Samet ERİNÇ, Irfan ESENKAYAE, OĞUZ ŞÜKRÜ POYANLI, Burak ÖZTURAN, Muzaffer AYAZ, Afşar TİMUÇİN ÖZTÜRK

Ultrasonographic comparison of bilateral patellar tendon dimensions in patients treated via intramedullary tibial nailing using a transpatellar approach

Objective: One of the most common complications following intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture is anterior knee pain. The etiology of pain remains unclear. Patellar tendon entry point is the most suspected reason for anterior knee pain. This study, sonographically examined the patellar tendons of patients treated via intramedullary nailing. Methods: Thirty-two patients with a tibial shaft fracture requiring intramedullary nailing via a transpatellar approach were included in the study. After all patients were grouped by reference to the presence of anterior knee pain, bilateral patellar tendon ultrasonography was performed. Results: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. Patients were measured postop average in 38.3 months (10th months - 84th months). It was determined that 10 patients of total 32 (31.3%) had anterior knee pain. There were no statistically differences between study groups in the length of patellar tendon. In the painless group; patellar tendon was wider and thicker in the operated side than the non operated side. The mean differences in the thickness between operated side versus non e operated side of the painless group were 5.3 ± 1.8 in the operated side and 3.9 ± 1.4 in the non e operated side (p ¼ 0.007 < 0.05). The corresponding values for width of the patellar tendon was 29.6 ± 3.3 in the operated side and 27.6 ± 3.8 in the non e operated side (p ¼ 0.007 ˂ 0.05). As a result, there were no statistically significant differences between width and thickness of the patellar tendons in the painful group, on the contrary, in the painless group; patellar tendons were wider and thicker in the operated side than those in the non - operated side. Mean values for thickness of the operated and non-operated side were 5.9 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 2.0, respectively (p ¼ 0.059 > 0.05). Mean values for width of the operated and non-operated side were 30.2 ± 4.5 and 28.5 ± 4.0, respectively (p ¼ 0.103 > 0,05). Conclusion: Based on the ultrasonographic investigation of their patellar tendons after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture, in the painless patients group; the patellar tendon was wider and thicker in the operated side than the non e operated side, however, in the painful patients there were no statistically significant differences between this parameters. Although the number of patients was not sufficient to conclude precise relation between patellar tendon entry point and anterior knee pain, we determined that thicker and wider tendon might be less related to anterior knee pain.

___

Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM. Closed intramedullary tibial nailing. Its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4): 605e611. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380211.

Toivanen JAK, Honkonen SE, Koivisto AM, Jarvinen MJ. Treatment of lowenergy tibial shaft fractures:plaster cast compared with intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2001;25(2):110e113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640000083.

Haas N, Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Frigg R, Tscherne H. A new solid unreamed tibial nail for shaft fractures with severe soft tissue injury. Injury. 1993;24(1): 49e54. https://doi:10.1016/0020-1383(93)90084-J.

Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw a D. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;11(2): 103e105. https://doi:10.1097/00005131-199702000-00006.

Bhattacharyya T, Seng K, Nassif NA, Freedman I. Knee pain after tibial nailing: the role of nail prominence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449(449):303e307. https://doi:10.1016/S0276-1092(08)70092-0.

Song SY, Chang HG, Byun JC, Kim TY. Anterior knee pain after tibial intramedullary nailing using a medial paratendinous approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(3):172e177. https://doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182217fe6.

Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Paakkala T, Jarvela T, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: an ultrasound study of the patellar tendons of 36 patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(5):311e316. https://doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000154480.20509.0d.

Keating JF, Orfaly R, O'Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):10e13. https://doi:10.1097/00005131-199701000-00004.

Sala F, Binda M, Lovisetti G. Anterior gonalgic syndrome after intramedullary nailing: ultrasound and radiologic study. Chir Organi Mov. 1998;83(3): 271e275.

CourteBrown CM. Fractures of the tibia and fibula. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:1939e2001.

Court-Brown CM, McQueen M, Quaba A, Christie J. Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(6):959e964. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1955445.

Bone LB, Sucato D, Stegemann PM, Rohrbacher BJ. Displaced isolated fractures of the tibial shaft treated with either a cast or intramedullary nailing. An outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(9): 1336e1341. https://doi:10.1055/s-0028-1100902.

Karladani a H, Granhed H, Edshage B, Jerre R, Styf J. Displaced tibial shaft fractures: a prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(2):160e167. https://doi:10.1080/000164700317413139.

Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(5):576e580. https://doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.16875.

Vaistö O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an eight-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1511e1516. https://doi:10.1097/TA. 0b013e318031cd27.

Alho A, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K. Nonunion of tibial shaft fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing without bone grafting. J Trauma. 1993;34(1): 62e67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199301000-00011.

Keating J, Kuo R, Court-Brown C. Bifocal fractures of the tibia and fibula. Incidence, classification and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76-B(3):395e400. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.76B3.8175840.

Adriani E, Mariani PP, Maresca G, Santori N. Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3(3):138e143. https://doi:10.1007/BF01565472.

Karjalainen PT, Ahovuo J, Pihlajamaki HK, Soila K, Aronen HJ. Postoperative MR imaging and ultrasonography of surgically repaired achilles tendon ruptures. Acta Radiol. 1996;37(3P2):639e646. https://doi:10.1177/02841851960373P244.

Devitt AT, Coughlan KA, Ward T, McCormack D, Mulcahy D, Felle P, et al. Patellofemoral contact forces and pressures during intramedullary tibial nailing. Int Orthop. 1998;22(2):92e96. https://doi:10.1007/s002640050216.

McConnell T, Tornetta P, Tilzey J, Casey D. Tibial portal placement: the radiographic correlate of the anatomic safe zone. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(3): 207e209. https://doi:10.1097/00005131-200103000-00010.

Tornetta P, Riina J, Geller J, Purban W. Intraarticular anatomic risks of tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(4):247e251. https://doi:10.1097/00005131- 199905000-00004.