Allergic reactions to local anesthetics: should we test those with drug allergies and atopy history?

Allergic reactions to local anesthetics: should we test those with drug allergies and atopy history?

Aim: Many patients are referred to allergy clinics for allergy tests to local anesthetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a history of atopy and drug hypersensitivity on allergy tests made with local anesthetics. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the records of patients referred to our clinic within a 5-year period because of a suspicion of allergy to local anesthetics, and who were applied with skin tests and subcutaneous challenge tests. Results: Evaluation was made of a total of 138 patients, comprising 114 (82.6%) females and 24 (17.4%) males with a mean age of 45.35 ± 14.13 years. A reaction during a dental procedure was reported in 99 (71.7%) patients. Mepivacaine was the most tested local anesthetic (n = 66, 40.2%). A positive reaction was determined in the skin tests made with local anesthetics in 6 (4.3%) patients. Lidocaine was the local anesthetic most often showing a positive reaction (n = 3, 50%). A history of atopy was present in 30 (21.7%) patients. No correlation was determined between atopy history and the development of a positive reaction to local anesthetics (p = 0.086). In the cases determined with a positive reaction to local anesthetics, there was a greater rate of history of hypersensitivity to drugs other than local anesthetics (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Patients with a history of drug hypersensitivity reaction should be tested in respect of local anesthetic allergy prior to a procedure to be made with local anesthetics.

___

  • 1. Kvisselgaard AD, Mosbech HF, Fransson S, et al. Risk of Immediate-Type Allergy to Local Anesthetics Is Overestimated Results from 5 Years of Provocation Testing in a Danish Al lergy Clinic. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(4):1217-23.
  • 2. Bhole MV, Manson AL, Seneviratne SL, et al. IgE-mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(6):903-11.
  • 3. Kvisselgaard AD, Kroigaard M, Mosbech HF, et al. No cases of perioperative allergy to local anaesthetics in the Danish Anaes thesia Allergy Centre. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61(2):149- 55.
  • 4. Ring J, Franz R, Brockow K. Anaphylactic reactions to local anesthetics. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2010;95:190-200.
  • 5. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacolog ical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(2):90-101; quiz 2-3.
  • 6. Malinovsky JM, Chiriac AM, Tacquard C, et al. Allergy to local anesthetics: Reality or myth? Presse Med. 2016;45(9):753-7.
  • 7. Erdeljic V, Francetic I, Likic R, et al. Is referring patients with a positive history of allergic drug reactions or atopy for allergy testing to local anesthetics justified? Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009;31(3):177-82.
  • 8. Bina B, Hersh EV, Hilario M, et al. True Allergy to Amide Local Anesthetics: A Review and Case Presentation. Anesth Prog. 2018;65(2):119-23.
  • 9. I YI, Özdemir SK, Aydin Ö, et al. Local anesthetics allergy: who should be tested? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;50(2):66- 71.
  • 10. Petersen TH, Bohlke A. [Allergic reactions to local anaesthetics]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018;180(39).
  • 11. Eggleston ST, Lush LW. Understanding allergic reactions to lo cal anesthetics. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30(7-8):851-7.
  • 12. Morais-Almeida M, Gaspar A, Marinho S, et al. Allergy to lo cal anesthetics of the amide group with tolerance to procaine. Allergy. 2003;58(8):827-8.
  • 13. Cuesta-Herranz J, de las Heras M, Fernandez M, et al. Allergic reaction caused by local anesthetic agents belonging to the amide group. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(3):427-8.
  • 14. Nakamura N, Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Masuda K, et al. Immediate-type allergic reactions to local anesthetics. Allergol Int. 2018;67(1):160-1.
  • 15. Gülbahar O, Mete N. Allergic Reactions Due to Local Anes thetics: Are They As Frequent as Expected? T Clin J Allergy Asthma. 2002;4(3):109-14.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A comparison of preoperative and postoperative anxiety levels affecting preoperative and postoperative processes of orthopedics patients

Muhammed Çağatay ENGİN, Serdar TOY, Mehmet Cenk TURGUT

Laparoscopic modified subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe method in the management of mirizzi syndrome type I

Ali Kemal KAYAPINAR, Hilal ŞAHİN

Educated platelets promote wound healing via anti-inflammatory effect and down-regulated VEGF and MMP-9

Sefa KURT, Başak BAYKARA, Osman YILMAZ, Fırat YILMAZ, Orkun ILGEN

The relationship of systemic inflammatory parameters with mortality and prognosis in patients with COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke

Dilek YILMAZ OKUTAN, Meltem KARACAN GÖLEN

Effectiveness of isokinetic exercise on pain and function in patients with total knee arthroplasty

Deniz DÜLGEROĞLU, Natalya ÖZEN, Nihal TEZER, Yasemin TOMBAK, Zeynep AYKIN

Comparison of self-expanding metal stent results in esophagogastrostomy and esophagojejunostomy anastomotic leak: a three-center retrospective analysis

Ali Kemal KAYAPINAR, Erkan OYMACI, Süleyman GÜNAY, Durmuş Ali ÇETİN, Bülent ÇALIK, Kemal Erdinc KAMER, Mehmet YILDIRIM

The effects of shoulder and hip widths on the acetabular angle in hip arthroplasty performed in the lateral decubitus position. Trochanter/shoulder ratio effect on postop inclination

Abdülkadir POLAT, Abdulhamit MISIR, Mehmet ÖZBEY BÜYÜKKUŞÇU, Fırat FİDAN, Seçkin BASILGAN

Does liver density change in computed tomography in COVID-19 patients?

Ahmet BOZDAĞ, Pınar GÜNDOĞAN BOZDAĞ, Gülden ESER KARLIDAĞ, Mehmet KALAYCI

Evaluation of neonatal intensive care unit mortality

Şehribanu IŞIK, Dursun TÜRKBAY, Gülsüm KADIOĞLU ŞİMŞEK, Hayriye Gözde KANMAZ, Fuat Emre CANPOLAT

Single center experience with cardiac device infection: Importance of periprocedural precautions

Ersin DOĞANÖZÜ, Burcu UĞURLU ILGIN, Dilek DÜLGER