Muhammet GUZELSOY, Ali Rıza TÜRKOĞLU, Serpil SANCAR, Soner COBAN, Dursun ÜNAL, MURAT ÖZTÜRK, Halil GÜZELSOY, HAKAN DEMİRCİ

Erkek sünnetinde kaygı, endişe ve korkuyu azaltmak için anestezi seçimi

Amaç: Lokal anestezi(LA) veya genel anestezi (GA) ile yapılan sünnet işleminin neden olduğu stresi yani kaygı, endişe ve korkuyu Venham resim testi (VPT) ve fasyal imaj skalası (FIS) ile değerlendirmek. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Ailesinden onam alınan 50 si ga, 40 i la ile sünnet yapılan 90 çocuk çalışmaya dahil edildi. Sünnet öncesi ve sonrasında tüm çocuklar VPT ve FIS testlerini doldurdu. İstatistiki analiz için SSPS 16 kullanıldı. Bulgular: Sünnet yapılan çocuklar LA alanlar ve GA alanlar olarak 2 gruba ayrıldılar. LA verilen çocukların yaş ortalaması 7,75±2,04(4- 12 yaş), GA verilen çocukların ise 7,28±1,4(4- 12 yaş) idi. İki grup arasında yaş farkı yoktu (p=0,233). VRT ile FIS korele idi. Lokal anestezi ile sünnet yapılan grupta FIS %57 ve VRT %22 arttı (sırasıyla p=0,0001 ve p=0,001). Genel anestezi ile yapılan sünnet grubunda ise FIS’teki artış %7, VPT deki artış %0,69 idi ve bu artışlar anlamlı değildi( sırasıyla; p=0,520, p=0,385). Sonuç: Sünnet işleminde uygulanan anestezi yönteminin çocukta oluşturacağı stres(korku, kaygı ve endişe) VPT ve FIS ile tespit edilebilmektedir. LA ile yapılan sünnetin GA ile yapılan sünnet işlemine göre VPT ve FIS değerlerini anlamlı olarak daha fazla yükselttiği için çocuklarda daha fazla strese neden olabileceği fikrine ulaştık. Bu nedenle anestezi süresinin uzunluğu ve GA’nin olası risklerine rağmen 4-12 yaş grubu çocuklarda daha az strese neden olacağı için GA tercih edilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

anestezi türü, sünnet, stres, VPT, FIS

Selection of anesthesia to reduce anxiety, worry and fear in male circumcision

Aim: To evaluate the stress created by the concern, anxiety and fear experienced during the circumcision procedure performed under local anesthesia(LA) or general anesthesia(GA) with the Venham picture test(VPT) and facial image scale(FIS). Method and Materials: We included in the study a total of 90 children who were circumcised, 50 under general anesthesia and 40 under local anesthesia, after consent was obtained from the family. All children completed the VPT and FIS tests before and after the circumcision. SSPS 16 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The children who were circumcised were divided into 2 as the LA and GA groups. The mean age was 7.75±2.04(4-12) years in the LA and 7.28±1.4(4-12) years in the GA group with no statistically significant difference (p=0.233). VPT results were found to be correlated with FIS results. FIS results increased 57% and VPT results 22% after the procedure in the LA group(p=0.0001 and p=0.001, respectively). This increase rate was 7% and 0.69% respectively in the GA group and these increases were not significant(p=0.520, p=0.385, respectively). Conclusion: The stress (fear, concern and anxiety) caused by the anesthesia method used during the circumcision procedure in the child can be detected using VPT and FIS. We concluded that circumcision performed with LA may cause more stress in children than with GA as the VPT and FIS values were significantly higher. GA should therefore be preferred in children aged 4-12 years as it will cause less stress, despite the anesthesia duration and the possible risks.

Keywords:

anesthesia type, circumcision, stress, VPT, FIS,

PDF

___

1. Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83suppl.1:1-12.
2. Dekkers W, Hoffer C, Wills JP. Scientific contribution, bodily integrity and male and female circumcision. Med Health Care Philos 2005; 8: 179-191.
3. Alanis MC, Lucidi RS. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world’s oldest and most controversial operation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004; 59:379-395.
4. Morris BJ. Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative fort the 21st century. Bioessays 2007;29:1147-1158.
5. Goldman R. The psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int. 1999 Jan;83 Suppl 1:93-102.
6. Klinberg G, Hwang CP. Children’s dental fear picture test 30 (CDFP): a projective test for the assessment of child dental fear. J Dent Child 1994; 61: 89-96.
7. Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Ped Dent 2002;12: 47-52.
8. McMurtry CM, Noel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ. Children’s fear during procedural pain: preliminary investigation of the Children’s Fear Scale. Healt Psychol 2011; 30:780-8.
9. Hardwick-Smith, Mastrobattista, Wallace, Ritchey, 1998 Hardwick-Smith S, Mastrobattista JM, Wallace PA, Ritchey ML: Ring block for neonatal circumcision. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:930-4.
10. Devine CJ, Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM. Surgery of the penis and urethra. Campell’s Urology, sixth edit 1992; p: 2957-3032.
11. Fear of Circumcision in Boys Considerably Vanishes within Ten Days of Procedure. Serpil Sancar, Hakan Demirci, Muhammet Guzelsoy, Soner Coban, Rustem Askin, Mehmet, Erdem Uzun, Ali Riza Turkoglu. Urol J 2016;13:2541-5.
12. Talbert, C.M., Kraybill, E.N. and Potter, H.D. Adrenal Cortical Response to Circumcision in the Neonate. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1976; 48: 208-210.
13. Gunnar, M.R., Fisch, R.O., Korsvik, S. and Donhowe, J.M. The Effects of Circumcision on Serum Cortisol and Behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1981; 6: 269-275.
14. Williamson, P.S. and Evans, N. Neonatal Cortisol Response to Circumcision with Anesthesia. Clinical Pediatrics 1986; 25: 412-5.
15. Tractenberg M. Psychoanalysis of circumcision. Male and female circumcision, medical, legal and ethical considerations in pediatric practice. 1999; Eds: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF. pp:209-14.
16. Denniston GC. An analysis of circumcision advocacy. Male and female circumcision, medical, legal and ethical considerations in pediatric practice. 1999; Eds: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF. pp:221-40.
17. Boyle GJ, Goldman R, Svoboda JS, Fernandez E. Male circumcision: pain, trauma and psychosexual sequelae J Health Psychol 2002;7:329-43.
18. Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, crosssectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:1367- 81.
19. Gregory J. Boyle, Circumcision of Infants and Children:Short-Term Trauma and Long-Term Psychose