Batıda Mezhepler Tarihi Metodolojisi Çalışmaları: Keith Lewinstein Örneği

___

  • Allard, M., Le Probléme des attributes divins dans la doctrine d’al-Ash’ari et de ses premiers grands disciples, Beirut 1965.
  • el-Bağdadi, Ebu Mansur Abdulkahir, Kitabu’l-fark beyne’l-fırak, Kahire 1910.
  • el-Bağdadi, Kitabu’l-fark beyne’l-fırak, İng. terc. A. S. Haklin, Moslem Shismes and Sectes, Part II, Tel Aviv 1935.
  • el-Eş’ari, Ebu’l-Hasen Ali b. İsmail, Makalatü’l-İslamiyyin, nşr. H. Ritter İstanbul 1931.
  • Goldziher, I., “Le denombrement de la sectes Mohametanes”, (Müslüman mezheplerin sayımı) Revue de l’histoire des religions, 26 (1892).
  • Ibn Hazm, Ebu Muhammed Ali Ahmed, el-Fasl fi’l-milel. Kahire 1317-21.
  • İsferaini, Ebu’l- Muzaffer, et-Tebsır fi’d-din, Kahire 1359/1940.
  • Juynboll, G. H. A., “Isnad Analysis: Some New Methods of Determining When, Where and How Isnads Came into Being. The Sataftariqu Tardition under a Magnifying Glass.” Yayınlanmamış tebliğ. From Jahiliyya to Islam Kolokyumu, Hebrew Uni- versity, Haziran 30 – Temmuz 7, 1985.
  • Kalhati, Ebu Said Muhammed b. Sa’id, Kitabuu’l-keşf ve’l-beyan, British Museum Or. 2606.
  • Kirmani, Ebu’l-Kasım, Şerhu kavl Rasulillah, (Dedering, “Ein Kommenter uber die 73 secten”, Le Monde Oriental, 24 1930.içinde)
  • Kutlu, Sönmez, “İslam Mezhepleri Tarihinde Usul Sorunu”, İslami İlimlerde Metodoloji (Usul) Mes’elesi, I, İstanbul: İSAV (27-28 Eylül 2003). / İstanbul 2005, ss. 391- 440.
  • Laoust, H., “L’Heresiographie musulmane sous les Abbasides”, (Abbasiler Döneminde Müslüman Mezhepler Tarihçiliği) Cahiers de civilization medievalé, 10 (1967) “La classification des sectes dans le Farq d’al-Baghdadi” (Bağdadi’nin el- Farq’ında Mezheplerin Tasnifi). Lewinstein, Keith,
  • ------- “Studies in ıslamic Heresiography: the Khawarij in two firaq traditions”, Prince- ton University 1989, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
  • ------ “Notes on Eastern Hanafite Heresiography”, “Notes on Eastern Hanafite Heresi- ography”1 Journal of the American Oriental Society 114.4. (1994).
  • ------ “Azariqa in Islamic Heresiography”, Bulletin of the School of the Oriental and African Studies 54 81991), s. 251-68.
  • ------ “Making and unmaking a Sect: The Heresiographers and the Sufriyya”, Studica Islamica 76 (1992), s. 75-96.
  • Makdisi, G., “Ash’ari and the Ash’arites in Islamic Religious History”, Studia Islamica 17, (1962), ve 18, (1963).
  • Malati, Ebu’l-Huseyn, Kitabü’t-tenbih ve’r-redd ala ehli’l-ehva ve’l-bida. thk. S. Dedering İstanbul 1936.
  • Nesefi, Ebu Muti Mekhul b. Fadl, Kitabu’r-redd ala Ehli’l-bida, nşr. M. Bernand, Nanna- les Islamologques, 16 (1980).
  • Pezdevi, Abu’l-Yüsr, Usulü’d-din, nşr. H. Linss, Kahire 1383/1963.
  • Şehristani, Muhammed b. Abdülkerim, Kitabü’l-milel ve’n-nihal, Kahire 1968.
  • Ritter, H., “Philologika III: Muhammedanische Haresiographen”, Der Islam, 1929.
  • Sourdel, D., “La Classification des sectes Islamique dans le Kitab al-milal d’al- Shahras- tani” (Şehristani’nin el-Milel’inde Mezheplerin Tasnifi) Studia Islamica 3 (1970).
  • Strothmann, R., “On the history of Islamic Heresiography”, (İslam Mezhepler Tarihçili- ğinin Tarihine Dair) Islamic Culture 12 (1938)
  • W. Madelung, “Bermerkungen zur Imamitischen Firaq-literatur”, Der Islam 42 (1967)
  • “Fruhe Mu’tezilitische heresiographie: das Kitabu’l-usul des Ja’far b. Harb”, Der Islam, 57, 1980.
  • W. M. Watt, “The significance of the Sectes in Islamic Theology”, (, Actas do IV Cong- resso de Etudos Arabes e Islamicos 1968, Leiden 1971. ss. 169-173.
  • van Ess, J. Fruhe Mutaziliteische Heresiographie: Zwei Werke des naşi el-Ekber, Beyrut 1971.