Analytical Process Evaluation of Biochemistry Laboratory by Using Six Sigma Method

Objectives: The primary purpose of medical laboratories is to provide the most accurate results appropriate to the patient’s medical condition. Therefore, the reliability of each laboratory must be scientifically tested. Approximately 10 % of laboratory errors occur in the analytical phase. In this study, we aimed to evaluate analytical process performances of 14 routinely assayed parameters according to Six Sigma methodology. Materials and Methods: Mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated from internal quality control data for 3 months from 14 routinely assayed parameters (albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, chloride, creatinine, glucose, HDL cholesterol, lactate dehydrogenase, potassium, total cholesterol, total protein, sodium, triglyceride and urea) in the laboratory (Roche Cobas c501). Bias was calculated using external quality control values for same months. Total error was also calculated. Acceptable total error was determined according to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and Turkey criteria. Sigma values were calculated and divided into four groups; as 6 world-class performance. Results: According to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and Turkey sigma assessment, first levels of chloride, total cholesterol, glucose and urea performance were unacceptable. Moreover according to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments sigma assessment, first levels of albumin, creatinine, total protein; and both levels of sodium, chloride and urea were unacceptable. Other tests were found to be suited for purpose, acceptable or world-class performance. Conclusions: Sigma measurements should be routinely performed in laboratories for evaluating the analytical period performance of the laboratory. That will increase its quality via regulatory preventive actions. Our study allowed us to see and improve our measurement quality by determining the three-month periodic performance of our laboratory tests.

___

[1] O’Kane M. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2009;404(1):28-31.

[2] Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2006;44(6):750-759.

[3] Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. American journal of clinical pathology. 2006;125(3):343- 354.

[4] Tzortzopoulos A, Raftopoulos V, Talias MA. Performance characteristics of automated clinical chemistry analyzers using commercial assay reagents contributing to quality assurance and clinical decision in a hospital laboratory. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 2020;80(1):46-54.

[5] Westgard JO, Burnett RW, Bowers GN. Quality management science in clinical chemistry: a dynamic framework for continuous improvement of quality. Clinical chemistry. 1990;36(10):1712-1716.

[6] Iqbal S, Mustansar T. Application of Sigma Metrics Analysis for the Assessment and Modification of Quality Control Program in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2017;32(1):106-109.

[7] Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2000;124(4):516-519.

[8] Burtis CA, Bruns DE. Selection and Analytical Evaluation of Methods – With Statistical Techniques. In: Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. Seventh ed. USA: Saunders; 2015.

[9] https://www.aacc.org/cln/articles/2013/september/totalanalytic-error. Accessed 17th March, 2018.

[10] Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clinical chemistry. 1974;20(7):825-833.

[11] Burtis CA, Bruns DE, Ashwood ER. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry And Molecular Diagnostics In: 5th ed.: Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.; 2012.

[12] T.C. Saglik Bakanligi Saglik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlügü Tibbi Laboratuvar Hizmetleri Daire Baskanligi; 95966346 numarali ve İzin Verilen Toplam Hata Sınırları konulu, 13/10/2016 tarihli genelge. http://www.laboratuvar.saglik. gov.tr/Eklenti/2581,genelge-201618izin-verilen-toplamhata-sinirlaripdf.pdf?0. Accessed 10 December, 2016.

[13] Nanda SK, Ray L. Quantitative application of sigma metrics in medical biochemistry. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2013;7(12):2689-2691.

[14] Coskun A. Six Sigma and laboratory consultation. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2007;45(1):121-123.

[15] Westgard JO, Seehafer JJ, Barry PL. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria. Clinical chemistry. 1994;40(7 Pt 1):1228-1232.

[16] Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system. Annals of clinical biochemistry. 2016;53(Pt 1):32-50.

[17] Mao X, Shao J, Zhang B, et al. Evaluating analytical quality in clinical biochemistry laboratory using Six Sigma. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018;28(2):020904-020904.

[18] Gülbahar Ö, Kocabıyık M, Çıracı MZ, et al. The use of six sigma methodology to evaluate the analytical performances of clinical chemistry analyzers. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry. 2018;43(1):1-8.

[19] Korkmaz S. Analitik Evre Performansının Altı Sigma Metodu Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry. 2020;17(3):126-133.

[20] Verma M, Dahiya K, Ghalaut VS, et al. Assessment of quality control system by sigma metrics and quality goal index ratio: A roadmap towards preparation for NABL. World journal of methodology. 2018;8(3):44-50.

[21] Zhou B, Wu Y, He H, et al. Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(1):e23126.

[22] Shaikh MS, Moiz B. Analytical performance evaluation of a high-volume hematology laboratory utilizing sigma metrics as standard of excellence. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2016;38(2):193-197.

[23] Friedecky B, Kratochvila J, Budina M. Why do different EQA schemes have apparently different limits of acceptability? Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2011;49(4):743-745.
Acta Medica-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-9488
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Utilization of Synthetic Hematocrit Derived from Cardiac MRI for Estimating Extracellular Volume

Ahmet Gürkan ERDEMİR, Tuncay HAZIROLAN, Ekim GÜLER, Osman ÖCAL

Analytical Process Evaluation of Biochemistry Laboratory by Using Six Sigma Method

Dilara BAL TOPÇU, Ahmet ÖZSOY, Fatma UÇAR, Ali YALÇINDAĞ, Yesim OZTAS

COVID-19 Associated Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report

Pusem PATIR

Henoch Schönlein Purpura / Ig A Vasculitis in Children and Risk Factors for Renal Involvement

Selcan DEMİR, Müferret ERGÜVEN, Cengiz CANDAN, Pınar TURHAN

Incidental Detection of a Rare Coronary Anomaly During Catheter Ablation for Premature Ventricular Complexes: All in One Coronary Ostium

Yusuf Ziya ŞENER, Uğur CANBOLAT, Hikmet YORGUN, Kudret AYTEMİR, Tuncay HAZIROLAN

In-Silico Analysis of The Correlation Between PD-L1 and ProInflammatory Type Interleukins and The Distribution of Their Potential Primary Sources in KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Neşe ÜNVER

The Effectiveness of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in Patients With Undiagnosed Lung Cancer

Elif Yelda NİKSARLIOĞLU, Şule GÜL, Ayşe YETER

The Comparison of ISUP Grades Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy: The Incoherence and Related Factors

Bülent ÖZTÜRK, Erman CEYHAN, Burak YILMAZ

Ranking of Everyday Activities by Risk of Coronavirus in the Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Turkey

Ümit KARTOĞLU, Deniz NALA KURTUOĞLU, LEVENT EKER, Hamza ÖZDEMİR, Ayşe Nilüfer ÖZAYDIN

The Inflammatory Processes Driven by Gut Microbiota

Ayşe BURUŞ, Başak ÇELTİKÇİ, Yasemin AKSOY