Öğretmen Adaylarının Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitimine Yönelik Tutumları

Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler, eğitim sürecinde yeterli desteği buldukları zaman, toplumların gelişiminde etkin olma potansiyeline sahiplerdir. Bu nedenle üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi için uygun koşulların oluşturulmasında öğretmen yönlendirmesi gerekmektedir. Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin potansiyellerinin ortaya çıkarılmasında, öğretmenlerin üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimine yönelik olumlu duyuşsal özellikler taşıması önemli faktörlerden biridir. Bu araştırmada, öğretmen adaylarının üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimine ilişkin tutumlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tarama modelindeki araştırmanın katılımcıları, Marmara Bölgesi'nde bulunan üç devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültelerinde çeşitli bölümlerde son sınıfa devam eden öğrencilerdir (N=449). Veri toplama aracı olarak Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimine İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler, SPSS ile analiz edilmiş, normallik testinin ardından çalışmada ele alınan bağımsız değişkenler doğrultusunda Mann-Whitney U testi uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada, öğretmen adaylarının üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimine ilişkin tutumlarının orta düzeyde olumlu ve olumlu aralığı arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kız öğretmen adaylarının erkek öğretmen adaylarından daha olumlu tutuma sahip olduğu, üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimiyle ilgili kitap okuyan, üstün yetenekli olarak tanılanmış birini tanıdığını ifade eden katılımcıların tutumlarının daha olumlu olduğu diğer bulgulardır

Teacher Candidates’ Attitudes towards Education of Gifted Students

Gifted students, when adequately supported during their education process, have the potential to be influential in the development of societies. Therefore, teachers’ guidance is essential to ensure the appropriate conditions for the education of the gifted. In revealing the potential of the gifted students and ensuring appropriate guidance, it is important to raise awareness among pre-service and in-service teachers. This would help promote positive attitudes towards the provision of differentiated education to gifted students and gifted students. The aim of this study is to analyse the attitudes of prospective teachers towards the education of gifted students. The participants of this survey study are senior students studying in various departments at the Faculty of Education at three state universities located in the Marmara Region in Turkey (N=449). Data were collected with the Attitude Scale for the Education of the Gifted. The data were analysed through SPSS and, following the normality test, Mann-Whitney U test was done in accordance with the independent variables of the study. The results showed that the attitudes of the prospective teachers towards the education of gifted students fall within the upper limit of the moderately positive range and the lower limit of the positive range. In addition, the attitudes of the female prospective teachers were more positive than that of the male prospective teachers. Finally, the attitudes of the participants who reported having acquaintances diagnosed as gifted and read books on the education of the gifted were more positive

___

  • Akarsu, F. (2004). Enderun: Üstün yetenekliler için saray okulu. 1. Türkiye üstün yetenekli çocuklar kongresi seçilmiş makaleler kitabı (ss. 97-101). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
  • Allodi, W. & Rydelius, P-A. (2008). The needs of gifted children in context: a study of Swedish teachers’ knowledge and attitudes. Paper presented at the ECHA conference Prague, Czechoslovakia /online/. Retrieved on 8th December 2012 from http://www.academia.edu/
  • Al–Makhalid, K. A. (2012). Primary teachers attitudes and knowledge regarding gifted pupils and their education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK /online/. Retrieved on 4th January 2013 from https://www.escholar. manchester.ac.uk/
  • Ashry, F. R. (2009). General education pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion in Egypt. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Florida, United States. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database.
  • Bangel, N., Enersen, D., Capobianco, B., & Moon, S. M. (2006). Professional development of preservice teachers: Teaching in the Super Saturday Program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 339-361.
  • Bégin, J. & Gagné, F. (1994). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and blueprints for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 161–179.
  • Bohner, G. & Wänke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
  • Carman, C. A. (2011). Stereotypes of giftedness in current and future educators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 790-812.
  • Carrington, N. G. & Bailey, S. B. (1999). How do preservice teachers view gifted students? Evidence from a NSW Study. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 9, 18-22.
  • Cashion, M. & Sullenger, K. (2000). ‘Contact us next year’: Tracing teachers’ use of gifted practices. Roeper Review, 23 (1), 18-21.
  • Chan, D. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong Teacher Perspective. Roeper Review, 23(4), 197-202.
  • Chessman, A. M. (2010). Teacher attitudes and effective teaching practices for gifted students at stage 6 (Doctoral dissertation /online Retrieved from) http://gradworks.umi.com/33/08/3308106.html on 23rd August 2016.
  • Chipego, A. (2004). Factors associated with the attitudes of elementary level classroom teachers toward gifted education (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Widener University UMI No. 3120729 on 23rd August2016.
  • Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Clinkenbeard, P. R. & Kollhoff, P. B. (2001). Ten suggestions for including gifted education in preservice teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 36(3), 214-216.
  • Colangelo, N. & Davis, G. A. (2003). Introduction and overview. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-10). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Cross, J. R., Cross, T. & Frazier, A. D. (2013). Student and teacher attitudes toward giftedness in a two laboratory school environment: A case for conducting a needs assessment, NALS Journal, 5(1), 1-22.
  • Curtis, J. (2005). Preservıce teachers’ attıtudes toward gıfted students and gıfted educatıon (Dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Davis, G. & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Drain, D. (2008). Teachers’ attitudes and practices toward differentiating for gifted learners in K-5 general education classrooms (Doctoral dissertation /online/) Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi. com/33/08/3308106.html on 23rd August 2016.
  • Eraslan Çapan, B. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli öğrenclere ilişkin metaforik algıları. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(12), 140-154.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
  • Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the dmgt 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 1(2), 81– 99.
  • Geake, J.G. & Gross M.U.M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217-231.
  • Güneş, A. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin üstün yetenekliler eğitimine ilişkin tutum ve öz-yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. Üstün Zekalılar Eğitimi ve Yaratıcılık Dergisi, 2(1), 12-16.
  • Hong, E., Greene, M. & Hartzell, S. (2011). Cognitive and motivational characteristics of elementary teachers in general education classrooms and in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(4), 250-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0016986211418107
  • Keskin, M. Ö., Samancı, N. K. ve Aydın, S. (2013). Science and art centers: Status, problems, and solution proposals. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1 (2), 78-96.
  • Krijan, I. P., Jurčec, L. & Borić E. (2015). Primary school teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 681-724.
  • Lassig, C. J. (2003). Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers’ attitudes. In Bartlett, B. and Bryer, F. and Roebuck, D., Eds. Proceedings 1st Annual International Conference on Cognition, Language, and Special Education Research: Reimagining Practice: Researching Change 2, pp. 141-152, Surfers Paradise, Australia.
  • Lewis, E. & Milton, M. (2005). Attitudes of teachers before and after professional development. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14(1), 5-14.
  • McCoach, D.B. & Siegel, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246-254.
  • McDaniel, T.R. (2002). Mainstreaming the gifted: historical perspectives on excellence and equity. Roeper Review, 24, 112-115.
  • Megay-Nespoli, K. (2001). Beliefs and attitudes of novice teachers regarding instruction of academically talented learners. Roeper Review, 23(3), 178-182.
  • Plunkett, M. (2000). Impacting on teacher attitudes toward gifted students. Australasian Journal o f Gifted Education, 9(2), 33-42.
  • Polyzopoulou, K., Kokarıdas, D., Patsıaouras, A. & Garı, A. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions toward education of gifted children in greek educational settings. Journal of Physical Education and Sport ® (JPES), 14(2), 211 - 221.
  • Pierce, R. & Adams, C. (2003). Attitudes of preservice and experience teachers toward diverse learners. Presentations at 2003 Hawaii international conference on education. Honolulu, HI.
  • Reis, S. M. & Sullivan, E. E. (2008). Characteristics of gifted learners: consistently varied; refreshingly diverse. Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Introduction to identification of students for gifted and talented programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (pp. xxiiixxxiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part Theoretical Approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3) 150-159.
  • Robinson, A. & Clinkenbeard, P.R. (2008). History of giftedness: Perspectives from the past presage modern scholarship. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices. New York, NY US: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: a synthesis of the research on educational practice. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396.
  • Sak, U. (2010). Üstün zekâlılar-özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri [Gifted students characteristics, identification and their education], Ankara: Maya publishing.
  • Schwartz, C. R. (2016). Ability and performance comparisons of gifted students in homogeneous and heterogeneous settings. Walden University retrieved from http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3336&context=dissertations on 23rd August 2016.
  • Smith, C. (2005). Teaching gifted and talented pupils in the primary school. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Sumreungwong, U. (2003). Preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes toward the characteristics and needs of gifted children (Doctoral dissertation), University of Northern Colorado, Colorado, United States. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database.
  • Şahin, F. ve Levent, F. (2015). Examining the methods and strategies which classroom teachers use in the education of gifted students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 3(5), 73-82.
  • Tirri, K. A., Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Adams, A. M., Yuen, M. & Lau, P. S. Y. (2002). Cross-cultural predictors of teachers’ attitudes toward gifted education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(2), 112-131.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Troxclair, D. A. (2013). Preservice teacher attitudes toward giftedness. Roeper Review, 35, 58-64.
  • Tortop, H. S. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının üstün yetenekli ve çok kültürlü eğitime ilişkin tutumları. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 16-26.
  • Watts, G. (2006). Teacher attitudes to the acceleration of the gifted: A case Study from New Zealand. Gifted and Talented, 10(1), 11-19.
Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-3638
  • Yayın Aralığı: 2
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Hizmet İçi Eğitime Katılan Lise Öğretmenlerinin Yaşam Boyu Öğrenmeye Yönelik Yeterlik Algıları

A. Selcen ARSLANGİLAY

Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimde Bilgisayar Okuryazarlığının, Motivasyonun ve Öz Yeterliliğin Öğrenme Başarısı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Değişkenlerin Araştırma Süresi İle İncelenmesi

SERKAN DİNÇER

The ‘Joy To Learn’ Research Project on Educational Experiences of Children: A comparison of Results from Bulgaria and Germany

Agnes PFRANG, Iliana MIRTSCHEWA, Elena DJAMBAZOVA, Klaudia SCHULTHEIS, Janice MYCK WAYNE

Danışman Öğretmenlerle Aday Öğretmenler Arasındaki Etkileşim Örüntülerinin Mesleki Gelişime Etkileri Bakımından İrdelenmesi

RAMAZAN SAĞ, Betül ŞAHİN, Ümmü Sezgin KANIK

Öğretmen Adaylarının Aldıkları Mesleki Eğitimin Yeterliliğine ve Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavı’na (KPSS) Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

ESED YAĞCI, Elif KURŞUNLU

Eğitimde Program Geliştirme Dersine Yönelik Tutum ve Metaforik Algıların İncelenmesi

DERYA GÖĞEBAKAN YILDIZ

Öğretmen Adaylarının Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitimine Yönelik Tutumları

İLKE EVİN GENCEL, İSMAİL SATMAZ

Ortaöğretim Türk Edebiyatı Dersi Öğretim Programı larının Gerçekleşme Durumunun İncelenmesi

AYLA ARSEVEN, Elif KONÜR, Sibel YAVUZKILIÇ

Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenmenin Okuduğunu Anlamaya Yönelik Akademik Başarı ve Öz-Düzenleme Becerileri Üzerindeki Etkisi

BİLGE KUŞDEMİR KAYIRAN, AHMET DOĞANAY

Okul Temelli Yaklaşımla Geliştirilen Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri Dersi Öğretim Programının Değerlendirilmesi

MELİS YEŞİLPINAR UYAR, AHMET DOĞANAY