Evaluation of axillary lymph node status after axillary dissection in patients with SLN negative or single SLN positive T1 and T2 breast cancer

Evaluation of axillary lymph node status after axillary dissection in patients with SLN negative or single SLN positive T1 and T2 breast cancer

Aim: The most substantial factor determining prognosis in breast cancer is axillary lymph node involvement. Therefore, axillary lymph node status should be evaluated correctly in the staging of the disease and determining the prognosis. In this study, we aim to evaluate the detection rate of metastatic lymph nodes after axillary dissection in patients with negative or single positive sentinel lymph nodes in early-stage breast cancer.Materials and Methods: We have included patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or axillary dissection diagnosed with early-stage (T1 and T2) breast cancer between 2018 and 2019 in the study. We have evaluated tumor prognostic factors from patient files and the total number of lymph nodes and tumor positive lymph nodes from pathology paraffin specimens.Results: The study included 29 female patients with an average age of 56 (34-83). Breast-conserving surgery (BCS)+SLNB was performed in 15 patients and BCS+ AD in 11 patients and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) was performed in 3 patients. In 3 patients with positive surgical margin after BCS + SLN, although one patient was positive and the other two patients were negative in SLN, multiple metasatic lymph nodes were detected after axillary dissection due to the patients' request for axillary dissection. Patients were followed-up for an average of 26 months without recurrence or metastasis. Conclusion: Considering that there may be lymph node metastasis other than the sentinel lymph node in patients with SLNB negatives or single positive sentinel lymph node, we recommend more than one lymph node excision in addition to the stained lymph node.

___

  • 1. Telli Melinda L, William J, et al. NCCN guidelines updates: breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:552-5.
  • 2. Stein Roland G, Firicker R. Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer Treatment Concepts-a Retrospective Study of 1,214 Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care 2017;12:324-8.
  • 3. Bergkvist L, Frisell J. Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer. British J Surgery 2005;92:1221-4.
  • 4. Chung A, Giuliano AE. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. The Breast Elsevier 2018;1:604-30.e606.
  • 5. Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad. Predictive factors affecting axillary lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer in Duhok: cross-sectional study. Annals of Med and Surgery 1999;44:87-90.
  • 6. Noguchi, Masakuni. Current controversies concerning sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 84:261-71.
  • 7. Giuliano Armando E, Kirgen DM, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:391.
  • 8. Sakorafas George H, Adelais G, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: current status and controversies, alternative strategies and future perspectives. Acta Oncologica 2000;39:455-66.
  • 9. Flett MM, Going JJ, Stanton PD,et al. Sentinel node localization in patients with breast cancer. British J of surgery 1998;85: 991-3.
  • 10. Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, et al. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer–results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;99:203-8.
  • 11. Veronesi U, Galimberti V, Paganelli G, et al. Axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel nodes: a follow-up of 3548 cases. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:1381-8.
  • 12. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinellymph- node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically nodenegative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2010;11:927-33.
  • 13. Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg 2010;251: 595-600.
  • 14. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2006;98:599-609.
  • 15. Kern, Kenneth A. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189: 539-45.
  • 16. Cody III HS, Hill AD, Tran KN, et al. Credentialing for breast lymphatic mapping: how many cases are enough?. Ann Surg 1999;229:723.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation program with cycle ergometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mazlum Serdar AKALTUN, Savaş GÜRSOY, Özlem ALTINDAĞ, Ali GÜR, Meral UYAR

Is percutaneous cholecystostomy bridge to cholecystectomy or definite therapy in high-risk patients with severe acute calculous cholecystitis?

Hüseyin Onur AYDIN, Tevfik AVCI, Gökhan MORAY, Hakan YABANOĞLU, Erdal KARAGÜLLE, Ali HARMAN

Prevalence and severity of pterygium in Somalian male population: Can Khat consumption have a synergistic effect with ultraviolet radiation?

Mustafa KALAYCI, Ersan ÇETİNKAYA

Evaluation of the relationship between physical activity level and functional capacity, depression and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Tülay YILDIRIM

The perception of risk related to complications and its relation with metabolic parameters in diabetic individuals

Feride TAŞKIN YILMAZ, Azime KARAKOÇ KUMSAR, Elif BAĞDEMİR, Selda ÇELİK

Examination of the attitudes of patients in preoperative period toward uncertainty and the factors affecting the period toward uncertainty and the factors affecting the

Altun BAKSI, Hasan GENÇ

The predictors of 3-month mortality in community-acquired pneumonia

Gökhan PERİNÇEK, Sema AVCI

The preventive effect of sulforaphane on liver injury in a non-heart-beating donor model

Zeki YILMAZ, Mehmet BAYKAN

The effectiveness of olmesartan on inflammation at cardiopulmonary bypass

İbrahim Murat ÖZGÜLER, Latif ÜSTÜNEL

A comparison of inflammatory indicators in twins on the first postnatal day

Hasan Tolga ÇELİK, M. Sinan BEKSAC, Melek BÜYÜKEREN, Murat YURDAKÖK, Erdem FADIOĞLU, Umut Ece ARSLAN, Şule YİĞİT, Işıl BİLGİÇ