___

• Albert, S. Ashforth, B.E. ve J.E. Dutton (2000) “Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges”, Academy of Management Journal, 25, Special Issue.
• Andrews, S. Basler, C.R. ve Coller, X. (1999) “Organizational structures, cultures and identities: overlaps and divergences”, Research in the Sociology of Organization içinde. Der: Andrews, S.B.ve Konke D. Greenwich , CT:JAI.
• Ashforth, B.E. (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity Based Perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael F. (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
• Cheney, G. (1983) “On The Various And Changing Meaning of Organizational Membership: A Field Study of Organizational Identification”, Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
• Cheney, G. ve Tompkins P.K. (1987) “Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment”, Central States Speech Journal, 38:1,1-15.
• Cherim S. (2002) “Influencing Organizational ıdentification During Major Change: A Communication based Perspective”, Human Relations, 55, 1117-1137.
• Disanza J.R. ve Bullis C. (1999) “Everybody Identifies with Smokey the Bear: Employee Responses to Newsletter Identification Inducements at the U.S. Forest Service”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:3, 347-399.
• Dukerich J.M., Golden, B. ve Shortell S.M. (2002) “Beauty Is In The Eye of The Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity and Image On Physician Cooperative Behavior”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47:3.
• Dutton, J., Dukerich, J.ve Harquail C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly,34, 239-263.
• Erickson, B. (1988) “The Relational Basis of Attitudes”. Social Structure: A Network Approach içinde. Der: Berkowitz, S. ve Wellman B. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Fiol, C.M. (1991) “Managing Culture as A Competitive Source: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17,191-211.
• Fiol, C.M. (2001) “Revisiting an Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 27, 691-699.
• Garmon, M. (2004) “The Relationship Between Organizational Learning, CultureImage, Identity and Identification, An Empirical Study” Touro University International College of Business Administration, Cypress, California.
• Gioia D.A. ve Thomas J.B. (1996) “Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense making during strategic change in academia”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 370-403.
• Haslam, S.A., Eggins R.A. ve Reynolds K.J. (2003) “The ASPIRe Model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to Enhance Organizational Outcomes, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76:1.
• Hatch, M. ve Schultz M. (2002) “The Dynamics Of Organizational Identity”, Human Relations, 55:8, 989-1005.
• Kramer, R.M., Brewer M.B. ve Hanna B. (1996) “Collective Trust and Collective Action in Organizations: The Decision to Trust As a Social Decision.” Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research içinde. Der: Kramer, M.R. ve Tyler R.T. Sage Publications, London.
• Kreiner, G.E. ve Ashforth B.E. (2004) “Evidence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:1.
• Kuhn, T ve Nelson N. (2002) “Reengineering Identity: A Case Atudy of Multiplicity and Duality in Organizational Identification”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:1, 5-38.
• Larson, G.S. ve Pepper, G.L. (2003) “Strategies for Managing Multiple Organizational Identifications”, Management Communication Quarterly, 16:4, 528-557.
• Liponnen, J. Helkama, K. Olkkonen M.E. ve diğerleri (2005) “Predicting The Different Profiles of Organizational Identification: A Case of Shipyard Subcontractors”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 97-112.
• Mael, F. ve Ashforth B. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior Vol 13;103-123.
• Pfeffer, J.(1981) “Management as Symbolic Action: Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms”, Research in Organizational Behavior, içinde. Der: Cummings L.L. ve Staw B.M., 7, 1-52.
• Pratt M.G. (2000) “The Good and the Bad, and the Ambivalent”: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45:3, 456-493.
• Pratt, M.G. (1998) “To be or not to be”: Centarl Question in Organizational Identification” Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversatio içinde. Der:. Whetten D.A ve Godfrey P.C. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Ravasi, D. ve Van Rekom J. (2003) “Key Issues In Organizational Identity and Identification Theory”, Corporate Reputation Review, 6:2, 118-132.
• Russo T.C. (1998) “Organizational and professional Identification: A Case of Newspaper Journalist”, Management Communication Quarterly, 12:1, 72-111.
• Sass, J.S. ve Canary, J.D. (1991) “Organizational Commitment and Identification: An Examination of Conceptual and Operational Convergence”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 275-293.
• Scott C. R. (1997) “Identification with Multiple Targets in a Geographically Dispersed Organization”, Management Communication Quarterly, 10:4, 491-522.
• Scott, C R. Corman, S.R. ve Cheney, G. (1998) “Development of Strucurational Model of Identification in the Organization” Communication Theory,8:3, 298-336.
• Scott, S.G. ve Lane, V.R. (2000) “A stakeholder approach to Organizational identity”, Academy of Management Review,25 :1 ,43-62.
• Shamir, B (1990) “Calculations, values and Identities: The Sources of Collectivist Work Motivation”, Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
• Simon, B. ve Brown, R.J. (1987) “Perceived Intragroup Homogenity in Minority-majority Contexts”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
• Smitdhs, A. Pryun, A. ve. Van Riel C.B.M (2001) “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige On Organizational Identification”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5, 1051-1062.
• Sproull, L. ve Kiesler S. (1986) “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mailing Organizational Commitment” Management Science, 32:1492-1512. Tajfel, H. (1978) Differentiation between Social Groups. Study In Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
• Tajfel, H. (1982) “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
• Tajfel, H. ve Turner J.C. (1985) “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior”. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde Der: Worchel, S.ve Austin, W.G.2, 7-24, Chicago: Nelson Hall.
• Tompkins, P.K. ve Cheney G. (1985) “Communication and Unobtrusive Control inContemporary Organizations” Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions içinde. Der: McPhee, R.D.ve. Tompkins, P.K.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 179-210.
• Van Dick, R. Wagner, U. Stellmacher, J. ve diğerleri (2004) “The Utility of A Broader Conceptualization Organizational Identification: Which Aspect Really Matter?”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77:171-191. Van Dick, R. Wagner
• U.Stellmacher J. ve diğerleri (2005) “Category Salience and Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78:273-285.
• Van Knippenberg, D. ve Van Schie E.C.M. (2000) “Foci correlates of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
• Wiesenfeld, B.M. Raghuram, S ve Garud R. (1998) “Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization” Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 3:4.