Investigation of the lawsuits regarding Down syndrome
Objective: To examine the number of cases filed about Down syndrome in terms of its numbers, causes and consequences, to provide an overview of what doctors should pay attention to when informing and consulting patients and during follow-up and recommend solutions for decreasing the number of malpractice cases. (Discussing the legal aspect of the decisions is beyond the scope of this research.) Materials and Methods: ‘Down’, ‘Down sendromu’ ‘Down’s, ‘trizomi 21 ‘, ‘trisomi 21’ and ‘trisomy 21’ was written to ‘ https:// karararama.yargitay.gov.tr/ ‘ and ‘https://karararama.danistay.gov.tr/’ web addresses search engines and the data was examined with Microsoft Excel or with R version 4.0.5 ( 2021-03-31) for bias and frequency table was used and the results were examined. Results: A total of 53 cases were found. 49 supreme court and 4 Council of State court decisions are found. The cases are from 27.10.2009 to 13.10.2021. Conclusion: A total of 39 different Down syndrome cases were examined, as 6 of the 53 cases were related to the same cases and 8 of them were cases not related to Down syndrome. 28 cases are “doctor negligence”, 5 are “reckless killing”, 1 “material mixing in the genetic center”, 1 “unauthorized use of the child’s photo”, 1 “stealing money from the child”, 1 “intentionally injuring the child”, 1 ‘inheritance request for the child’ and 1 on ‘guardianship’.
___
- Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, et al. National estimates
and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in
the United States, 1999-2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol
Teratol 2006;76:747-56. doi:10.1002/bdra.20294
- Sherman SL, Allen EG, Bean LH, Freeman SB. Epidemiology
of Down syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev
2007;13:221-27. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20157
- Daunhauer LA, Fidler DJ, Hahn L, Will E, Lee NR, Hepburn
S. Profiles of everyday executive functioning in young
children with down syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil
2014;119:303-18. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.4.303
- Bull MJ. Down Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2344-52.
doi:10.1056/NEJMra1706537
- Morris JK, Mutton DE, Alberman E. Revised estimates of
the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s
syndrome. J Med Screen 2002;9:2-6. doi:10.1136/jms.9.1.2
- https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ Kategori/GetKategori?p=Saglik-ve-
Sosyal-Koruma-10. Accessed on 24.05.2022
- https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ #kanunlar Accessed on
24.05.2022
- Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R.
Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic
villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated
meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:442-51.
doi:10.1002/uog.20353
- O’Connor C, Moore R, McParland P, et al. The natural
history of trisomy 21: outcome data from a large tertiary
referral centre. Fetal Diagn Ther 2021;48:575-81.
doi:10.1159/000517729
- Çalış P, Bayram M. Techniques, complications and difficulties
of prenatal ınvasive diagnosis. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Genet-
Special Topics 2018;3:38-43
- https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Kadin_ve_
Ureme_Sagligi_Db/dokumanlar/rehbler/ dogum_oncesi_
bakim_08-01-2019_1.pdf Accessed on 21.05.2022
- Dolen I. How should a fetus with down syndrome be diagnosed
in prenatal care? Turk J Womens Health Neanotol 2021; 3: 39-
49. doi: 10.46969/ezh.839710
- Alberry MS, Aziz E, Ahmed SR, Abdel-Fattah S. Non invasive
prenatal testing (NIPT) for common aneuploidies and
beyond. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 258:424-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.008
- Huang T, Gibbons C, Rashid S, et al. Prenatal screening for
trisomy 21: a comparative performance and cost analysis of
different screening strategies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
2020;20:713. doi:10.1186/s12884.020.03394
- Dikmen U, Özbaş C, Özkan S. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Genet-
Special Topics. 2018;3:131-4.