Fatma Tülin ÖZBAŞER, Fatih ATASOY, İrfan GÜNGÖR, Evren ERDEM

Filo güvercinlerinde (Columba livia domestica) bazı morfolojik özellikler

Bu araştırma Türkiye’de yetiştirilen filo güvercinlerin canlı ağırlık ve çeşitli morfolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıylayapılmıştır. Araştırma 2013 yılında sekiz işletmede, 119 erkek ve 56 dişi olmak üzere toplam 175 güvercin üzerinde yürütülmüştür.Güvercinlerde bireysel olarak vücut rengi, nişane, baş tipi, tepelilik, göz rengi, paçalılık, kuyruk telek sayısı belirlenmiştir.Ortalama canlı ağırlık değeri 428.85±5.67 g, vücut uzunluğu 36.48±0.20 cm, gövde uzunluğu 10.09±0.09 cm, kanat açıklığı ve uzunluğu67.67±0.26 cm ve 31.34±0.05 cm, kuyruk uzunluğu 12.32±0.08 cm, göğüs çevresi, genişliği ve derinliği 22.11±0.11 cm,56.02±0.42 cm, 65.03±0.66 cm, baş uzunluğu ve genişliği 55.09±0.41 cm ve 21.60±0.16 cm, gaga uzunluğu ve derinliği 17.39±0.22cm ve 6.78±0.07 cm, incik çapı 4.36±0.04 cm’ dir. Canlı ağırlık (P

Some morphological characteristics of squadron flyer pigeons (Columba livia domestica)

The aim of this study is to determine morphological characteristics of pigeons in Turkey. The study was conducted with 175 pigeons (including 119 males and 56 female) which were reared in eight different enterprises in 2013. Some morphological parameters (coat color, markings, head type, eye color, rough footed, the number of tail flight feathers and typical feathering form on the head) and morphometric measurements [(body weight (428.85±5.67 g) and length (36.48±0.20 cm), trunk length (10.09±0.09 cm), wing span (67.67 ±0.26 cm) and length (31.34±0.05 cm), tail length (12.32±0.08 cm), thoracic perimeter (22.11±0.11 cm), chest width (56.02±0.42 cm) and depth (65.03±0.66 cm), head length and width (55.09±0.41 cm and 21.60±0.16 cm), bill length and depth (17.39±0.22 mm and 6.78±0.07 mm), tarsus diameter (4.36±0.04 cm)] were determined individually. While body weight (P < 0.01), body length (P < 0.05), wing span (P < 0.001), tail length (P < 0.01), chest depth (P < 0.05), bill length (P < 0.05) and bill depth (P < 0.01) were affected by age, wing span (P < 0.05), wing length (P < 0.01), chest depth (P < 0.01), bill length (P < 0.05), and tarsus diameter (P < 0.05) were affected by sex. In conclusion, due to the body weight, body length, wing span, tail length, chest depth, bill length and bill depth were affected by age, body development was sustained until later periods of growth.

PDF

___

1. Alarcon DS, Parker PG (2007): Sexual size dimorphism and morphological evidence supporting the recognition of two subspecies in the galapagos dove. The condor, 109, 132-141.
2. Anonim (2014a): Şanlıurfa’da kuşçuluk. http://www.taklaci guvercin.com/makale8.htm, 16.06.2014.
3. Anonim (2014b): The Scandaroon, Part 2. http://www.aviculture-europe.nl/nummers/09E05A05.pdf, 20.07.2014.
4. Anonim (2014c): Doğan güvercin. http://doganguvercin.com/ bagdatirk.htm, 20.07.2014.
5. Anonim (2014d): Şanlıurfa’da filo uçucusu güvercini yetiştiricileri ile söyleşi Şanlıurfa, 07.06.2013.
6. Atasoy F, Erdem E, Hacan ÖG (2013): Ankara İlinde yetiştirilen taklacı güvercinlerde (Columba livia domestica) morfolojik özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg., 60, 135-143.
7. Balcı F, Alpay F, Soyudal B, Ardıçlı S, Yılmaz M, Dinçel D (2010): Bursa oynarı güvercinlerin ırk özellikleri. http://www.inegoloynar.com/pdf/Bursa_Oynari.pdf, 20.6.2014.
8. Baumel JJ (1993): Hand book of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium. Nuttall ornithological club. Cambridge, Massachusetts. http://www.oucom.ohiou.edu/dbms-witmer/ Downloads/1993_Baumel_&_Witmer_NAA-2_Osteologia. pdf, 20.06.2014.
9. Bugoni L, Furness RW (2009): Age composition and sexual size dimorphism of albatrosses and petrels off Brazil. Marine Ornithology, 37, 253-260.
10. Burley N (1981): The evolution of sexual indistingguishability. 121-137 in Natural Selection and Social Behavior (R. Alexander and R.Tinkle, eds.). Chiron Press, New York.
11. Damian D, Chirilean I, Gudea A, Stan F, Dezdrobitu C, Irimescu I, Crisan M, Burian S (2011): Anatomical Features of Bones Directly Involved in the Act of Flying in the Homing Pigeon and in the Common Pigeon. Bulletin UASVM, Veterinary Medicine 68, 121-128.
12. Dawson, B, and Trapp R (2001): Basic and clinical biostatistics. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. De Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFA, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001): Safring Bird Ringing Manual, ADU guide 5. Cape Town: Avian Demography Unit, University of Cape Town.
14. Farhat A, Chavez ER (2000): Comparative performance, blood chemistry, carcass composition of two lines of Pekin ducks reared mixed or separated by sex. Poultry Science, 79, 460-465.
15. Gayathri KL, Shenoy KB, Hegde SN (2004): Blood profile of pigeons (columba livia) during growth and breeding. Comparative biochemistry and physiology - part A, 138, 187-192.
16. Herman C (2009): A study of Romanıan pıgeon races. Medicine doktora tezi, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-napoca Doctoral School Faculty of Veterinary Cluj-Napoca.
17. Heyman P, Hume R (2005): Kuş Gözlemcisinin Cep Kitabı, Avrupanın Kuşları, Kuş Araştırmaları Derneği Yayınları, Ankara, 143-145.
18. İşçen Y (2014): Ülkemizde yetiştirilen güvercin ırkları. http://guvercinturleri. blogspot.com.tr/, 20.07.2014. 19. Johnston R, Johnson S (1989): Nonrandom mating in feral pigeons. Condor. 91, 23-29.
20. Johnston RF (1990): Variation in size and shape in pigeons, columba livia. Wilson Bull. 102, 213-225.
21. Johnston RF, Janiga M (1995): Feral pigeons. Oxford Universty Press. http://books.google.com.tr/, 23.06.2014.
22. Larzul C, Guy G, Bernadet DM (2004): Feed efficiency, growth and carcass traits in female mule duck. European Poultry Science, 68, 265-268.
23. Minvielle F, Gandemer G, Maeda Y, Leborgne C, Hirigoyen E, Boulay M (2010): Carcase characteristics of a heavy Japanese quail line under introgression with the roux gene. British Poultry Science, 41, 41-45.
24. Pennycuick CJ(2008): Modelling the Flying Bird. http://books.google.com.tr, 23.6.2014.
25. Reynolds SJ, Martin GR, Wallace LL, Wearn CP (2008): Sexing sooty terns on Ascension Island from morphometric measurements. Journal of Zoology. 274, 2-8.
26. Rose E, Nagel P, Haag-Wackernagel D (2006): Spatiotemporal use of the urban habitat by feral pigeons (Columba livia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol., 60, 242-254.
27. Sarıöz N, Atasoy F (2012): Evcil güvercinlerde (taklaci) kuluçka, yaşama gücü ve büyüme özellikleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 52, 21-23.
28. Saygılı F (2005): Kapulukaya Baraj Gölü (Kızılırmak, Türkiye) Civarına Göç Eden Delıchon Urbıca (LİNNAEUS,1758) (AVES:PASSERIFORMES)’nın Davranış, Yuvalanma ve Üreme Biyolojisi Üzerine Gözlemler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim dalı, Ankara.
29. Sezer M, Berberoglu E, Ulutas Z (2006): Genetic association between sexual maturity and weekly live-weights in laying-type Japanese quail. SA Journal of Animal Science, 36, 142-148.
30. Sosyal Mİ, Gürcan EK, Akar T, Alter K, Genç S (2011): Trakya’da yetiştirilen Trakya makaracı güvercin ırkının çeşitli morfolojik özelliklerinin saptanması. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, 61-68.
31. Téguia A, Mafouo Ngandjou H, Defang H, Tchoumboue J (2008): Study of the live body weight and body characteristics of the african muscovy duck (Caraina moschata). Tropical Animal Health and Production, 40, 5- 10.
32. Yılmaz O, Boz MA (2012): Türkiye’de amatör güvercin yetiştiriciliğinin durumu ve kullanılan yöresel tip sınıflandırılmaları. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 1, 45-60.