Pandemi Sürecinde Ortaokul Öğretmenlerinin Eğitimde Teknoloji Entegrasyonuna İlişkin Bakış Açılarının İncelenmesi

Bu çalışmada, pandemi sürecinde (COVID-19) ortaokul öğretmenlerinin eğitimde teknoloji entegrasyonuna yönelik tutum ve görüşlerinin nasıl etkilendiği incelenmiştir. Çalışma, fenomenoloji deseninde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu farklı branşlarda görev yapan 25 ortaokul öğretmeni oluşturmuştur. Açık uçlu soru formuyla veriler elde edilmiştir. Araştırma verileri 2019- 2020 akademik yılının bahar döneminde toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, araştırmaya katılan öğretmenlerin öğretme ve öğrenme sürecinde teknoloji entegrasyonuna yönelik algılarının genel olarak olumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak, öğretmenler bu süreçte yaşadıkları olumsuz deneyimleri internet problemleri, internet kullanımına yönelik becerilerinin eksik olması, aile desteğinin olmaması, motivasyon problemleri, yetersiz dönüt, zaman kısıtlaması ve uygun olmayan ev ortamı olarak belirtmişlerdir.

Exploring Perspectives of Secondary School Teachers on Technology Integration in Education During Pandemic

This paper investigates how Covid-19 pandemic influenced secondary school teachers’ attitudes andopinions towards technology integration in education. For this purpose, the study was conducted inphenomenological design. The participants of the study consisted of 25 secondary school teachersof different branches. Open-ended question form was used to obtain data. The data were collectedduring the spring semester of 2019-2020 academic year. According to the findings of the study, it isevident that perceptions of teachers participated in the study about technology integration in teachingand learning process are positive in general. However, teachers stated their negative experiences suchas internet problems, lack of internet competence, lack of family support, motivational problems,insufficient feedback, time limitation and inappropriate home environment.

___

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749- 5978(91)90020-T
  • Araujo L., & Luiz, A. (2015). Determinants of the use of technological innovation in distance learning: A study with business school instructors. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 19-37.
  • Arntzen, J., & Krug, D. (2011). ICT ecologies of learning: Active socially engaged learning, resiliency and leadership. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Adaptation, resistance and access to instructional technologies: Assessing future trends in education (pp. 332-354). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference
  • Becker, H. (2000). Internet use by teachers. In R. Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 80-111). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  • Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8- 14. doi: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
  • Bleakley, D., & Mangin, M. (2013). Easier said than done: Leading technology integration. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 16(1), 14- 26. doi:10.1177/1555458912475213
  • Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: A quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers & Education, 52(2), 376-380.
  • Carr-Chellman, A. A., & Dyer, D. (2000). The pain and the ecstacy: Pre-service teacher perceptions on changing teacher roles and technology. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2), 96-105.
  • Cha, H., Park, T., & Seo, J. (2020). What should be considered when developing ICT-Integrated classroom models for a developing country?. Sustainability, 12, 1-19. doi: 10.3390/su12072967
  • Chan, T. F. I., Borja, M., Welch, B., & Batiuk, M. E. (2016). Predicting the probability for faculty adopting an audience response system in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15, 395-407. doi:10.28945/3548
  • Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Daniel, T., & Tivener, K. (2016). Effects of sharing clickers in an active learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 260-268.
  • Demir, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2011). Primary mathematics teachers’ views about their competencies concerning the integration of techonology. Elementary Education Online, 10(3), 850-860.
  • Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, M. H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245-256.
  • Depdiknas, A. (2003). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.
  • Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1177/0047239520934018
  • Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. The Lancet Infectious diseases, 20, 533-534. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1.
  • Edgar, T. W., & Manz, D. O. (2017). Research methods for cyber security. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Inc.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development,47(4), 47-61.
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423- 435.
  • Espino-Díaz, L., Fernandez-Caminero, G., Hernandez Lloret, C. M., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, H., & Alvarez Castillo, J. L. (2020). Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on education professionals. Toward a paradigm shift: ICT and neuroeducation as a binomial of action. Sustainability, 12, 1-10. doi: 10.3390/su12145646
  • Fitriyadi, H. (2013). Integrasi teknologi informasi komunikasi dalam pendidikan: Potensi manfaat, masyarakat bersasis pengetahuan, pendidikan nilai, strategi implmentasi dan pengembangan profesional. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kejuruan, 21(3), 269-284.
  • Francom, G. M. (2020). Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2019.1679055
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410- 8415.
  • Gibbone, A., Rukavina, P., & Silverman, S. (2010). Technology integration in secondary physical education: Teachers’ attitudes and practice. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 27-42.
  • Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACe Journal, 16(1), 21-46.
  • Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392-402.
  • Hartman, R. J., Townsend, M. B., & Jackson, M. (2019). Educators’ perceptions of technology integration into the classroom: a descriptive case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 236-249. doi: 10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0044
  • Hashmi, Z. F., Dahar, M. A., & Sharif, A. (2019). Role of information and communication technology in motivating university undergraduate students towards a learning task in public sector universities of Rawalpindi city. International Educational Research, 2(2), 26-35. doi:10.35248/2375-4435.19.7.196
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  • Hixon, E., & Buckenmeyer, J. (2009). Revisiting technology integration in schools: Implications for professional development. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 130- 146.
  • Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (2010). Mathematics education and technology - rethinking the terrain. Berlin: Springer.
  • Hsu, P. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 60(1), 30-40.
  • Idris, N., & Nor, N. M. (2010). Mathematical creativity: Usage of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1963-1967.
  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010b). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937-944.
  • Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid 19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52, 145-158. doi:10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
  • Kim, H. J., & Jang, H. Y. (2020). Sustainable technology integration in underserved area schools: The impact of perceived student change on teacher continuance intention. Sustainability, 12, 1-13. doi:10.3390/su12124802
  • Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809-829.
  • König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608-622. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
  • Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing student teachers’ self efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121-128.
  • Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48, 474-494.
  • Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012-1022.
  • Merc, A. (2015). Using technology in classroom: A study with Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 229-240.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Nitel veri analizi. (Çev. Ed. S. Akbaba-Altun ve A. Ersoy). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching learning in higher education during lockdown period of Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
  • Molins-Ruano, P., Sevilla, C., Santini, S., Haya, P. A., Rodríguez, P., & Sacha, G. M. (2014). Designing videogames to improve students’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 571-579.
  • Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2016). Content analysis. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of political communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Neuman,W. L. (2012). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (5. Baskı). (Çev. S. Özge). İstanbul:Yayın Odası.
  • Norhayati, A. M., & Siew, P. H. (2004). Malaysian perspective: Designing interactive multimedia learning environment for moral values education. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 143-152.
  • Nuere, S., & de Miguel, L. (2020). The digital/technological connection with Covid-19: An unprecedented challenge in university teaching. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10758- 020-09454-6.
  • Ottenbreit–Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335.
  • Onalan, O., & Kurt, G. (2020). Exploring Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions of the factors affecting technology integration: A case study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 626-646.
  • Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101-110.
  • Park, J. (2014). Pre-service and in-service teachers' perceptions toward white board system prior to actual experience. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 262-270.
  • Parr, J. M. (1999). Going to school the technological way: Co-constructed classrooms and student perceptions of learning with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 365-377.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). ICT in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam’s baseline situation at the start of ‘The Year of ICT. Computers & Education, 56(4), 974-982.
  • Petersen, D., Finnegan J., & Spencer, H. (2015). Anticipating change, sparking innovation: framing the future. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S1), 46-49. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302379
  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112.
  • Shelly, G. B., Gunter, G. A., & Gunter, R. E. (2010). Teachers discovering computers intergrating technology and digital media in the classroom. USA: Course Technology.
  • Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive learning and technology usage for creativity development in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(1), 95-109. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9067
  • Siegel, C., & Claydon, J. (2016). Innovation in higher education: the influence of classroom design and instructional technology. Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(2), 24-33.
  • Singh, G., & Hardaker, G. (2014). Barriers and enablers to adoption and diffusion of eLearning. A systematic review of the literature - a need for an integrative approach. Education + Training, 56(3), 105-121. doi:10.1108/ET-11-2012-0123
  • Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289- 306. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
  • Vann, P., Sanchez, B., & Santiago, H. (2015). Mobile technology in second language classrooms: Insights into its uses, pedagogical implications, and teacher beliefs. Cambridge University Press, 27(3), 288-303.
  • Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 252- 271.
  • Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250.
  • Williams, M., Warner, W., Flower, J., & Croom, B. (2014). Accessibility and usage of technology by North Carolina agriculture teachers. Journal of Argicultural Education, 55(4), 191-205.
  • Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
  • Xie, X., & Siau, K. (2020). Online education during and after Covid-19 pandemic. TREOs. 93. https://aisel.aisnet.org/treos_amcis2020/93
  • Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (6th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers' perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311-333.