___

• Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness and growth. New York: Free Press.
• Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M. & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). ‘The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process’. Journal of Management, 29, 99–118.
• Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670-687.
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
• Bordia, P. & Blau, G. (2003) Moderating Effect of Allocentrism on the Pay Referent Comparison–Pay Level Satisfaction Relationship. Applied Psychology 52 (4), 499−514
• Dawley, D. D., Andrews, C. M., Bucklew, S. N. (2008). Mentoring, supervisor support, and perceived organizational support: what matters most? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 235-247.
• Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
• Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51.
• Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1026-1040.
• Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812-820.
• Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
• Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior, 9, 175-208. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Henaman, H. G. III., & Schwab, D. R. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurements. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129-141.
• Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R., & Rivero, J. C. (1989). Organizational characteristics as predictors of personnel practices. Personnel Psychology, 42, 727-736.
• Kuvaas, B. (2008) An Exploration of How the Employee-Organization Relationship Affects the Linkage Between Perception of Developmental Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies 45 (1), 1–25
• Lapierre, L., Hackett, D. R., Taggar, S. (2006) A Test of the Links between Family Interference with Work, Job Enrichment and Leader-Member Exchange, Applied Psychology 55 (4), 489–511
• Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 467-483
• Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
• Meyer, J. P. and Smith, C. A. (2000). ‘HRM practices and organizational commitment: test of a mediation model’. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 319–331
• Moideenkutty, U. G., Kumar R., Nalakath, A. (2001) Perceived Organisational Support as a Mediator of the Relationship of Perceived Situational Factors to Affective Organisational Commitment. Applied Psychology 50 (4) , 615–634
• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Employee commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.
• Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.
• Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P. and Barksdale, K. (2006). ‘Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 837–67.
• Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774-780.
• Snell, S. A., & Dean, J. W. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 467-504.
• Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L, Porter, L. W., & Hite, J. P. (1995). Choice of employee organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors. Research in personnel and human resource management, 13, 117-151.
• Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employeeorganization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089-1121.
• Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in personnel and human resources management, 18, 137-185.
• Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.
• Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111