Childcare and Maternity Policy Brief

<!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; direction: ltr; line-height: 120%; text-align: left; widows: 2; orphans: 2 } a:link { color: #0000ff; so-language: zxx } --> Bu politika özeti çocuk bakımı ve annelik politikaları üzerine yazılmıştır. Çalışma; çocuk bakımı ve annelik politikalarının gerekçesinin açıklanmasıyla başlamaktadır. Türk hükümeti çocuk bakımı ve annelik politikalarını çoğunlukla doğurganlık oranını ve genç nüfusu korumayla ilişkili olarak oluşturmaktadır. Çalışan annelerin iş ve ev şartlarının iyilşetirilmesi nüfus planlaması gerekçesinden sonra gelmektedir. Daha detaylı incelemek amacıyla bu politikalar üç alt kategoriye bölünmüştür; izin politikaları, iş ortamı şartları, çocuk bakımı. Bu üç kategorinin neden bu politikanın konusu oldukları açıklanmıştır. İsviçre’nin mevcut yasal düzenlemeleri çocuk bakımı ve annelik politikalarına örnek olarak sunulmuştur. Sonraki kısımda Türkiye’nin mevcut yasal düzenleme ve uygulamaları ortaya konulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, mevcut politikaların yeniden düzenlenmesine yönelik önerilere yer verilmiştir.

Childcare and Maternity Policy Brief

<!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; direction: ltr; line-height: 120%; text-align: left; widows: 2; orphans: 2 } a:link { color: #0000ff; so-language: zxx } --> The present policy brief is about childcare and maternity. Study begins with explaining rationale of childcare and maternity policy. For the Turkish government this policy is mostly related with protection of fertility rates and young populace. Improving working mothers’ work and home conditions comes as a rationale after population planning aim. In order to examine in detail, policy is divided into three sub-categories; leave policy, workplace conditions, childcare. Three categories is examined and explained why they are the topic of the policy. Existing legislative context of Sweden is presented as an example of childcare and maternity policy. Then Turkish legislation is presented and current regulations and applications are revealed. As a result, essential new policy and regulation for existing policy suggested are included.

___

  • Ali, E. A. & Rattani, S. A. (2015). Effects of maternal employment on child’s emotional development. International Journal of Nursing Education, 7, 55-59.
  • Aycan, Z., & Eskin, M. (2005). Relative contributions of childcare, spousal support, and organizational support in reducing work-family conflict for men and women: The case of Turkey. Sex Roles, 53, 453-471.
  • Buehler, C., & O'Brien, M. (2011). Mothers' part-time employment: Associations with mother and family well-being. Journal Of Family Psychology, 25(6), 895-906.
  • Chang, Y. (2013). The Relation Between Mothers' Attitudes Toward Maternal Employment and Social Competence of 36-Month-Olds: The Roles of Maternal Psychological Well-Being and Sensitivity. Journal Of Child And Family Studies, 22(7), 987-999.
  • Coley, R. L., Lohman, B. J., Votruba-Drzal, E., Pittman, L. D., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2007). Maternal functioning, time and money: The world of work and welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 721–741.
  • European Union. (2012).“Promoting gender equality in working life” [Brochure]. Turkey, TR: EU Twinnig project.
  • European Union. Sweden:Successful reconciliation of work and family life. Retrieved December 26, 2015 from http://europa.eu/epic/countries/sweden/index_en.htm
  • Fahlén, S. (2012). Facets of work–life balance across Europe : How the interplay of institutional contexts, work arrangements and individual resources affect capabilities for having a family, and for being involved in family life. (Doctoral dissertation). Sweden: US-AB.
  • Fried, M. 1998. Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Haneef, S.M., Maqbool, S., & Arif, A.M., (2000) Textbook of paediatrics. Lahore: Pakistan Paediatric Association.
  • Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Johnson, K. L. (2000). “Part-time work for women: Does it really help balance work and family?’, Human Resource Management, 39(1), 17–32.
  • International Labour Organisation (ILO). (2005). Facts on Women at Work. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inf/download/women/pdf/ factsheet.pdf
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (2014). Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • Kimmel, J. (2001). The child care problem for low-income working families. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Retrieved from http://research.upjohn.org/reports/104
  • Ministry of Labor and Social Security & UNICEF, (2013). Child well-being in early years and women’s employment: Policy paper. Turkey.
  • Muller, C. (1995). Maternal employment, parental involvement, and mathematics achievement among adolescents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 85–100.
  • NTVMSNBC. (2008, March 10). Başbakan’dan kadınlara ‘3 çocuk’ mesajı (Message of ‘3 children’ from Prime Minister to women). Retrieved January 1, 2016 from the http://arsiv.ntv.com.tr/news/438418.asp
  • OECD. Family Data Base. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm
  • Official Sweden Website. Ten things that make Sweden family-friendly. Retrieved from https://sweden.se/society/10-things-that-make-sweden-family-friendly/
  • Redmond, J., Valiulis, M., Drew, E. (2006). Literature review on issues of work life balance, workplace culture and maternity/childcare issues. Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development. (2014). Tenth development plan (2014-2018). Turkey.
  • Resmi Gazete (2015, April 7). Bazi kanun ve kanun hükmünde kararnamelerde değişiklik yapilmasina dair kanun. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150407-19.htm
  • Sayıl, M., Güre, A., Uçanok, Z. ve Pungello, E. P. (2009). Çalışan ve ilk kez anne olan kadınların bebeklerinin bakımı ve işe geri dönme süreci: İleriye dönük çoklu etkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 64, 1-14.
  • Sida. (2015). Supporting women’s economic empowerment: scope for Sida’s engagement. Sweden.
  • Spiteri, G., & Xuereb, R. (2012). Going back to work after childbirth: women's lived experiences. Journal Of Reproductive And Infant Psychology, 30, 201-216.
  • Stratigaki, M. (2004). The cooptation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of “reconciliation of work of family”. Social Politics, 11, 30-56.
  • TARKI Social Research Institute & Applica. (2010). Child Poverty and Child Well-Being in the EU. Budapest.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK). (2013, March 8). İstatistiklerle kadın. Retrieved from TUİK Website: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=13458.
  • United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women (UN Women). (2010, November 9-11). Policy, practice and potential: Work-life integration in the United Nations system. Retrieved from United Nations Website: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/worklifeissues/EGM_Paper_on_Work_Life_Integration.pdf.
  • UNESCO. (2003). Consolidating Governmental Early Childhood Education and Care Services Under the Ministry of Education and Science: A Swedish Case Study. Early Childhood and Family Policy Series, 6.