SOCIOLOGY DIMENSION OF INNOVATION

In this study, it is aimed to examine the sociological dimensions of innovation. Innovation has emerged because of the needs related to social, cultural, and economic social conditions. This state of regeneration can be compared to the human body rebuilding itself at any moment. In addition to traditional cooperation models in financial, technological, and social terms, innovation can be made possible by the realization of cooperation between talented individuals, institutions and organizations with different cultures and backgrounds. In the study, the sociological dimensions of innovation have been created because of the theoretical compilation of related studies after a detailed literature review. During the review of the literature on the subject, content analysis is performed, and it is seen that three sociologically different themes about innovation come to the fore. These themes are Competitive lifestyle (social simulation), technology-oriented consumption habits (technological innovation) and quality-oriented economic relationships (quality innovation). The study emphasizes the correlation between these three themes and innovation. As a result, eight categories play a decisive role in innovation: impact, people and talent, partnership, coplacement centers, community identification, outreach and dissemination, management and governance, and business model, financial plan, and sustainability. Due to the interaction between themes defined as innovation and competitive lifestyle, technology-oriented consumption habits and quality-oriented economic relations, there is a dynamic network between people-oriented relationships and technology-oriented behavior and consumption patterns. While shaping this social network, every factor that innovation interacts with should be handled in a holistic manner.

İNOVASYONUN SOSYOLOJİK BOYUTLARI

Bu çalışmada inovasyonun sosyolojik boyutlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. İnovasyon, sosyal, kültürel ve ekonomik sosyal koşullarla ilgili ihtiyaçların bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu yenilenme durumu, insan bedeninin her an kendini yeniden inşa etmesine benzetilebilir. Finansal, teknolojik ve sosyal anlamda geleneksel iş birliği modellerinin yanı sıra, farklı kültür ve geçmişlere sahip yetenekli kişiler, kurum ve kuruluşlar arasında iş birliğinin gerçekleştirilmesi ile inovasyon mümkün hale getirilebilir. Çalışmada, inovasyonun sosyolojik boyutları detaylı bir literatür taramasından sonra ilgili çalışmaların teorik çerçevede derlenmesi sonucunda oluşturulmuştur. Konuya ilişkin literatür incelenmesi aşamasında içerik analizi yapılarak inovasyon konusuna dair sosyolojik olarak üç farklı temanın öne çıktığı görülmektedir. Bu temalar; Rekabetçi yaşam tarzı (sosyal simülasyon), teknoloji odaklı tüketim alışkanlıkları (teknolojik inovasyon) ve kalite odaklı ekonomik ilişkiler (kaliteli inovasyon) şeklinde belirlenmektedir. Çalışmada, özellikle bu üç tema ile inovasyon arasındaki ilişkisellik vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, etki, insanlar ve yetenek, ortaklık, ortak yerleştirme merkezleri, topluluk kimliği oluşturma, sosyal yardım ve yaygınlaştırma, yönetim ve yönetişim ve iş modeli, finansal plan ve sürdürülebilirlik olmak üzere sekiz kategori, inovasyonda belirleyici bir rol oynamaktadır. Çalışma, inovasyon ve rekabetçi yaşam tarzı, teknoloji odaklı tüketim alışkanlıkları ve kalite odaklı ekonomik ilişkiler olarak tanımlanan temalar arasındaki etkileşim nedeniyle, insan odaklı ilişkiler ile teknoloji odaklı davranış ve tüketim kalıpları arasında dinamik bir ağ olduğunu ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu sosyal ağı şekillendiren inovasyonun, etkileşimde bulunduğu her faktör açısından bütüncül bir şekilde ele alınması gerekmektedir.

Kaynakça

Ahrweiler, P., & Gilbert, N. (2015). The Quality of Social Simulation: An Example from Research Policy Modelling. Policy Practice and Digital Science, Editors: Marijn Janssen Maria A. Wimmer Ameneh Deljoo, Springer.

ASPA (2019). National Public Service Awards. ASPA 2019 Annual Conference March 8-12, Washington: https://www.aspanet.org/ASPA/Make-Connections/Awards/National-Public-Service-Award.aspx

Baudrillard, J. (2005). Simulars and Simulation. East West Publications.

Bollen, K. (1983). World System Position, Dependency and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence. American Sociological Review, 48, 468-479. DOI: 10.2307/2117715 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117715

Böyükaslan, A., & Tiryakioğlu, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial State. Innovative Financing: A Policy Quest for Turkey. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 8(1), 592-618. DOI: 10.20491/isader.2016.162

Can, P. (2012). A Study on the Impact of Marketing Processes on Innovation Strategies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Ataturk University Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.

Castells, M. (2005). Network Soceity, Center for Transatlantic Relations. Los Angeles: California.

CGFS (2010). Long-term Issues in International Banking. Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements Communications.

Colovic, A., & Lamotte, O. (2015). Technological Cooperation in the Global Competitive Environment. Creativy and Innovation Management, 24(4), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.003

Dawi, M. N., Jusoh, A., Streimikis, J., & Mardani, A. (2018). The influence of service quality on customer satisfaction and customer behavioral intentions by moderating role of switching barriers in satellite pay TV market. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 198-218. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/13

Diaconu, M. (2011). Technological Innovation: Concept, Process, Typology and Implications in the Economy. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 10(563), 127-144.

Diamond, D. W. (1996). Financial Intermediation as Delegated Monitoring: A Simple Example. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 82(3), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430

Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393-414.

EIT (2016). EIT's 2016 Call for Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KIC) Proposals. European Union: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). https://eit.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EIT%202016%20Call%20for%20KICs%20proposals.pdf

Eicher, L. D. (2020). Lidership Award ISO Award 2020. https://www.iso.org/iso-awards.html

EMEA (2020). List of Business Awards in EMEA Europe Middle East Africa. https://awards-list.com/internationalbusiness-awards/emea-business-awards/

Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology. 6th Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gilbert, N. (2007). Computational Social Science: Agent-Based Social Simulation. Guildford: Centre for Research on Social Simulation.

IGI Global (2020). What is Technological Innovation. https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/media-streamingtechnological-innovation-higher/29457

JGU (2020). The Sociology of Technology and Innovation, Social Simulation. https://technologyandinnovation.sociology.uni-mainz.de/

KPMG (2018). Global Fintech Research 2018. file:///C:/Users/ayseg/OneDrive/Masa%C3%BCst%C3%BC/F%C4%B0NANSAL%20%C4%B0NOVASYON/CANT%C 3%9CRK.pdf

Moore, M. H. (1995). Break-Through Innovation and Continuous Improvement: Two Different Models of Innovative Process in Public Sector. Public Money & Management, 25(1).

OECD (2007). Innovation and Growth Rationale for an Innovation Strategy. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/39374789.pdf

Phan, P. H. (2004). Entrepreneurship theory: Possibilities and Future Directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 617-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12534

Polat, M., & Oner, M. A. (2000). Innovation Management Techniques in Companies. Yeditepe University Institute of Social Sciences MBA Program.

Reynolds, P. D. (1991). Sociology and Entrepreneurship: Concepts and Contributions. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 2, 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600205

Sassen, S. (2002). Towards a Sociology of Information Technology. Current Sociology, 50(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003005

Slideshare (2020). Banking Services. https://www.slideshare.net/efinans/12-bankaclk-hizmetleri-ii

Şiriner, I (2008). Financial Globalization: Transformation in Monetary and Fiscal Policies. Istanbul: Eti Publications.

Qualityinnovation (2020). The Quality Innovation Award. https://www.qualityinnovation.org/

Thakor, A. V. (2019). Fintech and banking: What do we know? Fintech and Banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2019.100833

Thornton, D., & Stone, C. (1992). Financial Innovation: Causes and Consequences. (Eds) In Kevin Dowd and Mervyn K. Lewis. Current Issues in Monetary Economics London: McMillan.

Tobin, J. (1985). Financial Innavation and Deregulation in Percpective. Boj Monetary and Economic Studies, 3(2), 19-29.

UN (1995). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly. https://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/regular/50

Ünlükaplan, G. (2009). Determination of Economic Development, Competitiveness and Innovation Relations in Member States of the European Union with Canonical Correlation Analysis. Journal of Finance, 157, 235- 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176812

Weber, M. (1978). The Nature of Social Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yıldırım, F. (2015). Economic Archaeology and Importance of Technology and Innovation. Key Magazine, 324, 4- 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800207

Yıldırım, S. (2009). Supply Chain Management and Total Quality Management Relationship in Enterprises. Suleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 1(1),175-191.

Kaynak Göster