Katarak hastalarında monofokal ve akomodatif göz içi lensi kullanımının karşılaştırılması
Comparison of monofocal and accommodating intraocular lenses in patients with cataract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the visual outcomes of monofocal and accommodating intraocular lenses in patients with cataract. Material and Method: 42 eyes of 26 patients with cataract were included in this retrospective study. 21 eyes of 13 patients (8 patien ts had bilateral, 5 patients had unilateral surgery) had WIOL-CF accommodating intraocular lens implantation and they classified as Group 1. Other 21 eyes of 13 patients (8 patients had bilateral, 5 patients had unilateral surgery) had Acriva monofocal intraocular lens and they classified as Group2. Follow-up time was 6 months for both groups. Distance and near vision results were compared between two groups. Also changes in corneal endothelial cell count and intraocular pressure were evaluated in each group. Results: At postoperative sixth month mean best- corrected visual acuity was 0.91±0.1 (range: 0.7 and 1) in Group 1 and 0.9±0.1 (range: 0.7 and 1) for Group2. Mean uncorrected near vision for Group1 was 1.52±1.03 (range: Jaeger1 and Jaeger4). Near visual acuity was statistically significantly better in Grup 1 against Grup 2. (p<0.05) After 6 months follow up time, there was no significant change in corneal endothelial cell count and intraocular eye pressure for both groups. Discussion: With WIOL-CF accommodating intraocular lens, successful distance vision results as Acriva monofocal intraocular lens can be achieved in patients with cataract. Additionally near vision can be obtainable
___
- 1. Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness–challenges for the 21st century. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:249–56.
- 2. Coşkun M, Anayol MA, Altıntaş AGK, Çakmak HB, Şimşek Ş. Katarakt sertliğinin fako parametreleri ve komplikasyon gelişimi üzerine etkileri. Glo-Kat 2006;1:279-83.
- 3. Minassian DC, Rosen P, Dart JK, Reidy A, Desai P, Sidhu M, et al. Extra capsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomized trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(7):822–9.
- 4. Mainster MA, Turner PL. Blue-blocking Intraocular Lenses: Myth or Reality?. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;147(1):8-10.
- 5. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H. All-distance visual acuity and contrast visual acuity in eyes with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with minimal added power. Ophthalmology 2009;116(3):401-8.
- 6. Mendicute J, Irigoyen C, Ruiz M Iarramendi I, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes- Mico R. Toric intraocular lens versus opposite clear corneal incisions to correct astigmatism in eyes having cataract surgery. Journal Cat&Ref 2009;35(3):451-8.
- 7. Henderson BA. Accommodating IOLs. Ophthalmology 2008;115 (10):1850-1.
- 8. Sergienko N. Evaluation of the Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Journal Cat & Ref 2008;34(1):8-9.
- 9. Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(12):2476-82.
- 10. Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M, Tsuji H, Marutani H, Hara Y, et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29(11):2069-72.
- 11. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ, Doane J, Fine IH, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens, results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(5): 812-25.
- 12. Mesçi C, Karakurt Y, Aydın N ve ark. Difraktif (Restor) ve refraktif (Rezoom) multifokal göz içi lenslerle katarakt ameliyatları sonrası görme fonksiyonlarının karşılaştırılması. Glo-Kat 2009;4(3):183-8.
- 13. Can İ. Presbiyopinin cerrah tedavisi ve multifokal göz içi lenslerinin yeri: Katarakt cerrahisinden refraktif göz içi lensi cerrahisine geçiş. Glo-Kat 2007;2(1):1-12.
- 14. Baikoff G, Matach G, Fontaine A, Ferraz C, Spera C. Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(7):1454-60.
- 15. Strenk SA, Semmlow JL, Strenk LM, Munoz P, Gronlund-Jacob, DeMarco JKJ. et al. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens; a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40: 1162-9.
- 16. Macsai MS, Silver LP, Fontes BM. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32(4):628-33
- 17. Marchini G, Mora P, Pedrotti E, Manzotti F, Aldigeri R, Gandolfi SA. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 2007;114(11): 2038-43.
- 18. Mesçi C, Erbil H, Sönmez A, Acar H. Katarakt operasyonu sonrası erken dönem akomodatif göz içi lenslerin monofokal göz içi lenslerle görme fonksiyonları yönünden karşılaştırılması. Glokom-Katarakt Oftalmoloji Dergisi 2007;2(1):47-50.
- 19. Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Opthalmology 2007;114(9):1679-84.