Hale ÖKTEM, Tuğçe ŞENÇELİKEL, Ece AKÇİÇEK, A. KOÇYİĞİT, U. PENEKLİ, Sezin SUNGUR, Beste TANRIYAKUL, Merve İZCİ

Contribution of 3D modeling to anatomy education: a pilot study

Objectives: Traditional anatomy education involves theoretical lectures and practical applications, including examination ofcadavers and models. In recent years, new technologies in biomedical fields have included three-dimensional (3D) modelingtechniques that enable rapid creation of a 3D computer version of physical models. Such 3D modeling can be used as anactive educational tool that enables students to better understand organs and how these organs are positioned relative toone another in anatomy education. The aim of this study was to analyze how the active role and involvement of students in3D modeling contributes to anatomy education and 3D thinking.Methods: In this study, 29 Term II students studying in the Baflkent University School of Medicine were enrolled with 3D modelingtraining based on an anonymized CT sample. In addition to defining anatomic structures observed in the sections, 3Dimages of the common carotid artery, thyroid gland and trachea were obtained using the TT3D-BMMP software, and the positionof these structures relative to one another was evaluated. The results of the anatomy quizzes given before and after the 3Dmodeling training were statistically evaluated.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the results of the quizzes administered before and after thetraining (p<0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was found between male and female students in terms of thequiz results before training, while a significant difference was found in the quiz results after training.Conclusion: We believe that sectional and radiological identification and recognition of anatomical structures by the studentsthrough 3D modeling will facilitate their anatomy education and be beneficial in terms of clinical practices in thefuture.

Keywords:

3D modeling, anatomy, education,

PDF

___

Referans1 Vaccarezza M. Best evidence of anatomy education? Insights from the most recent literature. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 11(2):215-216. doi: 10.1002/ase.1740.
Referans2 Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy Clinical Anatomy 1999; 12:110-4.
Referans3 Winkelmann A. Germany Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007; 41(1):15-22.
Referans4 Garas M., Vaccarezza M., Newland G. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study. Ann Anat 2018; 219:57- 66.
Referans5 Bayko S , Yarkan İ , Çetkin M , Kutoğlu T . Views of medical students on anatomy education supported by plastinated cadavers. Anat 2018; 12(2): 90-6.
Referans6 Bücking TM, Hill ER, Robertson JL, Maneas E, Plumb AA, Nikitichev DI. From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178540.
Referans7 Abouhasem Y, Dayal M ,Savanah S, Štrkalj G. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Med Educ Online 2015; 20:29847.
Referans8 Rehman FU, Khan SN, Yunus SM. Students, perception of computer assisted teaching and learning of anatomy – In a scenario where cadavers are lacking. Biomed Res 2012; 23:215–8.
Referans9 Cui D, Wilson TD, Rockhold RW, Lehman MN, Lynch JC. Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for ﬁrst year medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2017; 10:34–45.
Referans10 Pugliese L, Marconi S, Negrello E, Mauri V, Peri A, Gallo V, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa A. The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery . Updates Surg 2018; 70(3):381-8..doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0586-5.
Referans 11 Krauel L, Fenollosa F, Riaza L, Pérez M, Tarrado X, Morales A, Gomà J, Mora J. Use of 3D Prototypes for Complex Surgical Oncologic Cases. World J Surg 2016; 40:889- 94.
Referans12 Venail F, Deveze A, Lallemant B, Lallemant B, Guevara N, Mondain M. Enhancement of temporal bone anatomy learning with computer 3D rendered imaging softwares. Med Teach 2010; 32(7):e 282-8.
Referans13 Standring S, editor in chief. Gray’s Anatomy. 39th ed. Philadelphia, USA; 2005.
Referans14 Ozgur Z, Celik S, Govsa F, Ozgur T. Anatomical and surgical aspects of the lobes of the thyroid glands. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268(9):1357-63. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1502-5.
Referans15 Ranade AV, Rai R, Pai MM, Nayak SR, Prakash, Krisnamurthy A, Narayana S. Anatomical variations of the thyroid gland: possible surgical implications. Singapore Med J 2008; 49(10):831-4.
Referans 16 Lin C, Gao J, Zheng H, Zhao J, Yang H, Zheng Y, Cao Y, Chen Y, Wu G, Lin G, Yu J, Li H, Pan H, Liao Q, Zhao Y. When to Introduce Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology into Surgical Residency: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Syst 2019; 43(3):71. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1157-0.
Referans 17 Vorstenbosch MA, Klaassen TP, Donders AR, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF. Learning Anatomy Enhances Spatial Ability. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6(4):257-62. doi: 10.1002/ase.1346.
Referans18 Jamil Z, Saeed A, Madhani S, Baig S, Cheema Z, Fatima SS. Three-dimensional Visualization Software Assists Learning in Students with Diverse Spatial Intelligence in Medical Education. Anat Sci Educ 2018 doi: 10.1002/ase.1828. [Epub ahead of print]
Referans19 Wu AM, Wang K, Wang JS, Chen CH, Yang XD, Ni WF, Hu YZ. The addition of 3D printed models to enhance the teaching and learning of bone spatial anatomy and fractures for undergraduate students: a randomized controlled study. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6(20):403. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.59.
Referans20 Lim KH, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, Adams JW, McMenamin PG. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9(3):213-21. doi: 10.1002/ase.1573.
Referans21 Silén C, Wirell S, Kvist J, Nylander E, Smedby O. Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education. Med Teach 2008; 30(5):e115-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590801932228.