Vesna Marija POTOCIC MATKOVIC, Miroslav SRDJAK, Ivana SALOPEK

ÖRMECİLİK EĞİTİMLERİNİN YAPISINA VE TEKNOLOJİSİNE YÖNELİK YENİ YAKLAŞIMLAR

Bu makale, örmecilik teknolojisini de kapsayan eğitimlerin müfredat programlarının modifikasyonunu tanmlamaktadır. Öğrencilerin bilgiyi yüzeysel olarak kabul ettikleri, öğrendikleri bilgileri çabuk unuttukları ve eğitimlerini zor olarak değerlendirdiklerine dikkat çekilmiştir. Öğrencilerin eğitimin ve öğretim ortamlarını modifiye etme yönünde çaba harcamaya karar verilmiştir. Öğrencilerin öğren- me tercihlerini belirlemek amacıyla VARK testi kullanılmıştır. Müfredat programları, bu testin sonuçlarına, dayandırılarak revize edil- miştir. ASSIST testi, öğrencilerin öğrenim görmeye karşı olan yaklaşımlarını benimsemelerini kontrol etmek amacı ile kullanılmıştır. Bu tür değişikliklerin iyi sonuçlar verebileceği ve gelecekte kullanılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Örme teknolojisi, Eğitim, VARk testi, ASSIST testi, Müfredat programı modifikasyonu

NEW APPROACHES TO STRUCTURE AND TECHNOLOGY OF KNITTING COURSES

This paper describes modification of curricula of the courses covering technology of knitting. It has been noticed that students accept knowledge superficially, forget the learned knowledge quickly, and consider these courses as difficult ones. It has been decided to make an effort to move towards students and modify teaching/learning environment. To perceive their learning preferences the VARK test has been used. Based on results of the test, as well as introduction of practical projects, and unification of previously separated exercises, a curriculum has been modified. ASSIST test has been used to check that students have adopted a deeper approach to studying. It has been concluded that these modifications can give good results and that they will be used in the future

Keywords:

Technology of knitting, Education, VARK test, ASSIST test, Curriculum modification,

PDF

___

1. Lisabon strategy, available at http://www.eu2004.ie (accessed 26 June 2006)
2. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 2005, Standards and Guidelines for Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, Helsinki.
3. Magee, C.L., 2004, “Needs and Possibilities for Engineering Education: One Industrial/Academic Perspective”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol: 20(3), pp: 341-352.
4. Devon, R. et al., 2004, “Integrated Design: What Knowledge Is of Most Worth in Engineering Design Education?”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol: 20 (3), pp: 424-432.
5. Middleton, H., 2005, “Creative Thinking, Values and Design and Technology Education”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol: 1(15), pp: 61-71.
6. Sayer, K.; and Wilson, J. and Challis, S., 2006, “Problem Based Learning in Constructed Textile Design”, The International Journal of Art and Design Education, Vol: 25(2), pp. 159-163.
7. Ellis, G.W. and Rudnitsky, A.N. and Scordilis, G.E., 2005, “Finding Meaning in the Classroom: Learner-Centred Approaches that Engage Students in Engineering”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol: 21(6), pp: 1148-1158.
8. Marton, F. and Säljö, R., 1976, “On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I Outcome and Process”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol: 46(1), pp: 4-11.
9. Biggs, J., 2003, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, The Society for Research in Higher Education, Open University Press, Berkshire.
10. Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K., 1999, Understanding Learning and Teaching, Society for Research in Higher Education, Open University Press, Berkshire.
11. Ramsden, P., 1992, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, London.
12. Multiple Intelligence Inventory available at http://www.ldrc.ca/projects/miinventory/mitest.html (accesed 09 Juni 2008).
13. Paragon Learning Style Inventory available at http://www.oswego.edu/plsi/plsi48a.htm (accessed 09 Juni 2008).
14. Learning Styles Questionnaire available at http://www.peterhoney.com/content/tools.html (accessed 09 Juni 2008).
15. Fleming, N.D., 1996, VARK, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
16. Tait, H. and Entwistle, N.J. and McCune, V., 1998, “ASSIST: a Reconcemptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory”, Improving Student Learning, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford, pp: 262-271.
17. Salopek, I.; Potočić Matković, V.M.; Vrljičak, Z.; Srdjak, M., 2006, “Design of Socks in the Past and Present”, Book of Proceedings of the 3 rd International Textile, Clothing and Design Conference “Magic World of Textiles”, 08-11th October 2006, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp: 893- 897.
18. Srdjak, M.; Potocic Matkovic, V.M.; Pavko Cuden, A., 2006, “Understanding a Designer Technologist Team Work”, Proceedings of 3rd International Textile, Clothing & Design Conference, 8-11 October 2006, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
19. Entwistle, N.J.; Ramsden, P., 1983, Understanding Student Learning, Croom Helm, London.
20. The VARK Questionnaire for younger people, available at http://student.mwcc.edu/VARK/questionnaire_y.asp (accessed 09 Juni 2008).