Analysis of digital panoramic imaging findings of completely edentulous patients applying for prosthetic treatment

Aim: The aim of this study is determination of the prevalence and clinical significance of random findings detected in digital panoramic images of complete edentulism patients, applied for prosthetic treatment. Material and Methods: Of the 382 images, 189 digital panoramic images (49.5%) matching the study criteria were included in the study. The positive findings were evaluated, such as impacted teeth, residual roots, radiolucent lesions, radiopaque (RO) lesions,foreign bodies, atrophic crest, soft tissue calcifications (STCs), maxillary sinus opacities, Stafne bone defects, stylohyoid ligament ossifications, and laryngeal cartilage calcifications. The findings were analyzed in different age groups and evaluated with descriptive analysis.Results: Images of 100 male (53%) and 89 female (47%) patients with a mean age of 64.2±9.6 were examined. It was found that 80% (n=151) of the patients were delivered conventional complete dentures, 20% (n=38) of them were delivered complete dentures in the upper jaw, and two implant-retained overdentures in the lower jaw. The detected positive radiographic findings were 94.7% (n=179); 48.7% (n=87) were in female and 51.3% (n=92) were in male. The most common positive findings were maxillary (50.7%) and mandibular (28.4%) crest atrophies, followed by maxillary sinus opacities (25.9%), and STCs in tonsilloliths region (18.5%). In all age groups, the most common positive finding was maxillary crest atrophy.Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the rate of positive findings detected in digital panoramic images of completely edentulous patients was high. Routine use and careful examination of panoramic images are essential for patients with complete edentulism.

PDF

___

1. Ahmad R, Affandi NF, Ayub NM, et al. The value of panoramic radiograph as a screening tool prior to complete denture construction: a restrospective study. J Dent Indones 2019;26:65-9.
2. Jindal SK, Sheikh S, Kulkarni S, et al. Significance of pre-treatment panoramic radiographic assessment of edentulous patients--a survey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:600-6.
3. MacDonald D, Yu W. Incidental findings in a consecutive series of digital panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent 2020;50:53-64.
4. Michaeli Y, Hermel J, Gizenfeld E, et al. Pathologic radiographic findings in clinically symptom-free edentulous subjects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968;26:27-30.
5. Masood F, Robinson W, Beavers KS, et al. Findings from panoramic radiographs of the edentulous population and review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2007;38:298-305.
6. Keur JJ, Campbell JPS, Mccarthy JF, et al. Radiological findings in 1135 edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:183-91.
7. Bohay RN, Stephens RG, Kogon SL. A study of the impact of screening or selective radiography on the treatment and postdelivery outcome for edentulous patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:353-9.
8. Kratz RJ, Walton JN, MacEntee MI, et al. Panoramic radiographs made before complete removable dental prostheses fabrication: A retrospective study of clinical significance. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:26-30.
9. Awad EA, Al-Dharrab A. Panoramic radiographic examination: a survey of 271 edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:55-7.
10. Choi JW. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: Review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent 2011;41:1-6.
11. Kose TE, Demirtas N, Karabas HC, et al. Evaluation of dental panoramic radiographic findings in edentulous jaws: A retrospective study of 743 patients “radiographic features in edentulous jaws.” J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:380-5.
12. Peker I, Toraman Alkurt M, Yıldırım Biçer Z. Evaluation of total and partial edentulous jaws using panoramic radiography. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg 2015;24:241-5.
13. Macdonald D. How should dentists recognise calcified carotid artery atheromas?. Gerodontology 2013;30:169-70.
14. MacDonald D, Chan A, Harris A, et al. Diagnosis and management of calcified carotid artery atheroma: Dental perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:533-47.
15. Sumer AP, Sumer M, Guler AU, et al. Panoramic radiographic examination of edentulous mouths. Quintessence Int 2007;38:399-403.
16. Jones JD, Seals RR, Schelb E. Panoramic radiographic examination of edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:535-9.
17. Ozdede M, Akay G, Karadağ O, et al. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of tonsilloliths. Med Princ Pract 2020;29:279-84.
18. Ozdede M, Kayadugun A, Ucok O, et al. The assessment of maxillofacial soft tissue and intracranial calcifications via cone-beam computed tomography. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2018;14:798-806.
19. Amine K, Slaoui S, Kanice FZ, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions: A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. Published Online: Jan 10, 2020.
20. Demiralp KO, Bayrak S, Kursun Cakmak ES. Assessment of stafne bone defects prevalence and characteristics by using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Kirikkale Univ Tip Fak Derg 2017;19:167-72.