İSTANBUL'DA 11 AYRI OKUL ÇEŞİDİNDE OKUL GÜVENLİĞİ ARAŞTIRMASI

Okulda güvenliğin sağlanması ve okullarda şiddetin önlenerek öğrencilerin kendilerini güvende hissetmeleri, okullarda eğitim etkinliklerinin sürdürülebilmesinin de ön koşullarından biridir. Öğrencilerin okula yönelik algılarını ve bu algıları etkileyecek faktörleri belirlemek ve okullarda alınabilecek önlemleri düzenlemek güvenli okulun amaçlarından biridir. Bu çalışmada, CSG-BAU Güvenli Okul Projesi kapsamında İstanbul İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü ile imzalanan protokole göre belirlenen İstanbul'daki 11 farklı ilçeden 11 ayrı okulda okul iklimi ampirik olarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını 2014-2015 Öğretim yılında amaçlı örnekleme yapılarak seçilen 11 okuldaki 5. sınıftan 12.sınıfa kadar olan öğrenci (n = 2437) ve (n = 261) öğretmenler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak okul iklimini dört alt başlık (Akademik Beklenti, Akademik İlgi, İletişim ve Saygı ve Güvenlik) altında değerlendiren Şirin (2010) ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Okul iklimi algısını öğretmen, öğrenci, bölge ve sınıf düzeylerine göre analiz ederken betimsel istatistikler; karşılaştırmalar ve ilişkisel analizlerde ise MANOVA ve Pearson korelasyon istatistikleri kullanılmıştır. Öğretmenlerin ve öğrencilerin okul iklimi algıları olumlu yönde çıkarken, bölgelere ve sınıf düzeylerine göre okul iklimi algısı analiz edildiğinde kullanılan ölçeğin bazı alt ölçeklerinde anlamlı farklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, öğrenci, öğretmen ve okul çalışanlarının bulundukları çevreden kaynaklanan ve okul dışındaki yaşadıkları olumsuzlukları eğitim ve öğretimlerine odaklanmalarını etkilemediği görülmektedir.

SCHOOL SAFETY STUDY on 11 DIFFERENT SCHOOLS in ISTANBUL

One of pre-conditions that to maintain educational activities is to provide school security and to prevent violence in schools to feel safe students. The purpose of safe school is to determine students' perception towards schools and to state the factors which can influence the perception of students. In this study, school climates of 11 schools specified by the protocol that signed with Ministry Education of Turkey (MEB) were empirically conducted as a part of CSG-BAU Safe School Project. Target population of this study was 5th - 12th grades students and their teachers in public schools in Istanbul. Participants were 2437 students and 261 teachers from 11 public schools conveniently selected from the districts of Istanbul. Şirin (2010) instrument which have four subdomains (academic expectation, academic interest, communication, and respect and safety) was used in this study. Descriptive statistics, MANOVA, and Pearson correlation were conducted when analyzing the perception of the school climate with respect to teacher, student, district and grade. The results showed that the teachers' and students' school climate perceptions were positive, but the school climate perceptions of teachers and students with respect to districts and grades were statistically significant in some subdomains of the instruments. In conclusion, it is seen that negative incidents caused from both school environment and outside the school do not influence students', teachers' and staff's focus on their education and instruction.

___

  • Bear, G., Yang, C., & Pasipanodya, E. (2014). Assessing School Climate: Validation of a Brief Measure of the Perceptions of Parents. Journal Of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(2), 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734282914545748
  • Beaudoin, M. N. (2011). Respect -Where Do We Start?. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 40-44.
  • Boudreaux, M. K., Martin, R., & McNeal, L. (2016). Perceptions and relationships to school resources and academic achievement: Implications for the principal as instructional leader. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(4), 31-44.
  • Bozdoğan, A. E., ve Yalçın, N. (2006). Bilim Merkezlerinin İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Fene Karşı İlgi Düzeylerinin Değişmesine Ve Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi: Enerji Parkı. Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7(2), 95-114.
  • Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., Debnam, K. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2014). Measuring school climate in high schools: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of school health, 84(9), 593- 604.
  • Brand, S., Felner, R., Shim, M., Seitsinger, A., ve Dumas, T. (2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of educational psychology, 95(3), 570-588.
  • Bryk, A., ve Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • City Security Group (2015). CSG Güvenli Okul Rapor. İstanbul.
  • Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 201-237.
  • Cohen, J., Cardillo, R., & Pickeral, T. (2011). Creating a climate of respect. Educational Leadership, 69(1).
  • Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. The Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180-213.
  • Çalık, T., Özbay, Y., Özer, A., Kurt, T., ve Kandemir, M. (2009). İlköğretim okulu öğrencilerinin zorbalık statülerinin okul iklimi, prososyal davranışlar, temel ihtiyaçlar ve cinsiyet değişkenlerine göre incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 60(60), 555-576.
  • Çalık, T., Türker, K. U. R. T., ve Çalık, C. (2011). Güvenli okulun oluşturulmasında okul iklimi: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(4), 73-84.
  • Doğan, S. (2012). Lise öğrencilerinin okul iklimi algıları. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(10), 55-92.
  • Dönmez, B. (2001). Okul güvenliği sorunu ve okul yöneticisinin rolü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 7(1), 63-74.
  • Dönmez, B. ve Güven, M. (2003). Genel liselerdeki yönetici ve öğretmenlerin okul güvenliğine ilişkin görev algıları. Çağdaş Eğitim, 28(304), 17-26.
  • Duckworth, K. (1984). School discipline policy: A problem of balance. R&D Perspectives. Eugene, Oregon: Center for Educational Policy and Management. ERIC veri tabanından alınmıştır (ED252926).
  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
  • Emmons, C. L. (1993). School development in an inner city: An analysis of factors selected from Comer's program using latent variable structural equations modeling. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(A), 1287A. 29 Eylül 2015 tarihinde http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI9326212 sayfasından alınmıştır.
  • Ennis, C. D. (1998). Shared expectations: Creating a joint vision for urban schools. Advances in research on teaching, 7, 151-182.
  • Erol, F. (2009). Okulda Güvenlik Sorununa Yol Açan Etkenlerin Belirlenmesi. Ankara, TC Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Eğitimi Araştırma Ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı.
  • Farrell, A. F., & Collier, M. A. (2010). School personnel's perceptions of family-school communication: a qualitative study. Improving Schools, 13(1), 4-20.
  • Freiberg, H. J. (1998). Measuring school climate: Let me count the ways. Educational Leadership, 56(1), 22-26.
  • Garcia, P. A. (1994). Creating a safe school climate. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 24(2), 22-24.
  • Halawah, I. (2005). The relationship between effective communication of high school principal and school climate. Education, 126(2), 334-345.
  • Henry, S. (2000). What is school violence? An integrated definition. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 567(1), 16-29.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Random House Trade.
  • Hoy, W. K., Hannum, J., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership, 8(4), 336-359.
  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279.
  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools, healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills , CA: Corwin Press/Sage Publications.
  • Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (19. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Karslı, M. D. (1998). Yönetsel etkililik. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kessler, S. R., Spector, P. E., Chang, C. H., & Parr, A. D. (2008). Organizational violence and aggression: Development of the three-factor violence climate survey. Work & Stress, 22(2), 108-124.
  • Kline, T. J. B., & Boyd, J. E. (1991). Organizational structure, context, and climate: Their relationships to job satisfaction at three managerial levels. The Journal of General Psychology, 118(4), 305-316.
  • Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448- 470.
  • Linzer, M., Manwell, L. B., Mundt, M., Williams, E., Maguire, A., McMurray, J., & Plane, M. B. (2005). Organizational climate, stress, and error in primary care: the MEMO study. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
  • Litwin, G. H., & Stringer Jr, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
  • Loukas, A., Suzuki, & R. Horton, K.D. (2006). Examining School Connectedness as a mediator of school climate effects. Journal of Research on Adolesence, 16(3), 491-502.
  • Manning, M. L., & Saddlemire, R. (1996). Developing a sense of community in secondary schools. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 80(584), 41-48.
  • Michela, J. L., Lukaszewski, M. P., & Allegrante, J. P. (1995). Organizational climate and work stress: a general framework applied to inner-city school teachers. In Sauter, S. L., Murphy, S. L. R. (Ed.), Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress (pp.61-80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • National School Climate Council (NSCC). (2012). School climate. 11 Aralık 2012 tarihinde http:// www.schoolclimate.org/climate/ adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety science, 34(1), 99-109.
  • Patterson, R. M., Maldonado, D. N., & Howe, M. (2014). School District Officials' and City Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding School Violence and Ways to Prevent School Violence. ERIC veritabanından alınmıştır (ED555258)
  • Pink, W. T. (1982). School Effects, Academic Performance, and School Crime: Some Inescapable Realities of Viewing Schools from the Inside. Urban Education, 17(1), 51-72.
  • Pritchard, R. D., & Karasick, B. W. (1973). The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational behavior and human performance, 9(1), 126-146.
  • Robers, S., Kemp, J., Truman, J., & Snyder, T. D. (2013). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2012. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dep. of Justice
  • Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child development, 54(1), 1-29. Safety. 2011.
  • In Merriam-Webster.com. 17 Eylül 2015 tarihinde http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/safety adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Schulte, M., Ostroff, C., & Kinicki, A.J. (2006). Organizational climate systems and psychological climate perceptions: A cross-level study of climate-satisfaction relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,79(4), 645-671.
  • Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  • Şirin, S. (2010). Okul İklimi: Nedir? Nasıl ölçülür?. 29 Eylül 2015 tarihinde http://www.toder.org/sayfa/okul_iklimi__nedir__nasil_olculur____1 adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Şişman, M. (2002). Örgütler ve kültürler. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). California CA: Ally and Bacon.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Respecting students. Educational Leadership, 69(1), 94-95.
  • Turan, S. (1998). Measuring organizational climate and organizational commitment in the Turkish educational context. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration (St. Louis, MO, October 30 - November 1, 1998). ED 429359.
  • Wanatt, C. L. (1996). Defining Safe Schools. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 2(2), 121-32.
  • Wang, C., Berry, B., ve Swearer, S. M. (2013). The critical role of school climate in effective bullying prevention. Theory Into Practice, 52(4), 296-302.
  • Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
  • Wilde, J. (1995). Anger management in schools alternative to student violence. Basel: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
  • Williams, R. L. (1970). Black Pride, Academic Relevance & Individual Achievement. Counseling Psychol, 2(1), 18- 22.
  • Wilson-Fleming, L., & Wilson-Younger, D. (2012). Positive Classroom Environments= Positive Academic Results. Online Submission. 11 Aralık 2012 tarihinde http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536465.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Xiaofu, P., & Qiwen, Q. (2007). An analysis of the relation between secondary school organizational climate and teacher job satisfaction. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 65-77.