Avrupa tutuklama müzekkeresinde özgürlük ve güvenlik arasındaki denge

Mahkeme kararlarının karşılıklı tanınması çerçevesinde Avrupa Tutuklama Müzekkeresi en önemli cezai adli işbirliği enstrümanlarından diridir. Avrupa Tutuklama Müzekkeresi AB çapında belirli seviyede mevzuat uyumunun bulunduğu varsayımına dayanmaktadır. Bu varsayım da üye ülke hukuk sistemlerinde belirli seviyede bireylerin temel hak ve özgürlüklerinin güvence alınmasına ve çifte suçluluk gerekliliğinin kaldırılmış olmasına ve böylelikle karşılıklı güven unsurunun sağlanmış olduğu düşüncesi üzerine bina edilmektedir. Avrupa Tutuklama Müzekkeresinin oluşturulması ile bu hususlar karşılıklı tanıma ilkesinin uygulanması bakımından en tartışmalı yönleri teşkil etmiştir.

Within the framework öf the mutual recognition (the free movement1 of prosecutions and judgments), the European Arrest Warrant ('EAW') is the most striking instrument of judicial criminal cooperation. The EAW is based on the assumption that certain level of harmonization exist across the EU, which depends on underpinnings of (mutual trust) sufficient level of protection for rights of individuals and abolition of further border checks (abolition of dual criminality). With the establishment of the EAW, these two issues have constituted the most controversial aspects of the EAW for implementation of principle of mutual recognition.

___

Alegre, S., and Leaf, M., 'Criminal Law and Fundamental Rights in the EU: Moving Towards Closer Co-operation', 8 European Human Rights Law Review, 2003.

Allegre, S., and Leaf, M., 'Mutual Recognition and Judicial Cooperation: A Step Too Far Too Soon? Case Study-European Arrest Warrant,' European Law lournal 10(2), 2004

Ang, L., 'Procedural Rules', in in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the

European Arrest "Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004) Apap, J., and Carrera, S., 'European Arrest Warrant: Good Testing for Mutual Recognition in the Enlarged Europe', CEPS Policy Brief No. 46, (2004), s.6, s. http://www.ceps.be/ (Erişim Tarihi: 24.8.2006)

Asp, P., 'Mutual Recognition and the Development of Criminal Law Cooperation within the EU,' içinde Strandbakken, A., Harmonization of Criminal Law in European Union, (Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia Publishing, 2005)

Brady, H., and Roma, M., 'Let Justice be done: Punishing crime in the EU', policy brief London: Center for European Reform, at.2; at http:www.cer.org.uk, (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mart 2008).

Bem, K., 'The European Arrest Warrant and the Polish Constitutional Court Decision of 27 April 2005', in in Guild, E., Constitutional Challenges to the European Arrest Warrant, (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publisher, 2006)

Cherif Bassiouni, M., International Extradition: United States Law and Practice, 4th edition (New York: Oxford University Pres, 2002)

De Groot, S., 'Mutual Trust in European Extradition Law', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant', (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Eurojust Yıllık Raporu ve Avrupa Parlamentosunun Konseye Tavsiyesi 15 Mar 2006 (P6 TA-PROV (2006) 0083)

Feller, S.Z., 'The Scope of Reciprocity in Extradition', 10 Israel Law Review, 1975

Fletcher, M., Lööf, R., and Gilmore, Bill., EU Criminal Law and lustice, (USA:Edward Elgar, 2008)

Gbandi, K., 'EU Committee, House of Lords, In a Memorandum to the UK House of Lord inquiry, 'Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings' (Stationary Office; HL Paper; 28), 2 July 2005

Garlick, P., 'The European Arrest Warrant and the ECHR,' in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Gartner, I., 'Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the 'Principle ne bis in idem', Austrian National Report Revue Internationale de Droit Penale, 2004, s.13, www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php? (Erişim Tarihi: 17-Ocak 2008).

Geyer, F., 'The European Arrest Warrant in Germany: Constitutional Mistrust towards the Concept of Mutual Trust', in Guild, E., Constitutional Challenges to the European Arrest Warrant, (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publisher, 2006)

Kaunert, C., 'The Area of Freedom Security and Justice: Construction of A European Public Order', European Security 14(4), 2005

Keijzer, N., 'Extradition and Human Rights: A Dutch Perspective', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Keizer, N., 'Double Criminality Requirement', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Klip, A., and Van der Wilt, H., 'Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the Principle 'Ne Bis in Idem', Reports for the Netherlands Revue International de Droit Penal, 2004, s.45 www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php? (Erişim Tarihi: 17-Ocak 2008)

Krapac, D., 'Verdict in Absentia', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004).

Lagondy, O., 'Extradition without a Granting Procedure: The Concept of Surrender', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest "Warrant, (The Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Molders, S., The European Arrest Warrant and German Constitutional Court, German Law Journal, Vol. 7 No:1, 2006, 2006

Monar, J., 'Maintaining the Justice and Homeaffairs in an Enlarged Europe', in Apap, J., Justice and Home Affairs in the EU, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004)

Nilsson, H.G., Mutual Trust and Mutual Recognition of our Differences, içinde Gilles Kerchove and Anne Weyembergh, (eds) La reconnaissance mutuelle des decisions judiciaries dans lUnion europeenne, (Brüksel: Editions de l'Universite de Bruxelles: 2001)

Plachta, M., 'The Role of Double Criminality in International Cooperation in Penal Matters', in Jareborg, N., (eds), Double Criminality, Studies in International Law, (Uppsala: Lustus Förlag, 1989)

Plachta, M., 'European Arrest Warrant: Revolution in Extradition?, European Jornal of Ccrime, VI1 (2003)

Plachta, M., and van Ballegooji, W., 'The Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and Surrender Procedures between Member States of the European Union', in Blekxtoon, R., and van Ballegooji, W., Handbook on the Arrest Warrant, (The Hague: Asser Press , 2005).

Peers, S., EU Justice and Home Affairs Law, (Londra, Oxford University Press, 2nd Edition, 2006)

Peers, S., 'Mutual Recognition and Criminal Law in the European Union: Has the Council Got It Wrong,' 41 Common Market Law Review, 2004

Perignon, I., and Dauce, C., Perignon, I., and Dauce, C., 'The European Arrest Warrant: A Growing Success Strory', Era Forum 8, 2007

Pyle, C., Extradition, Politics, and Human Rights, Philadeiphia,: (Temple University Press, 2001)

Rezek, J.F. , 'Reciprocity as a Basis of Extradition', in 51 Yearbook of Jnternational Law, 1981

Schomburg, W., 'Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the 'Principle ne bis in idem', 2004, Reprot for Germany Revue Jnternationale de Droit Penale, s.7. www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php? (Erişim Tarihi: 17-Ocak 2008)

Van den Wyngaert, C., 'Double Criminality as a requirement to extradition', içinde Jareborg, N., (eds), Double Criminality, Studies in International Law, (Uppsala: Lustus Förlag, 1989)

Van der Wilt, H., 'The European Arrest Warrant and the Principle Ne Bis In Idem', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Van der Wilt, H., 'The Principle of Reciprocity', in Blekxtoon, R., and Van Balleji, W., Handbook on the European Arrest 'Warrant, (the Hague: Asser Press, 2004)

Vander Beken, T., Vermeulen, G., Steverlynck S., and Thomas, S., Finding the Best Place for Prosecution-, European Study on jurisdiction criteria, (Maklu: Antwerp/Apeldoorn, 2002)

Vander Beken, T., Vermeulen, G., and Ongena, T., 'Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the 'Principle ne bis in idem'in Belgium', Revue Internationale de Droit Penale, 2004,s.3. www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php? (Erişim Tarihi: 17-Ocak 2008)

Van den Wyngaert, C., and Stessens, G., 'The International non bis in idem principle: resolving some of the unanswered questions', International and Comparative Law Quarterly, V 48 1999

Vogel, J., 'Why is the Harmonisation of Penal Law necessary,' içinde Klip, A., and Wilt, H., Harmonisation and Harmonisation Measure in Criminal Law, Proceedings in colloquium, (Amsterdam: Royal Academi of Science 13-14 December 2001), s.9, http:www.knawl.nl (Erişim Tarihi 12 February 2006).

Wouters, J., and Naert, F., 'Of Arrest Warrant, Terrorist Offences and Extradition Deals. An Appraisal of the EU's Main Criminal Law Measures against Terrorism after ' 11September', 41 Common Market Law Review, 2004