital heart disease in Konya region, Turkey; Is it cost effective?

Evaluation of the results of pulse oximetry screening for detection congenital heart disease in Konya region, Turkey; Is it cost effective?

Aim: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common congenital anomalies. It is known that early detection of the criticallesions without symtomatic improves the prognosis of patients in the long term. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy andcost of pulse oximetry screening for detection of CHD in Konya region.Material and Methods: In our study, we analyzed the results of pulse oximetry screening of infants born between 2016 and 2018in Selcuk University and Saglik Bilimleri University Konya Training and Research Hospital. Positive screening test results and theircosts was evaluated.Results: Pulse oximetry was performed on a total of 3440 infants for screening congenital heart disease at two different centers. 2003(58.2%) of the cases were female and 1437 (41.8%) were male. The mean timing of screening was 24.7±13.1 (4-100) hours (mean ±SD (min-max). 292 (8.48%) infants were tested positive. Echocardiographic examination was performed in the positive cases. Theprevalence of CHD was found to be 27.6 ‰. The prevalence of critical CHD was 1.16 per 1000 live births. The false-positive screenrate was found to be 197 (5.7%). Among the cases who were screened, the most common CHD was the secundum ASD. The totalcost of probes was 2622 ₺ ($497.91). The cost of echocardiography for 292 babies was approximately 13181 ₺ ($2503).Conclusion: Screening for heart disease can be used effectively in the early diagnosis of serious and life-threatening diseasesin newborn and the cost is unneglectable in the early screening of patients. This study, the total cost of each infant screening isapproximately 4.5 ₺ ($0.85) which appears to be a quite cheap and effective screening compared to the other countries.

___

  • 1. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:890-1900.
  • 2. Plana MN, Zamora J, Suresh G, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD011912.
  • 3. Riede FT, Wörner C, Dähnert I, et al. Effectiveness of neonatal pulse oximetry screening for detection of critical congenital heart disease in daily clinical routine-results from a prospective multicenter study. Eur Journal Pediatr 2010;169:975-81.
  • 4. Hoffman JIE. It is time for routine neonatal screening by pulse oximetry. Neonatology. 2011;99:1-9.
  • 5. de-WahlGranelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39821 newborns. BMJ 2009;338:a037.
  • 6. Mellander M, Sunnegardh J. Failure to diagnose critical heart malformations in newborns before discharge an increasing problem? Acta Paediatrica 2006;95:407-13.
  • 7. Taksande A, Meshram R, Lohakare A, et al. An update work of pulse oximetry screening for detecting critical congenital heart disease in the newborn. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2017;19:12-8.
  • 8. Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics 2009;124:823-36.
  • 9. Sharland G. Fetal cardiac screening: why bother? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;95:F64-F8.
  • 10. Taksande A, Lakhkar B, Gadekar A, et al. Accuracy of pulse oximetry screening for detecting critical congenital heart disease in the newborns in rural hospital of Central India. Images PaediatrCardiol 2013;15:5-10.
  • 11. Knowles R, Griebsch I, Dezateux C, et al. Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and costeffectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-152.
  • 12. Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defect in newborn infants (PuseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet 2011;378:785-94.
  • 13. Riede FT, Dahnert I, Schneider P. Pulse oximetry screening at 4 hours of age to detect critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2009;123:542-3.
  • 14. Sendelbach DM, Jackson GL, Lai SS, et al. Pulse oximetry screening at 4 hours of age to detect critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics 2008;122:e815-e20.
  • 15. Singh A, Rasiah SV, Ewer AK. The impact of routine predischarge pulse oximetry screening in a regional neonatal unit Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014;99:F297-F302.
  • 16. Reich JD, Connolly B, Bradley G, et al. Reliability of a single pulse oximetry reading as a screening test for congenital heart disease in otherwise asymptomatic newborn infants: the importance of human factors. PediatrCardiol 2008;29:371-6.
  • 17. Bradshaw EA, Cuzzi S, Kiernan SC, et al. Feasibility of implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in a community hospital. J Perinatol 2012;32:710-5.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi