Kenan KOCA, Şafak EKİNCİ, Serkan AKPANCAR, Muhammed Hanifi GEMCİ, ÖMER ERŞEN, Faruk AKYILDIZ

An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates

Background: The aim of this study was to present characteristics and publication patterns of studies arisefrom orthopedic theses obtained from National Thesis Center; database in terms of publication years,study types, topics, level of evidence between 1974 and 2014.Methods: Firstly, National Thesis Center database was searched for orthopedics and Traumatology theses.The theses, which their summary or full text were available were included in the study. The topics, studytypes and quality of study designs were reviewed. Then theses were searched in the PubMed database.Journals of published theses were classiŞed according to category, scope and impact factors of the year2014. Results: 1508 theses were included into the study. Clinical studies comprised 71,7% of the theses, while25,6% of the theses were non-clinical experimental and 2,7% of the theses were observational studies.Clinical studies were Level I in 8,6% (n¼ 93) and Level II in 5,8% of the theses (n ¼ 63). A total of 224theses (14,9%) were published in the journals indexed in PubMed database from 1974 to 2012. Fifty-two(23,2%) were published in SCI; 136 theses (60,7%) were published in SCI-E journals and 36 theses (16%)were published in other Journals indexed in PubMed.Conclusion: The quantity and quality of published theses need to be improved and effective measuresshould be taken to promote quality of theses. Theses from universities and Training hospitals which didnot allow open access, and; incomplete records of the National Thesis Center database were majorlimitations of this study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

___

Arriola-Quiroz I, Curioso WH, Cruz-Encarnacion M, Gayoso O. Characteristics and publication patterns of theses from a Peruvian Medical School. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27:148e154.

Bordons M, Zulueta MA. Evaluation of the scientiŞc activity through biblio- metric indices. Rev Espanola Cardiol. 1999;52:790e800.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendations. http://www2.aaos.org/bulletin/apr05/fline9.asp Accessed 21 March 2015.

Thompson ScientiŞc. Journal Citation Reports. http://science.thomsonreuters. com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi Accessed 21 March 2015.

National Library of Medicine Report. http://locatorplus.gov/cgibin/Pwebrecon. cgi?PAGE¼sbSearch&SEQ¼20160106161608&PID¼-jITHFzwEZHyelEI7_

sk3TMF4NlrR Accessed 07 January 2016.

Ozyalcin H, Sesli E. Temporary prostheticŞtting for below-knee amputation. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1989;13:86e89.

Bosker BH, Verheyen CC. Th e international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000 to 2004. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2006;88: 156e158.

Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Japan's share of articles in orthopedics. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:607e609.

Gurbuz Y, Sugun TS, Ozaksar K. A bibliometric analysis of orthopedic publica- tions originating from Turkey. Acta Orthop traumatologica turcica. 2015;49: 57e66.

Ozgen U, Egri M, Aktas¸ M, et al. Publication pattern of Turkish medical theses: analysis of 22.625 medical theses completed in years 1980-2005. Turk Klin J Med Sci. 2011;31:1122e1131.

Salmi LR, Gana S, Mouillet E. Publication pattern of medical these, France, 1993-98. Med Educ. 2001;35:18e21.

Dhaliwal U, Singh N, Bhatia A. Masters theses from a university medical col- lege: publication in indexed scientiŞc journals. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58: 101e104.

Nieminen P, Sipila K, Takkinen HM, Renko M, Risteli R. Medical these as part of the scientiŞc training in basic medical and dental education: experiences from Finland. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:1.

Guilford WH. Teaching peer review and the process of scientiŞc writing. Adv Physiol Educ. 2001;25:167e175.

Cunningham D, Viola D. Collaboration to teach graduate students how to write more effective theses. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002;90:331e334.