Fabric sound is comprised as fabric handle property such as fabric softness, stiffness and drape. As the previous studies were reviewed, it could be seen that, in general different sound generation systems were used in which the fabric was pulled in a constant velocity. In these measurement systems, a fabric sample was rubbed against the face of another fabric sample and the friction occurred face to face. However, in some actions, friction is not always face to face. There are several different movements (such as jogging) and friction types in which the physical properties such as friction, roughness, shear, and bending stiffness act important role on fabric sound. In order to imitate all these situations, “waving movement sound” was designed. In addition to this, “frictional movement sound” was also defined and used to compare waving movement sound with the common (caused by face to face friction) frictional sound. The aim of this study is to investigate the sound generation properties of the fabrics under the influence of different frictions and movements. For this purpose, three different commonly used woven fabrics and three military windcheater fabrics were used and “Level Pressure of Total Sound (LPT)” values of these were measured during “frictional movement” and “waving movement”. According to the results, since frictional movement created higher friction force, LPT values of the frictional movement was found higher than the LPT values of waving movement. Higher bending rigidity and higher kinetic friction coefficient (µ) values increase frictional sound. In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supply lower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.
Fabric sound is comprised asfabric handle property such as fabric softness, stiffness and drape. As theprevious studies were reviewed, it could be seen that, in general differentsound generation systems were used in which the fabric was pulled in a constantvelocity. In these measurement systems, a fabric sample was rubbed against theface of another fabric sample and the friction occurred face to face. However,in some actions, friction is not always face to face. There are severaldifferent movements (such as jogging) and friction types in which the physicalproperties such as friction, roughness, shear, and bending stiffness actimportant role on fabric sound. In order to imitate all these situations,“waving movement sound” was designed. In addition to this, “frictional movementsound” was also defined and used to compare waving movement sound with thecommon (caused by face to face friction) frictional sound. The aim of this study is toinvestigate the sound generation properties of the fabrics under the influenceof different frictions and movements. For this purpose, three differentcommonly used woven fabrics and three military windcheater fabrics were usedand “Level Pressure of Total Sound (LPT)” values of these were measured during“frictional movement” and “waving movement”. According to the results, sincefrictional movement created higher friction force, LPT values of the frictionalmovement was found higher than the LPT values of waving movement. Higherbending rigidity and higher kinetic friction coefficient (µ) values increasefrictional sound. In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supplylower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.
Kaynakça
1. Kim, C.; Yang, Y.; Cho, G. Characteristics of Sounds Generated from Vapor Permeable Water Repellent Fabrics by Low-speed Frictions, Fibers and Polymers, 2008, Vol.9, No.5, 639-645
2. Kim, C.; Cho, G.; Hong, K.A. Shim, H.J. Sound Characteristics According to Cross-Sectional Shapes of Fibers, Fibers and Polymers, 2003, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 199-203
3. Na, Y.; Cho, G.; Variations in Sensibility to Fabric Frictional Sound by Fiber Type and Subject, Textile Research Journal; 2003, 73; 837
4. Jin, E.; Cho, G. Effect of Frictional Sound of Combat Uniform Fabrics on Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Responses, Fibers and Polymers, 2013, Vol.14, No.3, 500-505
5. Yi, E.;Cho, G. Fabric-sound Classification by Autoregressive Parameters, Journal of the Textile Institute, 2000, 91: 4, 530 -545
6. Cho, J.; Cho,G., Determining the Psychoacoustic Parameters That Affect Subjective Sensation of Fabric Sounds at Given Sound Pressures, Textile Research Journal, 2007, 77; polypropylene. 29-37
7. McCullough, E.A. A Comparison of the Comfort and Hand Characteristics of Lining Fabrics, GAMA (Global Acetate Manufacturers Association) Technical Report # 99-08, 1999
8. Kim, C.; Cho, G.; Yoon, H.; Park, S. Characteristics of Rustling Sounds Created by the Structure of Polyester Warp Knitted Fabrics, Textile Research Journal, 2003, 73; pp.685 -691
9. Cho S and Cho G. Minimizing Frictional Sound of PU-Nanoweb and PTFE Film Laminated Vapor Permeable Water Repellent Fabrics. Fibers and Polymers 2012; Vol.13, No:1:123-129, DOI 10.1007/s12221-012-0123-y
10. Yang, Y., Kim, C., Park, J., You, H., Cho, G., Application of the Real Fabric Frictional Speeds to the Fabric Sound Analysis using Water Repellent Fabrics, Fibers and Polymers 2009, Vol.10, No.4, 557-561, DOI 10.1007/s12221-009-0557-z
11. Park C., Cho G., Analysis of Acoustic Characteristics of Fabrics in Terms of Mechanical Properties, Fibers and Polymers 2012; Vol.13, No: 3: 403-410.
11
12. Wang P-N, Ho M-H, Cheng K-B, Murray R, Lin Ch-H. Study on the Friction Sound Properties of Natural-Fiber Woven Fabrics, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2017; 25, 2(122): 34-42. DOI: 10.5604/12303666.1228183
13. http://www.deltaohm.com/ver2008/uk/depliant/hd2010UC_D_uk.pdf
14. Bishop, DP. Fabrics: Sensory and Mechanical Properties. Text. Prog. 1996, 26, 12-13, 41.
15. Giordano, B.L.; Avanzini, F. Chapter 4 Perception and Synthesis of Sound-Generating Materials, Springer-Verlag London 2014, M. Di Luca (ed.), Multisensory Softness, Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems, pp 49-84
16. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35h1.htm
17. Cho, G.; Casali, J.G.; Yi, E. Effect of Fabric Sound and Touch on Human Subjective Sensation, December, Fibers Polym. 2001, 2(4):196–202
18. Cho G.; Kim C.; Cho J.; Ha J. Physiological Signal Analyses of Frictional Sound by Structural Parameters of Warp Knitted Fabrics, Fibers Polym. 2005, March, 6(1):89– 94
19. http://www.textileweb.com/doc/pneumatic-fabric-stiffness-tester-0001
20. http://aeipro.com/files/congresos/2009badajoz/ciip09_1728_1836.2716.pdf
21. Saville, B.P., Physical Testing of Textiles, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge England, ISBN 0849305683, 1999, 310p.
22. Cooper, C.J., 2013, Acoustics and Friction of Apparel and Model Fabrics, and
Consumer Perceptions of Fabric Sounds, PhD Thesis, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Birmingham
