A Conceptional Examination of Urban Poverty: Under–Class or Ghetto Poverty?

In this paper, the basic concepts commonly used in the discussions of urban poverty are briefly examined. As a result of this examination, the main aim of this study is to provide guidance to the general reader with no mastery of the literature of the concepts used in the analysis related to the problem of urban poverty; on the other hand, to provide introductory information for those researchers recently interested in the literature. It is because the arbitrary usage of some of the concepts related to poverty such as the interchangeable use of underclass and lower–class, similar to all other conceptualizations, invalidates the efforts trying to understand and explain them. Therefore, there certainly is a need to decide whether foreign concepts borrowed from different cultural contexts are usable to describe domestic facts and cases.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Conceptional, Examination, Urban

A Conceptional Examination of Urban Poverty: Under–Class or Ghetto Poverty?

Keywords:

Absolute Poverty, Relative Poverty, Social Exclusion Ghetto, Neighborhood, Poverty,

PDF

___

Atkinson, Rob & Simin Davoudi; “The Concept of Social Exclusion in the European Union: Context, Development and Possibilities”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2000, pp. 427–28.
Bauman, Zygmunt; Calisma, Tuketicilik ve Yeni Yoksullar [Work, Consumerism and the New Poor], Istanbul: Sarmal Yayinevi, February 1999. Brady, David; “Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty”, Social Forces, Vol. 81, No. 3, 2003, pp. 723–24.
Dahl, Espen, Fløtten, Tone & Thomas Lorentzen; “Poverty Dynamics and Social Exclusion: An Analysis of Norwegian Panel Data”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2008, pp. 232–34.
Duffy, Katherine; Social Exclusion and Human Dignity in Europe, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1995, p. 18.
Fainstein, Susan S., Gordon, Ian & Michael Harloe [eds.]; Divided Cities: New York & London in the Contemporary World [Studies in Urban and Social Change], London: Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
Hamnett, C.; “Social Segregation and Social Polarization”, Handbook of Urban Studies, ed. R. Paddison, London: Sage Publ., 2001.
Hoffman, Saul D. & Greg J. Duncan, “Teenage Underclass Behavior and Subsequent Poverty: Have The Rules Changed?”, The Urban Underclass, eds. Paul E. Peterson & Christopher Jencks, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1991, p. 166.
Insel, Ahmet; “Iki Yoksulluk Tanimi ve Bir Oneri” [Two Definitions of Poverty and One Suggestion], Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, No. 89, 2001, pp. 64–6.
Insel, Ahmet; “Yoksulluk, Dislanma ve STK’lar” [Poverty, Exclusion and NGOs], Sivil Toplum ve Demokrasi Konferans Yazilari–6, ed. Arzu Karamani, Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Sivil Toplum Kuruluslari Egitim ve Arastirma Birimi Yayinlari, 2005, p. 8.
Jargowsky, Paul A. & Mary Jo Bane; “Ghetto Poverty in the United States, 1970–1980”, The Urban Underclass, eds. Christopher Jencks & Paul E. Peterson, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1991, pp. 235–36.
Kanbur, Ravi & Diganta Mukherjee; “Poverty, Relative to the Ability to Eradicate It: An Index of Poverty Reduction Failure”, Economics Letters, No. 97, 2007, pp. 52–3.
Leonard, Madeleine; “The Long–Term Unemployed, Informal Economic Activity and the Underclass in Belfast: Rejecting or Reinstating the Work Ethic”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research [IJURR], Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998, p. 56.
Macours, Karen & Johan F.M. Swinnen; “Rural–Urban Poverty Differences in Transition Countries”, LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, Discussion Papers, No. 169, 2007, pp. 1–3.
Murray, Charles; Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980, USA: Basic Books, 1994.