Clinical characteristics of the patients with cavernous angiomas

Clinical characteristics of the patients with cavernous angiomas

Aim: Cerebral cavernous angiomas (CCAs) are a rare type of hamartoma characterized by a small sinusoidal vein without normal parenchyma. This study aimed to assess the radiological findings, clinical symptoms, and localization of CCAs and compare results with those in the literature.Material and Methods: Patients with CCA who underwent surgery between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.Results: Of the 41 patients with CCA, 24 (58.5%) were males and 17 (41.5%) were females. The patients were aged from 6 to 72 (mean: 36.75 ± 16.97) years. Moreover, 13 (31.7%), 6 (14.6%), 14 (34.1%), 4 (9.8%), and 2 (4.9%) patients presented with supratentorial lesions localized in the frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and thalamic regions, respectively. Two (4.9%) patients had cavernomas in the infratentorial area that contains the pons. No pathology was observed on brain computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the control examinations.Conclusion: Surgical excision should be performed in individuals with cavernous angiomas that are symptomatic. Critically localized and asymptomatic cavernous angiomas can be monitored with MRI at regular intervals. Surgical treatment should always be considered since neurological deterioration may occur due to epileptic seizures and recurrent bleeding that do not respond to treatments.

___

  • 1. Zabramski JM, Wascher TM, Spetzler RF, et al. The natural history of familial cavernous malfor-mations: results of an ongoing study. J Neurosurg 1994;80:422-32.
  • 2. Gault J, Sarin H, Awadallah NA. Pathobiology of human cerebrovascular malformations: basic mechanisms and clinical relevance. Neurosurgery 2004;55:1-17.
  • 3. Al-Shahi R, Bhattacharya JJ, Currie DG, et al. Prospective, population-based detection of intra-cranial vascular malformations in adults: the Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS). Stroke 2003;34:1163-9.
  • 4. Feletti A, Dimitriadis S, Pavesi G. Cavernous Angioma of the Cerebral Aqueduct. World Neuro-surg. 2017;98:15-22.
  • 5. Çavuş G, Gezercan Y, Açık V, et al. Cavernous Angiomas. Türk Nöroşir Derg 2016;26:191-7.
  • 6. Villalonga JF, Saenz A, Campero A. Surgi-cal treatment ofan asymptomatic giant supratentorial cavernous hemangioma. Case report. J Clin Neurosci 2019;S0967-5868:32056-3.
  • 7. Kayali H, Sait S, Serdar K, et al. Intracranial cavernomas: analysis of 37 cases and literature re-view. Neurol India 2004;52:439-42.
  • 8. Aiba T, Tanaka R, Koike T, et al. Natural history of intracranial cavernous malformations. J Neuro-surg 1995;83:56-9.
  • 9. Kim DS, Park YG, Choi JU, et al. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous malformations. Surg Neurol 1997;48:9-17
  • 10. Frim DM, Scott RM. Management of cavernous malformations in the pediatric population. Neuro-surg Clin N Am 1999;10:513-8.
  • 11. Porter PJ, Willinsky RA, Harper W, et al. Cerebral cavernous malformations: natural history and prognosis after clinical deterioration with or without hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1997;87:190-7.
  • 12. Smith ER, Scott RM. Cavernous Malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010;21:483-90
  • 13. Cortés Vela JJ, Concepción Aramendía L, Ballenilla Marco F, et al. Cerebral cavernous malfor-mations: spectrum of neuroradiological findings. Radiologia 2012;54:401-9.
  • 14. Anne GO: Brain: Imaging, patology, and anatomy. Osborn AG edition. Osborns Brain: Imaging, Pa-tology, and Anatomy. 1st edition. Amirsys; 2013. p. 159-62
  • 15. Kang K, Ju Y, Wang D, et al. Cerebral venous malformations ina chi-nese population: clinical manifestations, radiological characteristics, and long-term prognosis. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e472-e9.
  • 16. Kesava PP, Turski PA. MR angiography of vascular malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1998;8:349-70.
  • 17. Pesce A, Frati A, D’Andrea G, et al. The real impact ofan intraoperative magnetic resonance imagingquipped operative theatre in neurovascular surgery:the sapienza university experience. World Neurosurg 2018;120:190-99.
  • 18 Labauge P, Laberge S, Brunereau L, et al. Hereditary cerebral cavernous angiomas: clinical and ge-netic features in 57 French families. Societe Francaise de Neurochirurgie. Lancet 1998;352:1892-7.
  • 19. Otten P, Pizzolato GP, Rilliet B, et al. 131 cases of cavernous angioma (cavernomas) of the CNS, discovered by retrospective analysis of 24,535 autopsies. Neurochirurgie 1989;35:82-3
  • 20. Siegel AM, Andermann E, Badhwar A, et al. Anticipation in familial cavernous angioma: a study of 52 families from International Familial Cavernous Angioma Study. IFCAS Group. Lancet 1998;352:1676-7.
  • 21. Fontaine S, Melanson D, Cosgrove R. et al. Cavernous hemangiomas. MR imaging. Radiology 1998;166:839-41.
  • 22. Cantore G, Missori P, Santoro A. Cavernous angiomas of the brain stem. Intra-axial anatomical pit-falls and surgical strategies. Surg Neurol 1999;52:84-93.
  • 23. Konan AV, Raymond J, Bourgouin P, et al. Cerebellar infarct caused by spontaneous thrombosis of a developmental venous anomaly of posterior fossa. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:256-58.
  • 24. Zimmerman RS, Spetzler RF, Lee KS, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brain stem. J Neuro-surg 1991;75: 32-9.
  • 25. Li ZH, Wu Z, Zhang JT, et al. Surgi-cal management and outcomes of cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a single institution-series of 47 patients. World Neurosurg 2019;122:e1181-94
  • 26. Rigamonti D, Drayer BP, Johnson PC, et al. The MRI appearance of cavernous malformations (an-giomas). J Neurosurg 1987;67:518-24.
  • 27. Imakita S, Nishimura T, Yamada N, et al. Cerebral vascular malformations: applications of magnet-ic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis. Neuroradiology 1989;31:320-5.
  • 28. Sage MR, Blumbergs PC. Cavernous haemangiomas (angiomas) of the brain. Australas Radiol 2001;45:247-56.
  • 29. De Oliveira JG, Rassi-Neto A, Ferraz FA, et al. Neurosurgical management of cerebellar cavernous malformations.Neurosurg Focus 2006;21:e-11.
  • 30. Brunereau L, Labauge P, Tournier-Lasserve E, et al. Familial form of intracranial cavernous angio-ma: Mr imaging findings in 51 families. Radiology 2000;214:209-16.
  • 31. Hejazi N, Classen R, Hassler W. Orbital and cerebral cavernomas: Comparison of clinical, neu-roimaging, and neuropathological features. Neurosurg Rev 1999;22:28-33.
  • 32. Nikoubashman O, Di Rocco F, Davagnanam I, et al. Prospec-tive hemorrhage rates of cerebral cavernous malformations in children and adolescents based on mri appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2177-83.
  • 33. Baumgartner JE, Ater JL, Ha CS, et al. Pathologically proven cavernous angiomas of the brain fol-lowing radiation therapy for pediatric brain tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003;39:201-7.
  • 34. Scott RM, Barnes P, Kupsky W, et al. Cavernous angiomas of the central nervous system in chil-dren. J Neurosurg 1992;76:38-46.
  • 35. Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experi-ence with 100 patients. J Neurosurg 1999;90:50-8.
  • 36. Di Rocco C, Iannelli A, Tamburrini G. Cavernous angiomas of the brain stem in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;27:92-9.
  • 37. Amin-Hanjani S, Ogilvy CS, Ojemann RG, et al. Risks of surgical management for cavernous mal-formations of the nervous system. Neurosurgery 1998;42:1220-7.
  • 38. Amin-Hanjani S, Ogilvy CS, Candia GJ, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous malfor-mations: Kjellberg’s experience with proton beam therapy in 98 cases at the Harvard Cyclotron. Neurosurgery 1998;42:1229-36.
  • 39. Maraire JN, Awad IA. Intracranial cavernous malformations: Lesion behavior and management strategies. Neurosurgery 1995;37:591-605.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Clinical efficacy and acceptability of 0.25% flurbiprofen mouthwash after periodontal flap surgery: A double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Burcu OZDEMİR, Cise NAZIM, Sila Cagri IŞLER, Muge AYDOGAN, Hikmat BAKHISHOV, Memnune DINC

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of MRCP and ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis

Bunyamin GURBULAK, Muhammed Zubeyr UCUNCU

Specimen extraction and anvil placement methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A single surgeon’s experience

Servet KARAGÜL

Early-stage outcomes of bursectomy in surgery of gastric cancer and radical gastric resection

Murat CİKOT, Osman KONES, Eyup GEMİCİ, Ahmet SUREK, Sinan BİNBOGA, Halil ALİS

Apelin has inhibitory effect of endothelium-independent relaxation in the human internal mammary artery

İhsan SERHATLIOĞLU, Emine KAÇAR, Ayhan UYSAL, Oktay BURMA, Haluk KELEŞTİMUR, Ahmet YARDIM, Nazife ULKER

The correlation between cytological examination of ascitic fluid and serum ascites albumin gradient in the differential diagnosis of ascites

Mehmet Ali ERDOGAN, Yahya ATAYAN, Mehmet Veysi DEVİREN, Ayetullah APAK, Sendag YASLIKAYA, Ali Rıza ÇALIŞKAN

The characteristics of episodic migraine vs. chronic migraine at high altitude and the relationship with body mass index, education level and MIDAS

Mustafa CEYLAN

Our experience of endovascular treatment in coronary subclavian steal syndrome with a review of the literature

Dogus HEMSİNLİ, Tuncay ERDEN

The independent risk factors that affect the hospitalization of acute bronchiolitis

Mehmet ASLAN, Ridvan SELEN, Erdem TOPAL

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Factors affecting prognosis and single-center surgery results

Nejdet BİLDİK, Aylin ACAR, Metin KEMENT, Kenan ÇETİN, Gokcen Alinak GUNDOGAN, Ersin GÜNDOĞAN