Zafer ŞAHİN, Ömer Faruk KALKAN, Selim KUTLU

An example of a misnomer in medicine: Choice of the term basal ganglia for the basal nuclei

In modern literature, a group of neurons in the peripheral nervous system is called a ‘ganglion’, while this in the central nervoussystem is called a ‘nucleus’. For the plurality of these structures, ganglia and nuclei are used, respectively. Such terminologicaldistinction was probably not in the mind of early scientists, and the name of the basal ganglion became a misnomer frequentlyused by modern scientists to name subcortical nuclei involved in the control of movement. All this is far from explaining why thismisnomer continues. It is not known whether it will change in the future, but it is certain that this will not happen in the near future.Knowing that it is used with a misnomer and the fact that these structures are actually basal nuclei appears in the minds of scientistsand students is an important victory.

PDF

___

1. Rodney AR, David RB. Medical Physiology: Principles for Clinical Medicine. Fourth Edition. Istanbul tıp kitabevleri; 2017:103-4.
2. Koeppen BM, Stanton BA. Berne and Levy Physiology: 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier 2010:291-2.
3. Haines DE. Fundamental Neuroscience. 1st edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.
4. Carpenter MB. Human Neuroanatomy. 7th ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company; 1976.
5. Netter FH. The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations: Nervous System, Volume 1: Part 1: Anatomy and Physiology. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevi; 2007:192.
6. John E. Hall. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology. Thirteenth edition. USA: Elsevier Ltd Philadelphia 2016:730-5.
7. Parent A. The History of the Basal Ganglia: The Nuclei Chapter 2, In: Steiner H, Tseng KY. Handbook of Basal Ganglia Structure and Function. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, Elsevier 2016:33-44.
8. Mondino de’ Liuzzi. Anathomia. Bologna: Bernardinum Venetum 1482.
9. Berengario da Carpi. Isagogae breves per lucidae ac uberrimae in anatomiam humani corporis a comunis medicorum academia usitam. Nenedictum Hectori, Bologna 1523.
10. Eadie MJ. A pathology of the animal spirits—the clinical neurology of Thomas Willis (1621–1675) part I—background, and disorders of intrinsically normal animal spirits. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:14-29.
11. Swanson LW. What is the brain? Trends Neurosci 2000;23:519-27.
12. Willis T. Cerebri anatome cui accessit nervorum descriptio et usus. London: Flesher, Martyn & Allestry; 1664.
13. Vieussens R. Neurographia universalis. Lugduni: Certe 1684.
14. Vicq d’Azyr F. Traite´ d’anatomie et de physiologie. Paris: Didot 1786.
15. Sarikcioglu L, Altun U, Suzen B, Oguz N. The evolution of the terminology of the basal ganglia, or are they nuclei? J Hist Neurosci 2008;17:226-9.
16. Reil JC. Das verlangerte Rückenmark, die hinteren, seitlichen und vorderen Schenkel des kleinen Gehirns und die theils strangformig, theils als Ganglienkette in der Axe des Rückenmarks und des Gehirns fortlaufende graue Substanz. Archiv Physiol (Halle) 1809;9:485-524.
17. Gall FJ, Spurzheim JK. Anatomie et physiologie du syste`me nerveux en ge´ne´ral et du cerveau en particulier. Paris: Schoell 1810.
18. Solly S. The Human Brain: Its Configuration, Structure, Development and Physiology. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans 1836.
19. Ferrier D. The functions of the brain. London: Smith, Elder & Co; 1876.
20. Wilson SAK. Progressive lenticular degeneration: a familial nervous disease associated with cirrhosis of the liver. Brain 1912:34:295-507.
21. Prus J. Uber die Leitungsbahnen und Pathogenese der Rindenepilepsie. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1898;11:857- 63.