Resistance as the Discourse of Docile Bodies in Plath\'s The Bell Jar

Michel Foucault Disiplin ve Ceza adlı kitabında, iktidar iliflkileri içinde bedenlerin en önemli odak noktası oldu¤unu ve iktidarın devamlılık sa¤layabilmek için bireysel bedenleri disiplin teknikleri kullana- rak belirli bir norma uyumlu hale getirdi¤ini anlatıyor. Foucault’ya göre gözetim ve kontrol, itaatkâr ve “faydalı” bedenler yaratmayı hedefleyen bu disipliner teknikler arasındadır. Okullarda, hastanelerde, aske- riyede, hapishane ve akıl hastanelerinde ve hatta evlerde uygulanan disiplin mekanizmalarının asıl amacı iktidarın kontrolünü içsellefltirmifl bedenler, etkin makineler yaratmaktır. Sylvia Plath’ın 1950’lerde yazdı- ¤ı fakat ancak 1963’te yayımlanan Sırça Fanus adlı kitabı Foucault’un bahsetti¤i itaatkar bedenlerin olu- flum sürecinin hikayesi olarak yorumlanabilir. Romanın bu biçimde yorumlanmasının bafllıca sebebi Plath’ın elefltirdi¤i savafl sonrası sistemin Foucault’un anlattı¤ı disipliner sistemle benzerlik göstermesidir; iki yazarın da üstünde durdu¤u nokta bu sistemin görünmez oldu¤u, bu sebeple kolay ifllemesi ve bu me- kanizmanın bir parçası olabilmek için belirli bir tür bilgiye ihtiyaç duyuluyor olmasıdır. Plath’ın romanı- nın asıl amacı bireyin bu disiplin mekanizması altında nasıl bo¤uldu¤unu göstermektir. Dolayısıyla bu ma- kale romanda bireyin sözü edilen iktidar iliflkilerini de¤ifltirme ve bu sistemle uzlaflma çabalarını, bu stra- tejinin sınırlılı¤ını gösterecektir

Resistance as the Discourse of Docile Bodies in Plath\'s The Bell Jar

In his book Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Michel Foucault argues that the bodyis the object and target in power relations, and the purpose is to discipline the body in order to ensure thecontinuity of society. Thus he suggests that individuals are under surveillance and regulations that are mostoften subtle, and that by means of those regulations modern institutions individuate bodies according todesignated tasks so as to create socially docile and profitable individuals. Therefore, disciplinary methodsthat are employed in schools, hospitals, armies, homes as well as prisons and mental institutions, are thetools of the collective forces aiming to “obtain an efficient machine”(164), through habituating the internalization of surveillance. Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar, published in 1963 but written during the late 1950s,lends itself to a Foucauldian analysis of bodies that enter into the machinery of power that ‘explores [thebody], breaks it down and rearranges it’ (Discipline and Punish 138). The reason for this inclination is thatthe postwar system that Plath critiques, like Foucault’s disciplinary institutions, also requires knowledgeof the system that is invisible. Plath’s novel revolves around this theoretical framework with the aim ofpresenting how an individual suffocates under the pressure of disciplining regulations. This article, thus,aims to present the novel as an examination of the ways in which an individual attempts to change thepower relations, negotiate with disciplining forces and the limitations of this strategy

___

  • Baldwin, Kate. “The Radical Imaginary of “The Bell Jar,”” A Forum on Fiction, 38/1 (Fall, 2004), pp.21-40.
  • Bayley, Sally. “‘I have your head on my wall’: Sylvia Plath and the Rhetoric of Cold War America,” European Journal of American Culture, 25/3 (2006), pp.155-171.
  • Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique, p.299.
  • Beauvoir, Simone De. The Second Sex (London: Vintage, 1997)
  • Bloom, Harold (ed.), Alienation (New York: Infobase, 2009)
  • Bonds, Diane S. “The Separative Self in Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar,” Women’s Studies, 18/1 (May, 1990), pp.49-64.
  • Bordo, Susan and Alison M. Jaggar (eds.), Gender and Body: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1990)
  • Boyer, Marilyn. “The Disabled Female Body as a Metaphor for Language in Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar,” Women’s Studies, 33/ 2 (2004), pp.199-223.
  • Bundzten, Lynda K. Plath’s Incarnations: Women and the Creative Process (Michigan: University of Miscigan Press, 1983)
  • Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble (New York and London: Routledge, 1999)
  • Coontz, Stephanie. The Way We Never Were: American Families and The Nostalgia Trap (NewYork: Basic Books, 1992)
  • Coyle, Susan. “Images of Madness and Retrieval: An Exploration of Metaphor in The Bell Jar,” Studies in American Fiction, 12 (1984), pp.161-74.
  • Evans, Mary. “Extending Autobiography: A Discussion of Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar,” in Feminism and Autobiography: Texts, Theories, Methods. Transformations (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 76-88.
  • Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique (New York: Dell, 1977)
  • Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (London: Routledge, 2003)
  • Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin, 1991)
  • Foucault, Michel. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (New York: The New Press, 1994)
  • Haris, Mason. “The Bell Jar,” in Linda W. Wagner (ed.), Critical Essays on Sylvia Plath (Boston: G. K. Hall & Company, 1984)
  • Leonard, M. Garry. “‘The Woman is Perfected. Her Dead Body Wears the Smile of Accomplishment’: Sylvia Plath and Mademoiselle Magazine,” College Literature, 19/2 (1992), pp. 60-82.
  • McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1998)
  • Perloff, Marjorie. “A Ritual for Being Born Twice: Sylvia Plath’s “The Bell Jar”,” Contemporary Literature, 13/4 (Autumn, 1972), pp.507-522.
  • Plath, Sylvia. The Bell Jar, (London: Faber and Faber, 1988)
  • Smith, J. Caroline. “‘The Feeding of Young Women’: Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar, Mademoiselle Magazine, and the Domestic Ideal,” College Literature, 37/4 (2010), pp.1-23.
  • Smith, Martin. “Metaphors for Mental Distress as an Aid to Empathy: Looking through The Bell Jar,” Journal of Social Work Practice (2011), pp. 1-12.
  • Wagner, Linda. “Plath’s The Bell Jar as Female Bildungsroman,” Women’s Studies, 12 (1989), pp.55-68.