Burak KÖPRÜ, Turgay EBİLOĞLU, Giray ERGİN, Mustafa KIRAÇ, Yusuf KİBAR, Hasan BİRİ

Comparison of acute kidney injury after zero ischemia robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal mass

Aim: Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) is promising option for RCC treatment with favorable outcomes. Inthis present study we aimed to compare the incidence of (AKI) acute kidney injury measured by AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network)criteria between open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and RALPN procedures with zero ischemiaperiods.Material and Methods: The medical records of 88 patients with renal mass who underwent OPN, LPN and RALPN at our institution[24 female/64 male; median age of 55 (IQR: 46–65) years] were evaluated retrospectively. AKI was defied by AKIN criteria.Results: Twenty-six patients underwent OPN, 32 LPN and 30 patients RALPN. Mean preoperative creatinine was 0.92 ±0.43 mg/dl,mean hemoglobin level was 14.0±1.9 g/dl. Total of 19 patients developed AKI according to the AKIN criteria, all of those had stage1 AKI, 10 (53%) in OPN, 7 (3%) in LPN and 2 (11%) in RALPN group (p=0,004). Multivariate regression analysis adjusted by age andgender showed that operation time per minute [1.02 (CI 95%, 1.00, 1.04) p=0.04], fluid administered as ml/kg/hour [1.003 (CI 95%,1.000, 1.006) p=0.04], red blood cell transfused as unit [1.27 (CI 95%, 1.07, 1.52) p=0.006] and operation type as RALPN surgeryversus OPN and LPN [0.11 (CI 95%, 0.02, 0.58) p=0.01] were signifiantly associated with development ıf AKI.Conclusion: Robot assisted partial nephrectomy is more favorable approach compared to OPN and LPN with lower operation timeand lower hemoglobin loss.

PDF

___

1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1374-403.
2. Shao IH, Kan HC, Liu CY, et al. Role Of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy For Renal Cell Carcinomas In The Purpose Of Nephron Sparing. Onco Targets Ther 2019;12:8189-96.
3. Van Poppel H, Becker F, Cadeddu JA, et al. Treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011;60:662- 72.
4. Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Rogers C, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J Urol 2004;172:871-3.
5. Mullins JK, Feng T, Pierorazio PM, et al. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy techniques in the treatment of localized renal tumors. Urology 2012;80:316-21.
6. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multiinstitutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009;182:866-72.
7. Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;180:2363-8.
8. Choi SY, Jung H, You D, Jeong IG, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is associated with early recovery of renal function: Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using DTPA renal scintigraphy. J Surg Oncol 2019;119:1016-23.
9. Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. Zero ischemia’ partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. European Urology 2011;59:128-34.
10. Varma R, Gupta JK Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifiations. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2686-97.
11. Bex A, Albiges L, Ljungberg B, et al. Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2018;74:805-9.
12. Capitanio U, Montorsi F Renal cancer. Lancet 2016;387:894-906.
13. Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019;75:74-84.
14. Bravi CA, Larcher A, Capitanio U, et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (The RECORd 2 Project). Eur Urol 2019.
15. Greco F, Autorino R, Altieri V, et al. Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2019;75:477-91.
16. Boga MS, Sonmez MG Long-term renal function following zero ischemia partial nephrectomy. Res Rep Urol 2019;11:43-52.
17. Sims CA, Yuxia G, Singh K, et al. Supplemental arginine vasopressin during the resuscitation of severe hemorrhagic shock preserves renal mitochondrial function. PloS one 2017.
18. Luciani LG, Chiodini S, Mattevi D, et al. Roboticassisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: results from a prospective cohort study. J Robot Surg 2017;11:333-9.
19. Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim KH, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up. BJU Int 2018;122:618-26.
20. Burchardi H, Kaczmarczyk G The effect of anaesthesia on renal function. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994;11:163-8.
21. Liu JJ, Leppert JT, Maxwell BG, et al. Trends and perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic nephrectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urol Oncol 2014;32:473-9.
22. Kaczmarek BF, Tanagho YS, Hillyer SP, et al. Offclamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multi-institutional propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 2013;64:988-93.
23. Simone G, Papalia R, Guaglianone S, et al. 'Zero ischaemia', sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours with a low nephrometry score. BJU Int 2012;110:124-30.
24. Rizkala ER, Khalifeh A, Autorino R, et al. Zero ischemia robotic partial nephrectomy: sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique. Urology 2013;82:100-4.