Body donation and digital technology: the ethical issues
Digital technology influences many different areas of society, including body donation and the use of bodies donated to science. It affects the manner in which information arising from bodies donated to science can be generated, gathered and utilised. This includes information arising from medical imaging procedures, photographs, and genomic investigation. However many issues remain unclear in relation to this transaction, including the appropriate level of informed consent, family involvement in decision-making and information sharing, and how commercialisation should be addressed. Highlighting these issues shows there is a distinct lack of empirical evidence with which to guide appropriate use of digital information arising from bodies donated to science, and caution is suggested in regard to the acquisition, distribution, and possible commercialisation of such data.
___
- 1. McMenamin P, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW. The production
of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional
(3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:479–86.
- 2. Gerhard GS, Paynton B, Popoff SN. Integrating cadaver exome
sequencing into a first-year medical student curriculum. JAMA
2016;E1–2.
- 3. Cornwall J, Callahan D, Wee R. Ethical issues surrounding the use
of images from donated cadavers in the anatomical sciences. Clin
Anat 2016;29:30–6.
- 4. Arnar DO, Andersen K, Thorgeirsson G. Genetics of cardiovascular
diseases: lessons learned from a decade of genomics research in
Iceland. Scand Cardiovasc J 2016;1–6.
- 5. Cornwall J. The ethics of 3D-printing body parts from donated
cadavers in medical education and research: what is there to worry
about? Australas Med J 2016;9:8–11.
- 6. Cornwall J, Slatter T, Print C, Guilford P, Henaghan M, Wee R.
Culture, law, ethics, and social implications: is society ready for
advanced genomic medicine? Australas Med J 2014;7:200–2.
- 7. Cornwall J, Winkelmann A, Hildebrandt S. The ethical issues associated
with exome analysis of cadavers donated to medical science.
JAMA 2016;316:102–3.
- 8. Champney T. The business of bodies: ethical perspectives on forprofit
body donation companies. Clin Anat 2016;29:25–9.
- 9. Federative International Committee for Ethics and Medical
Humanities guidelines, Recommendations of Good Practice for the
Donation and Study of Human Bodies and Tissues for Anatomical
Examination (2012). [Internet] [Cited 2017 Apr 8]. Available from:
http://www.ifaa.net/index.php/ficem
- 10. Greely HT, Cho MK. The Henrietta Lacks legacy grows. EMBO
Rep 2013;14:849.
- 11. Anon. [Internet] [Cited 2017 Apr 8]. Available from: http://www.news.
com.au/technology/online/high-school-student-sparks-anger-afterposting-
selfie-with-dead-body/story-fnjwmwrh-1226820128333.
- 12. Bond A. 2013. ‘Hello from the stiffs!’ University staff disciplined for
posting pictures of body parts on Instagram in Switzerland.
[Internet] [Cited 2017 Apr 8]. Available from: http://www.dailymail.
co.uk/ news/article-2383718/Zurich-University-staff-disciplined-
posting-pictures-body-parts-Instagram Switzerland.html
#ixzz3h3LtLi42
- 13. Olejaz M, Hoeyer K. Meet the donors: a qualitative analysis of
what donation means to Danish whole body donors. Eur J Anat
2016;20:19–29.