Kaygı, Kararsızlık ve Yüceltme: Ontolojik Güven(siz)lik ve Dünya Risk Toplumu

Bu makale, Beck, Kristeva, Butler ve Zizek tarafından ele alınan paralel kaygıları araştırarak, ontolojik güven(siz) liğe ilişkin sosyo-teorik ve psikanalitik araştırma kapsamını genişletmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunlar, ilk olarak, ötekileştirme süreçlerinin psişik köklerini ve bunların kültürel dağarcıklara kodlanmasını içermektedir. İkincisi, ulusal ve uluslararası siyasette ötekileştirme süreçlerinin yerinden edilmesinin zorlukları ve olanaklarıdır. Üçüncüsü, küreselleşme süreçlerinin kültürlerin sembolik yeterliliği ve ontolojik güvensizliğe karşı kodlanmış savunmaları üzerindeki yıkıcı etkileridir. Dördüncüsü ise, kültürel dağarcıklarda ağırlık kazanan ontolojik güvensizliğe karşı bu savunmaların niteliksel özelliklerinin ve değişken tanınma normlarının siyasi ve uluslararası ilişkiler için hayati önemidir. Benzer şekilde, yerleşik normlara meydan okuyan ve kültürel dağarcıkları başarılı bir şekilde yeniden organize eden tanıma normlarının önemidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Psikanaliz, Anarşi Kültürü, Sembolik Yeterlilik, Tanınma Normları, Ötekileştirme Süreçleri

Anxiety, Ambivalence and Sublimation: Ontological In/security and the World Risk Society

This article aims to expand the social-theoretical and psychoanalytic range of research on ontological in/ security, by exploring parallel concerns addressed by Beck, Kristeva, Butler and Zizek. These include, first, the psychic roots of othering processes and their encoding into cultural repertoires. Second, the difficulties and possibilities of displacing othering processes within national and international politics. Third, the disruptive effects of globalising processes on the symbolic efficiency of cultures and on their encoded defences against ontological insecurity. Fourth, the crucial significance for political and international relations of the qualitative characteristics of those defences against ontological insecurity that gain predominance within cultural repertoires and their variable norms of recognition. Likewise, the significance of those norms of recognition that challenge established norms and successfully reorganise cultural repertoires.

Keywords:

Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anarchy, Symbolic Efficiency, Norms of Recognition, Othering Processes,

PDF

___

Beck, Ulrich (1997). “The Art of Doubt”, The Reinvention of Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich (2016). The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Beckett, Samuel (1956). Waiting for Godot. London, Faber & Faber.
Berenskötter, Felix and Nicola Nymalm, (2021). “States of Ambivalence: Recovering the Concept of ‘the Stranger’ in International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 47, No 1, p. 19-38.
Brown, Wendy (2010). Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York, Zone Books.
Butler, Judith (2004). Precarious Life. London & New York, Verso.
Butler, Judith (2015). Senses of the Subject. New York, Fordham University Press.
Cash, John (2009). “Waiting for Sociality: The (Re)birth, Astride a Grave, of the Social”, Ghassan Hage (ed.), Waiting. Carlton, Melbourne University Press.
Cash, John (2011). “Sublime Intensity: In the Realm of Sublimation”, Ghassan Hage and Emma Kowal (eds.), Force, Movement, Intensity. Carlton, Melbourne University Press.
Cash, John (2016). “To Dwell in Ambivalence: On the Promise and Dilemmas of Beck’s ‘the Art of Doubt’”, Anthony Elliott and Eric L. Hsu (eds.), The Consequences of Global Disasters. London & New York, Routledge.
Cash, John (2017). “The Dilemmas of Ontological Insecurity in a Postcolonising Northern Ireland”, Postcolonial Studies, Vol. 20, No 3, p. 387-410.
Cash, John (2020). “Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anarchy, and Ontological Insecurity”, International Theory, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 306–321.
Delcker, Janosch (2016). “The Phrase that Haunts Angela Merkel”, https://www.politico.eu/article/the-phrase-thathaunts-angela-merkel/ (Accessed 20 October 2021).
Enten, Harry (2021). “Polls Show Majority of Republicans Mistakenly Think the 2020 Election wasn’t Legitimate”, https:// edition.cnn.com/2021/04/11/politics/voting-restrictions-analysis/index.html (Accessed 31 May 2021).
Giddens, Anthony (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Kinnvall, Catarina (2004). “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security”, Political Psychology, Vol. 25, No 5, p. 741–767.
Kinnvall, Catarina, Ian Manners and Jennifer Mitzen (2018). “Introduction: Ontological (In)security in the European Union”, European Security, Vol. 27, No 3, p. 249-265.
Klein, Melanie (1948). Contributions to Psycho-Analysis, 1921-1945. London, Hogarth Press.
Kristeva, Julia (1991). Strangers to Ourselves. New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Kristeva, Julia (1993). Nations without Nationalism. New York, Columbia University Press.
Krolikowski, Alana (2008) “State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 2, No 1, p. 109–133.
Laing, Ronald (1965). The Divided Self. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1949). “L’efficacité symbolique.” Revue de l’histoire des religions, Vol. 135, No 1, p. 5-27.
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006). “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 12, No 3, p. 341–370.
Mitzen, Jennifer (2018). “Feeling at Home in Europe: Migration, Ontological Security, and the Political Psychology of EU Bordering”, Political Psychology, Vol. 39, No 6, p. 1373–1387.
Rumelili, Bahar (2016). “Ontological (In)securities and Peace Anxieties”, Bahar Rumelili (ed.), Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties. London & New York, Routledge.
Steele, Brent (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations. New York, Routledge.
Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Zizek, Slavoj (1999) The Ticklish Subject. London & New York, Verso.